Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have searched for WiFi tether apps and found a few. One that looks good is WiFi Tether for Root.
Now can I use this with out getting in trouble or charged extra from Verizon?
I am rooted.
And as long as your not downloading over 8-10gb a month you'll be good .. I've been tethering since 09 and haven't been charged for it
I use FoxFi and it works great on my unrooted spectrum. Wifi Tether for Root Users never did work for me and thus I switched to FoxFi with the 'addon'.
I cannot avoid using any less than about 20gb per month with many months my data charges getting above 25gb and there has been a time or two where I was above 30gb of data used. There is not much I can avoid in being a "data hog" I use my phone quite a bit for work and there is a lot of downloading/uploading to the cloud.
To date I have never had verizon call me to say "STOP USING SO MUCH DATA!". However I do notice my phone going into 3G a lot more lately, wonder if this is Verizon throttling my data usage?
Verizon customers will soon have the option of downloading Android apps that let them turn their phone into a mobile hotspot –apps that Verizon blocked initially because it didn’t want customers circumventing its $20 a month mobile hot spot fee. The FCC has determined that nation’s largest wireless carrier was in the wrong in this situation because it had purchased spectrum back in 2008 that required Verizon to allow open access to its network. Thus Verizon has settled with the FCC and is offering a $1.25 million payment to the U.S. Treasury as a result of the FCC’s consent decree on this issue. The FCC also is saying that Verizon cannot charge customers on tiered data plans the $20 a month tethering fee, but it can charge it for those customers who are on an unlimited data plan. However, Verizon will not actually have a way to determine if customers are using one of these apps, so presumably any Android customer can download one of those apps and tether to their heart’s content.
Unfortunately for customers of AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile, which also charge fees on some plans to use the handset as a hotspot, the FCC’s consent decree was based on Verizon’s purchase of 700 MHz spectrum that came with a mandate that Verizon let other devices and applications run on that spectrum. So Verizon now has to notify Google that customers of Verizon Wireless can now access tethering apps such as Wireless Tether or PDANet, which has 6 million downloads.
So if it is illegal for Verizon to charge us for it, then should we not just use their app, as it will work better than another, would you not agree?
I'd be happy to notify the proper authorities of they add something to my bill...
I'm not sure you're 100% correct on the fcc ruling. They got into trouble because they restricted ability to use the phone as a wifi Hotspot without paying, when the agreement they entered into with the fcc for the higher spectrums was to allow full access.
I don't follow how you are rebuking what I said...
What was I wrong about?
Maybe You misunderstood my post but we are basically saying the same thing using different words. I said very clearly that the FCC ruling declared that blocking free MHS apps was forbidden and could no longer do it, and you said "They got into trouble because they restricted ability to use the phone as a wifi Hotspot without paying"
... and under previous parameters, it's not quite accurate. They only had a right to charge for the app if they also allowed it to be used for free. People can choose, as you said, to use VZNavigator over Google Navigation, but that's because they don't block other navigation apps from working. Stupid semantic reply on my part. My apologies.Verizon has every right under the law to charge you to use their mobile hotspot app, because it's your free choice to decide weather you want to use it or not. You are not being forced to, and therefore there is no violation of the law.
Yea, after reading it again, I realize we're saying the same thing. I saw this:
... and under previous parameters, it's not quite accurate. They only had a right to charge for the app if they also allowed it to be used for free. People can choose, as you said, to use VZNavigator over Google Navigation, but that's because they don't block other navigation apps from working. Stupid semantic reply on my part. My apologies.
I have to say, though, I'm a bit confused why they're not forced to allow it to ALL customers, rather than just those with new plans. It seems like VZ is trying to get people away from those unlimited data plans by squeezing us out little by little. I'll have to read the ruling sometime and see what it's all aboot.