• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Bank

Sounds fair to me. If you only want the rich to vote for the candidates, you need to make rules and laws that makes sure that only happens. It is called a plutocracy for a reason. On the other hand, it is why this country will fail in the end.
 
A woman surreptitiously filmed the interactions as her 18-year-old son leaps through hurdle after hurdle in an attempt to get a constitutionally-guaranteed state ID so that he could vote.

Constitutionally guaranteed state ID? One of the recently discovered amendments "They" do not want you to know about?
 
lol, best argument ever. the constitution states no one can be denied the right to vote that is a naturalized citizen. if id is required, the 14,19,23,24,26 admendments require it to be free and easily obtained. sorry typing with FireFox is fun.
 
A poll tax is explicitly forbidden in the Constitution. I'm betting this is more of an incompetent DMV worker than a Wisconsin state policy.
 
actually its a case of uninformed activists looking for a reason to whine because they cant commit election fraud anymore........

to get a voter ID you must provide proof of residency..... period...... if youre homeless..... guess what...... you dont reside there....... you can legally claim a homeless shelter as your place of residence in this case... if youre truly homeless and not just claiming it to commit fraud

in this case this kid chose to use a bank statement as his proof of residency........ which is perfectly acceptable within reason...... since under the ACCEPTABLE forms of proof a this is listed.... however the only way to show that its an active account is if there is activity listed on the statement...... which according to the video they ACCEPTED his level of activity after scrutiny...... has nothing to do with his balance...... it has everything to do with whether he actually resides there and uses that account or if its just a bogus/new account for the purposes of fraud...... this kid could have chosen any one of many different forms of proof....... he chose the bank statement

I personally (after being stationed in Kansas in the Army) maintained a bank account in Manhatten, Ks for nearly 10 years after I moved away...... I did it for a specific reason at the time....... but I didnt live in Ks for those 10 years..... so what youre suggesting is I should have been allowed to legally vote in both my home state and Ks as well? since I could prove I lived in both places? NO because my bank statement didnt show activity which indicated I was actually living in Ks at the time....... which is what they guy at the DMV was looking for in this case....... some reason to believe this kids proof of residency actually proved anything at all

I wonder how many 20 year old kids have NO form of drivers license/ state ID/ school ID/ etc that they could use for this purpose........ he has a bank account with no other forms of ID??? how did he even set up the bank account? federal law says he has to show proof of ID to set up that account

these people went to the DMV with the express purpose of creating a video.... which they edited quite nicely.... and they found a part time worker who obviously didnt know youre supposed to bitchslap ******s back into line
 

The Republicans are likely guilty as sin... as are the Democrats. The Republicans manipulate elections like they did in 2004 and the Democrats try to push through Universal Voter Registration to allow all those honest, sincere, and misunderstood illegal aliens to vote in upcoming elections.

‪Universal Voter Registration‬‏ - YouTube

FairVote.org | Universal Voter Registration Legislation
 
How about requiring enough brain "activity" to vote? But that would disqualify about 40% of the nation.
 
actually its a case of uninformed activists looking for a reason to whine because they cant commit election fraud anymore........

to get a voter ID you must provide proof of residency..... period...... if youre homeless..... guess what...... you dont reside there....... you can legally claim a homeless shelter as your place of residence in this case... if youre truly homeless and not just claiming it to commit fraud

in this case this kid chose to use a bank statement as his proof of residency........ which is perfectly acceptable within reason...... since under the ACCEPTABLE forms of proof a this is listed.... however the only way to show that its an active account is if there is activity listed on the statement...... which according to the video they ACCEPTED his level of activity after scrutiny...... has nothing to do with his balance...... it has everything to do with whether he actually resides there and uses that account or if its just a bogus/new account for the purposes of fraud...... this kid could have chosen any one of many different forms of proof....... he chose the bank statement

I personally (after being stationed in Kansas in the Army) maintained a bank account in Manhatten, Ks for nearly 10 years after I moved away...... I did it for a specific reason at the time....... but I didnt live in Ks for those 10 years..... so what youre suggesting is I should have been allowed to legally vote in both my home state and Ks as well? since I could prove I lived in both places? NO because my bank statement didnt show activity which indicated I was actually living in Ks at the time....... which is what they guy at the DMV was looking for in this case....... some reason to believe this kids proof of residency actually proved anything at all

I wonder how many 20 year old kids have NO form of drivers license/ state ID/ school ID/ etc that they could use for this purpose........ he has a bank account with no other forms of ID??? how did he even set up the bank account? federal law says he has to show proof of ID to set up that account

these people went to the DMV with the express purpose of creating a video.... which they edited quite nicely.... and they found a part time worker who obviously didnt know youre supposed to bitchslap ******s back into line

I also suspect there is more to it than the video suggests.
 
Sounds fair to me. If you only want the rich to vote for the candidates, you need to make rules and laws that makes sure that only happens. It is called a plutocracy for a reason. On the other hand, it is why this country will fail in the end.

I am always hearing that the true power resides with rich white republicans. Please explain why we have a black president.
 
I am always hearing that the true power resides with rich white republicans. Please explain why we have a black president.
We have a black president??!?!?!? The only black president we ever had was Bill Clinton.

But, I digress, I said, rich, not white. You are trying to do your straw man arguments again. First, insert language you can argue with, then argue with what you said, I said.

As pointed out, by oddly, you, obama makes millions of dollars a year. You first have a problem with him making millions of dollars and now you are going to excluding him from that money?
 
We have a black president??!?!?!? The only black president we ever had was Bill Clinton.

But, I digress, I said, rich, not white. You are trying to do your straw man arguments again. First, insert language you can argue with, then argue with what you said, I said.

As pointed out, by oddly, you, obama makes millions of dollars a year. You first have a problem with him making millions of dollars and now you are going to excluding him from that money?

Not at all. If you earn millions, pay taxes and have a good life.
 
Back
Top Bottom