Which in reality means "this app will conflict with your OS's own RAM management, use up more system resources and increase power drain". I really wonder whether the people who write these things don't understand Linux RAM management themselves, and so believe that this is helpful, or whether they are deliberately producing things they know are counter-productive because they've seen that there is a market for them?
Initially it won't be apparent. But over time your phone will slow down. Most of those complaining that their Androids slow down after a few months are those that use such task killer apps. I've used a Note 2 for 3 years which never slowed down despits having a lot of customizations done. And yet people keep on saying that Androids slow down over time. They don't.
Those two phones are using the same CPU type, cortex A53 octacores. The Lenovo however is clocked higher at 1.8Ghz compared to 1.3Ghz on the HTC. As for the phone speed, both are mid range devices whose speeds should do fine. Gaming may not be as good as on higher end devices but they should be ok. The A53 is still designed for efficiency, instead of power, but it's fast enough to be used as the power efficient cores on the Galaxy S6. Haven't found exact benchmarks for that CPU, but if I were to hazard a guess, the Lenovo should be more powerful than a Galaxy S4 in raw computing, maybe closer to an S5. The HTC will be slightly less powerful than that, but I don't think they'd be too noticeable.
No. First time I've ever heard of both brands and they don't appear on GSMArena.
