rootabaga
Android Expert
On the totality of facts and circumstances of this case, I agree with the outcome dismissing all charges against the man who shot down the drone.
I'm also perturbed by the drone's owner who seems to think he has a right to overfly and observe the property of others at his whim (and says he plans to appeal for an indictment to a grand jury).
That said, I certainly don't agree with people just randomly grabbing a shotgun and shooting down drones whenever they see them, though I certainly appreciate and understand the property owner's concerns.
There's lots of legislation coming down the pike that will hopefully address these kinds of concerns, though there will still be the issues that arise when drone owners decide to ignore the law, just as some now ignore the rights of others to be left alone.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...rideth-kentucky-man-arrested-shooting-n452281
What does everyone else think?
I'm also perturbed by the drone's owner who seems to think he has a right to overfly and observe the property of others at his whim (and says he plans to appeal for an indictment to a grand jury).
That said, I certainly don't agree with people just randomly grabbing a shotgun and shooting down drones whenever they see them, though I certainly appreciate and understand the property owner's concerns.
There's lots of legislation coming down the pike that will hopefully address these kinds of concerns, though there will still be the issues that arise when drone owners decide to ignore the law, just as some now ignore the rights of others to be left alone.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...rideth-kentucky-man-arrested-shooting-n452281
What does everyone else think?