This is kind of a silly question, but I had to ask it anyway.
When it comes to battery performance, is the charge capacity (measured in mAh) the only metric that matters?
I ask because I have owned a Droid Eris (1500 mAh battery) and a Droid (1400 mAh battery), and the battery life on the Droid was vastly superior.
This is despite the Droid having a larger, higher-resolution screen.
So, why the disparity? Are there some components of the Sense UI that drain the battery more heavily? Or could it have been because the Eris had Android 1.8 when I had it, while the Droid had Android 2.0?
I'm mainly concerned about the 1400 mAh battery on the HTC Thunderbolt. Will I be able to expect reasonable battery life out of it, or will it be poor -- much like the Eris was when I owned it? Will the 1930 mAh battery on the Droid Bionic sustain it significantly longer, or is the Tegra 2 much more power-hungry than the Snapdragon MSM8655?
Thanks.
When it comes to battery performance, is the charge capacity (measured in mAh) the only metric that matters?
I ask because I have owned a Droid Eris (1500 mAh battery) and a Droid (1400 mAh battery), and the battery life on the Droid was vastly superior.
This is despite the Droid having a larger, higher-resolution screen.
So, why the disparity? Are there some components of the Sense UI that drain the battery more heavily? Or could it have been because the Eris had Android 1.8 when I had it, while the Droid had Android 2.0?
I'm mainly concerned about the 1400 mAh battery on the HTC Thunderbolt. Will I be able to expect reasonable battery life out of it, or will it be poor -- much like the Eris was when I owned it? Will the 1930 mAh battery on the Droid Bionic sustain it significantly longer, or is the Tegra 2 much more power-hungry than the Snapdragon MSM8655?
Thanks.