• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

So What Are Your Views?

Some of you points point to your belief that the poor shouldn't pro-create, and while I find that kinda hurtful and hateful I suppose there is at least a kind of economic logic to your argument.

But many of your points have nothing to do with finance; you talk about where the man doesn't want the child, "...then ****ing kill it..."; you say rapists "...aren't getting away..." with regards abortion of their child, but you refuse to clarify what you meant; you say that a man should have an equal vote in the decision to abort, but that his vote counts for nothing.:confused:

Nobody gets pregnant alone, the responsibility is shared and I don't think that a man should be absolved of that responsibility simply because he chooses to be. Think it through smacky, do you think it'd be okay to walk away from a mother with a child aged 1year old, and not expect the man to provide any financial assistance? because there's no difference in what you advocating, except that you're 'forcing' a mother to either accept sole responsibility or to abort what could be a perfectly viable and wanted child on economic grounds that she may not have foreseen.


His vote counts more for himself rather than the child. Having the child has potential to ruin three lives: the woman and man who can't support it, and then the baby's who will live in poverty. If there is a solution to this problem and it isn't chosen, then why don't the people or the person involved in making the decision suffer for it? If the man says "I can't support it" but the woman says "I don't care, we're having it," doesn't that seem a bit unfair to you? For both the child and the man?

If the man says he wants it, and the woman doesn't, we'll say for the same reason the man didn't want it in the above scenario, it seems unfair for both sides if it goes in favor of one over the other. But doesn't that still prevent a child raised in an non-ideal household?

My argument is not really geared to the rich or poor. It's more so for the average person. I'm not saying poor people shouldn't procreate. Plenty of people live in poverty and still live their lives. I guess my focus is more for people my age, in their teens and early-twenties. When a 16 year old dad and 16 year old mom are at a crossroads. Sure, they were both needed in order for the conception to happen, but again, they're 16. Can they support the child the way a more financially stable couple (and assumably older couple) would?

In this case, if either one of the parents are smart, will they not say "I'm not mature enough to be a parent, nor do I have the money. Let's not have the kid and be careful next time?" If the mom thinks that the child will be ok, but the father doesn't, is it fair he still has to support it? It's one thing if the child is already born. It's there. But if it's only a few weeks into the pregnancy? The solution is RIGHT THERE. Have the abortion and make sure it doesn't happen again (the fines and penalties complement this idea). But because the mom wants it, the baby is born and both mother and father are in a tough situation? What am I missing here?

If it's a married couple, I don't know. Separate laws for that may have to be put into place. I'm not married so I can't speak on what married couples have to go through.

I guess with that logic, I've never knocked a girl up accidentally either, so I shouldn't speak on that. But those are my views at this point. And I think it acts upon the fairness of the situation. Too many women use it as a trap for the guy. Conversely, there are instances of rape that lead to unwanted children as well. It isn't fair to the child to grow up knowing they were a result of rape, and it isn't fair for the woman, in addition to being raped, having to see the fruits of the event everyday.

Sometimes what is moral or "the right thing to do", is not always "fair" or "equal."


Would they be required to prove that they'd been raped to avoid your accusation of being a whore?

It's called a police report. In this day and age of women being strong and all that jazz, they should report rape, not sit in a corner and cry about it. The "adult" or "responsible" thing to do would be to contact the authorities and seek help.
 
...doesn't that seem a bit unfair to you?...
No, sounds like big ol' grown up responsibility to me.

...I guess my focus is more for people my age, in their teens and early-twenties... ...What am I missing here?...
Empathy? experience?

You talk about the subject as if each person should fill out a questionnaire, and should they score less than X the pregnancy is aborted, you completely disregard any emotions a pregnant woman might have.

......If it's a married couple, I don't know. Separate laws for that may have to be put into place....

...It's called a police report. In this day and age of women being strong and all that jazz, they should report rape, not sit in a corner and cry about it...
Again you seem to completely lack empathy, and in the case of separate laws for married couples etc. you lack practicality.

I think it's clear where you're coming from at the moment, and without meaning it to sound like an attack it seems to be a very selfish POV you have. I genuinely would love to hear your views on this thread, and your posts in about 15years from now.
 
No, sounds like big ol' grown up responsibility to me.


Empathy? experience?

You talk about the subject as if each person should fill out a questionnaire, and should they score less than X the pregnancy is aborted, you completely disregard any emotions a pregnant woman might have.


Again you seem to completely lack empathy, and in the case of separate laws for married couples etc. you lack practicality.

I think it's clear where you're coming from at the moment, and without meaning it to sound like an attack it seems to be a very selfish POV you have. I genuinely would love to hear your views on this thread, and your posts in about 15years from now.


Where does the empathy start and where does it end? When you show "empathy" most people begin to take advantage of it. I'm not talking about my personal experiences, I'm talking about many things we have out there today that we use to help people, yet it seems some of those people abuse it instead of using it properly or legally.

Society is pretty damn stupid. When you give them choices, they don't know what to do with them. Maybe it complicates things?

I catch a lot of flak for this point of view as well, but I don't think humans are much different from wild animals. Without going too in-depth into it and taking the thread on a tangent, the ease with which we can accept the killing of animals, we should have no problem in killing fetuses.

I'm not vegan nor an activist, but when people see animals as lesser than them, and use that to justify killing wild animals for fun, it irks me. Which is why I sometimes wonder if today's issues would exist if we lived much like the animals back in the "caveman era." Seems like an obvious answer, "no," because of technology, but would we have new problems then? And would people still have the same views if they didn't have medicine and technology to hide behind?
 
Heres my opinion,

Abortion: If you had sex then you knew the risks, and by having it you have agreed to take the risks. If you cant handle the baby, then dont have sex. Simple. And dont say you had sex because you felt you needed to connect with your partner, this connection you felt is called lust.

Guns: They are our right.

Illegal Immigration: Dont take the short cuts, if you came here, then you also agree to abide by the laws here. There is no special exception. Do it LEGALLY.

Taxes: You have to agree there are some stupid taxes in this country. Like the ones that were put on all the stuff in the moving truck when I moved from NC to WA State, I had to pay for taxes on my TV, my ATV, etc. But as long as they are not toooo radical, Im ok with e'm.

Death Penalty: I think its the victims families choice, they are the ones suffering, not us.

Gays in the Military: Again, that should be up to the soldiers who serve side by side them, not us.

Gay Marriage: Thats up to the state.


Politicians: Term limits and pay limits, also need to do the right thing, not whats going to get them re-elected.

Government Health Care/ Health Care Reform: Well, that already applies to me, since Im in an Army family, we get Military benefits, which means free healthcare, the same thats gonna be applying to all Americans. Honestly, it sucks. The waiting times are loooong, its usually too crowded, the PA's are usually Specialists (E-4s) with general knowledge, but never as good as a private doctor. To be honest they always get you to see someone else who has better knowledge of your condition, and in the end you have seen about 5 diffrent people before they give you a subscription or treat you. Im used to it though, but it sucks.
 
Actually they want more responsibility. I dont know where you got that from.

Don't you know that having responisibility for yourself and expecting other people to do the same, is lazy? We are our brothers' keeper because they are not capable of caring for themselves. Anyone who thinks that we should let people do for themselves when we know what's best for them is selfish and probably racist.
 
Back
Top Bottom