Samsung continues to "dumb down" its Galaxy flagships by removing features; keeping many specs as-is for years and years; and adding AI elements that few people asked for - or will use, for the most part. Motorola, however, is being smart about adding features and increasing functionality.
www.sammyfans.com
How many years has Samsung had 5000 mAH batteries in its flagships, with 45W of wired charging? Only this year, the Galaxy S26 Ultra can charge at 60W. Motorola's new devices can charge at 68W. Samsung removed Bluetooth from the S Pen; and eliminated the digitizer layer from the Z Fold: a phone with a gorgeous screen BEGGING to be used for graphics and design. Samsung decided more people wanted a thin foldable than a feature-packed one. Motorola just improved the stylus on the Moto G Stylus 2026; and the upcoming Razr Fold will have a digitizer layer, allowing stylus use. Motorola still believes that people prefer a microSD slot for storage... while Samsung makes users either pay for additional internal storage or cloud storage.
Frankly, I prefer storing my files on the microSD card. If I drop my Motorola phone with a 1TB card in it and the phone will never power on again, I can remove the card; pop it in a new phone; and keep going. If someone drops their 1TB Galaxy S26 Ultra, all that data is GONE (unless it's backed up). My Moto G Stylus 2026 has shipped: I'll keep my S24 Ultra as a camera device since it records up to 8K video, but my SIM card will be on the new phone.
What are your thoughts on Samsung vs. Motorola?
Motorola becoming the anti-Samsung – A problem Samsung should take seriously
Samsung owns Android, which has been true for years, and the Galaxy maker has done little to pretend otherwise, but quietly, methodically, Motorola has been building something worth paying attention to. Over the past few years, Motorola has made a series of smart, deliberate choices. The company...
How many years has Samsung had 5000 mAH batteries in its flagships, with 45W of wired charging? Only this year, the Galaxy S26 Ultra can charge at 60W. Motorola's new devices can charge at 68W. Samsung removed Bluetooth from the S Pen; and eliminated the digitizer layer from the Z Fold: a phone with a gorgeous screen BEGGING to be used for graphics and design. Samsung decided more people wanted a thin foldable than a feature-packed one. Motorola just improved the stylus on the Moto G Stylus 2026; and the upcoming Razr Fold will have a digitizer layer, allowing stylus use. Motorola still believes that people prefer a microSD slot for storage... while Samsung makes users either pay for additional internal storage or cloud storage.
Frankly, I prefer storing my files on the microSD card. If I drop my Motorola phone with a 1TB card in it and the phone will never power on again, I can remove the card; pop it in a new phone; and keep going. If someone drops their 1TB Galaxy S26 Ultra, all that data is GONE (unless it's backed up). My Moto G Stylus 2026 has shipped: I'll keep my S24 Ultra as a camera device since it records up to 8K video, but my SIM card will be on the new phone.
What are your thoughts on Samsung vs. Motorola?
Last edited: