• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Chinese Ubuntu

Canonical seems to be spending some big money marketing Ubuntu in China, I'm starting to some low-cost Ubuntu PCs and laptops in the stores now. I know about Ubuntu on phones and tablets. But Canonical would have to convince the manufacturers about Ubuntu, who at the moment are 100% Android.

From what I hear, I think the government's intention is not be reliant on Microsoft at all. There is a home-grown Red-Flag Linux, but it's quite ropey and now seems to be pretty much abandoned.

"However, I think it's unlikely we'll see creepy backdoors or monitoring software built into Ubuntu Kylin. First, the open source nature will mean it'd have to be done in binary form, and even that will stand out among the rest of the open source operating system. Aside form that, there's the simple fact that monitoring on the device itself is inefficient compared to monitoring the network itself."

I know a lot of home-grown Windows software has government back-doors, censoring and monitoring, as does the PRC versions things like Skype. And probably Windows itself. It seems with Ubuntu Kylin, the intention to keep it completely open source, and thus no governent spying within the OS itself. But that doesn't stop proprietary Linux apps having back-doors etc, and of course the networks are monitored and censored.

For a while now, Canonical's intention seems to be monetising Ubuntu, with the Amazon partnerships. I'm sure they would like to have their OS on every PC, phone and tablet in China, and I'd guess that would be in partnership with a Chinese on-line vendor like Taobao.
 
Be nice if the UK Government's intention was not to be reliant on Microsoft (Or any proprietary software) as well. I'd really like to see all Govt./Public service software be fully Free (GPL'd) and open source. Mor so since hearing Richard Stallman speak last week.
 
I think you over-estimate the technical competency of anyone in the UK govt :)

Besides, have you any idea how much it would cost to convert all those systems?!
 
Besides, have you any idea how much it would cost to convert all those systems?!
Not nearly as much, in the long run, as continuing to fork good money after bad to micro$oft. Sure, there would be some upfront costs, mostly in terms of (wo)man hours, but in the end it would save billions.
 
Besides, have you any idea how much it would cost to convert all those systems?!
I actually recall reading something about this in the past year or so... though, if I am remembering the particular case correctly, it was paid for by Microsoft and was therefore not a 'reliable' source in the eyes of the readers.

:/
 
Back
Top Bottom