PH8AL
Android Enthusiast
I base that opinion on the Omnipotence Paradox.
Most religions make the claim their God is Omnipotent. Literally meaning all power.
You hear this echoed repeatedly "the all mighty God" Further that he is omnipresent as part of this omnipotence.
Going by memory for this date of 800 years ago. The Omnipotence Paradox completely debunks the possibility of an Omnipotent God.
I am working here completely from personal knowledge so no links but google as ever is your friend if you would like to fact check my statements.
Here is the logical method used to reach a paradox.
Can God as an Omnipotent being create a rock so massive that he, himself can not lift it?
Yes? That proves with out doubt that he is not Omnipotent because he can not lift the rock.
No? That proves he is not Omnipotent because he can not create the rock he can't lift.
Its a perfect paradox which in philosophical and scientific view is the end of a line of debate or questioning.
Now I know some of you are off to try to debunk this and please feel free. In some 800 years the only way this paradox has been debunked was to change the definition of Omnipotence. There are currently 4 different definitions regarding this topic. The 1st is literal omnipotence which just died in a paradox above.
The others redefine the rules of omnipotence which define the limits of God and no matter how long you argue them having to limit God's omnipotence to break the paradox just reinforces it.
Discuss.
Most religions make the claim their God is Omnipotent. Literally meaning all power.
You hear this echoed repeatedly "the all mighty God" Further that he is omnipresent as part of this omnipotence.
Going by memory for this date of 800 years ago. The Omnipotence Paradox completely debunks the possibility of an Omnipotent God.
I am working here completely from personal knowledge so no links but google as ever is your friend if you would like to fact check my statements.
Here is the logical method used to reach a paradox.
Can God as an Omnipotent being create a rock so massive that he, himself can not lift it?
Yes? That proves with out doubt that he is not Omnipotent because he can not lift the rock.
No? That proves he is not Omnipotent because he can not create the rock he can't lift.
Its a perfect paradox which in philosophical and scientific view is the end of a line of debate or questioning.
Now I know some of you are off to try to debunk this and please feel free. In some 800 years the only way this paradox has been debunked was to change the definition of Omnipotence. There are currently 4 different definitions regarding this topic. The 1st is literal omnipotence which just died in a paradox above.
The others redefine the rules of omnipotence which define the limits of God and no matter how long you argue them having to limit God's omnipotence to break the paradox just reinforces it.
Discuss.