Root [DEV-ONLY] Rush OC Kernel

[rbheromax]

DO NOT FLASH THE INCLUDED BOOT IMAGES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the stuff I used to build a kernel OC'd to 1.9 GHz, which I believe isn't safe. This is the thing that bricked Slayer72's Rush SO DO NOT FLASH THIS. I am strictly putting this out there to see if anyone can figure out why this kernel bricks and maybe even boot.

removed by mod

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DO NOT FLASH THE INCLUDED BOOT IMAGES

 

[Shabbypenguin]

im willing to bet large sums of money its because rbheromax doesnt have a clue on what hes doing.

static struct clkctl_acpu_speed acpu_freq_tbl[] = {
	{ 0, 24576,  LPXO, 0, 0,  30720000,  900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	{ 0, 61440,  PLL_3,    5, 11, 61440000,  900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	{ 1, 122880, PLL_3,    5, 5,  61440000,  900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	{ 0, 184320, PLL_3,    5, 4,  61440000,  900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	{ 0, MAX_AXI_KHZ, AXI, 1, 0, 61440000, 900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	{ 1, 245760, PLL_3,    5, 2,  61440000,  900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	{ 1, 368640, PLL_3,    5, 1,  122800000, 900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	/* AXI has MSMC1 implications. See above. */
	{ 1, 768000, PLL_1,    2, 0,  153600000, 1050, VDD_RAW(1050) },
	/*
	 * AXI has MSMC1 implications. See above.
	 */
	{ 1, 806400,  PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1100, VDD_RAW(1100), &pll2_tbl[0]},
	{ 1, 1024000, PLL_2, 3, 0, [B]UINT_MAX, 1200, VDD_RAW(1200)[/B], &pll2_tbl[1]},
	{ 1, 1200000, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1200, VDD_RAW(1200), &pll2_tbl[2]},
	{ 1, 1401600, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1250, VDD_RAW(1250), &pll2_tbl[3]},
	{ 1, 1516800, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1250, VDD_RAW(1250), &pll2_tbl[5]},
	{ 1, 1612800, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1300, VDD_RAW(1350), &pll2_tbl[6]},
	{ 0, 1708800, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1350, VDD_RAW(1350), &pll2_tbl[7]},
	{ 0, 1804800, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1350, VDD_RAW(1350), &pll2_tbl[8]},
	{ 0, 1900800, PLL_2, 3, 0, [B]UINT_MAX, 1450, VDD_RAW(1450)[/B], &pll2_tbl[9]},
	{ 0 }
};

where exactly did you get your voltage information from? because im gunna guess you didnt know and that extra 250mV's is what fried his cpu. obviously i could be wrong... but i doubt it

had you done as we had suggested and actually listened to us (myself, playfulgod, interloper) then slayer72 would prolly still have his rush

 

[rbheromax]

Well I took this voltage info from this:
https://github.com/shinru2004/WARP_...ad234/arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock-7x30.c#L154

And it had looked correct to me because I thought it had to scale upwards with the clock



I feels stupid for that, thanks Shabby for taking a look at it

 

[EarlyMon]

Pretty surprised that voltages for nanoscale electronics are being messed with without a _complete_ understanding of what's involved.

No further point to this thread.