jkc120
Android Expert
Try OpenSignalMaps: it'll tell you where your tower is.
For me openmaps shows signal level at "47%" and the second I step outside 5 feet its at 70%.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Try OpenSignalMaps: it'll tell you where your tower is.
For me openmaps shows signal level at "47%" and the second I step outside 5 feet its at 70%.
How about call quality compared to the iphone. Are you getting dropped calls or bad connections while your wife's Iphone is not?
Are you in a 4g Zone or 4g Extended zone?
I've actually experienced this before. I was working around a tower, had full strength until I got under a half-mile, then the closer I got, the weaker the signal was.

If it's just the OS dropping it from 4g to 3g based on "number of bars" then the code is absurd. It has to base it on actual signal values not # of bars. Which is why I agree and call BS on this. If they just make cosmetic changes, those of us seeing a drop from 4g to 3g will simply see it go from 3 bars of 4g to 4-5 bars of 3g instead of 1-2 bars of 4g to 2-3 bars of 3g. So we'll see the same drop down and it'll be obvious they are sugar coating dog poo.

Try OpenSignalMaps: it'll tell you where your tower is.

Huh. Do you know how that could happen?
The thing is, the dB numbers currently displayed are accurate, and the bars based on them are also presumably accurate -- they're just based on LTE signals instead of the stronger 3G signals the way other phones are. So rather than artificially inflate bars, they could just convert Nexus to display the 3G values. Pity that whole thing about showing numbers that don't actually have to do with the type of signal the phone's connected to.![]()
Now that you mention it, I've gotten results I don't particularly understand either. Sorry if that was lame. Anybody know an app that's more accurate... or less buggy?I don't really trust that app it shows me connected to a tower that doesn't exist![]()
umm...so even when the phone is set to cdma only, it displays the LTE dBm???

Now that you mention it, I've gotten results I don't particularly understand either. Sorry if that was lame. Anybody know an app that's more accurate... or less buggy?
But the proof is in the pudding. 4g->3g drop and a loss of nearly 20 dBm just walking 5 feet into a house even just on cdma-only.Towers are multi use. All cell companies usually exist on every tower.
No, then it shows how crummy the 3G radio also is?![]()
No, then it shows how crummy the 3G radio also is?![]()

Truth.
And most of the "tower tracking websites" are SEVERELY outdated.
Give it a chance. Marketing made a statement.
We don't have a public statement from the engineers working on it!

Now that you mention it, I've gotten results I don't particularly understand either. Sorry if that was lame. Anybody know an app that's more accurate... or less buggy?
For me verizon is correct. Set the phone to 3g only and the dbm almost perfectly matches my droid x and thunderbolt numbers. Turn lte back on and the numbers are way off run a speed test though and it is definitly 4g speed. Smokes the x and the same speed as the thunderbolt. Even though the nexus says -108 and the thunderbolt says -93. Andatech has a video of this as well with a droid charge in debug so you can see its real lte signal matches what the nexus says but in the settings you can see the charge display something else.
Now that you mention it, I've gotten results I don't particularly understand either. Sorry if that was lame. Anybody know an app that's more accurate... or less buggy?
For me verizon is correct. Set the phone to 3g only and the dbm almost perfectly matches my droid x and thunderbolt numbers. Turn lte back on and the numbers are way off run a speed test though and it is definitly 4g speed. Smokes the x and the same speed as the thunderbolt. Even though the nexus says -108 and the thunderbolt says -93. Andatech has a video of this as well with a droid charge in debug so you can see its real lte signal matches what the nexus says but in the settings you can see the charge display something else.
So I just went for a drive with the app running and it didn't identify the correct location for any of the towers around here. I mean it wasn't even close to being correct. That sucks, I was hoping it would work better than that.

I think a lot of people here are confusing the issues
1. The Nexus is the ONLY phone that displays proper LTE signal anywhere in the OS. Android 2.3 does NOT support reporting LTE signal. All other phones JUST show the 4G icon when connected to 4G, but nothing else. Their signal strength bars are displaying CDMA strength. The Nexus is NOT displaying CDMA strength.
How is the about phone -> status not accurate? I set the phone to CDMA only mode. It also drops 20 dBm the second I set foot inside a structure. How is that not a problem with the phone?2. Unless you are ripping logcats from two Verizon devices, you do not have an accurate representation or understanding of comparative signal level. Just because you witness bars moving and dBM changing doesn't mean you have an accurate representation of what is going on.
Not in my case. I can walk inside, watch the 4G signal plummet then drop to a (barely acceptable) 3G signal. Then walk back outside and watch it flip back over to 4G. If the radio ISN'T problematic, why can't it handle a single exterior wall between me and the signal?3. The dropping 4G and being knocked down to 3G issue sounds exactly like the SIM authentication issues, and guess what, everybody is having them as every device succumbs to this every now and again. Yes, some more than others, and like the RAZR, this will have to be tweaked.
Really. So I should be getting -83 dBm 4G and 5 feet away inside a house I should get -115 dBm long enough for the phone to go "oh hell no" and switch to a (barely usable) 3G signal? How is that normal. I am willing to bet the Rezound does NOT do this. But I'm not willing to spend $35 to check only to get locked into the Rezound.4. Verizon isn't giving you the "run around for a crappy radio". The radio is fine as far as 4G performance goes.
Frankly, I don't feel bad at all. They are denying there are signal issues with it, when there clearly are compared to the razr and rezound. Why do people feel obligated to apologize for Samsung/Verizon on this? Samsung has a history of bad radios. Until they prove differently, they need to earn my respect. I was hoping this phone would do that, but all indications so far are that this radio is sub-par and now VZW would rather cover it up. If VZW cares so little about the Nexus (which MANY were using as an argument for why they weren't in a hurry to release it), why are they going to deny the signal problems MANY people are having?Sigh...here we go with everyone hating Verizon again.![]()


Huh. Do you know how that could happen?![]()
Their statement claimed it is not a signal problem but a problem with the # of displayed bars. Because # of bars being erroneously shown can cause the signal to drop so much walking 5 feet into a house that it degrades from 4g to 3g. I call BS. VZW is blowing smoke up our collective asses. But they have until 1/14 to fix it. I'll wait and see. But I'm really not expecting it to magically get fixed. The radio is just sub-par.