Republicans on the House Administration Committee want to shore up voter registration rules in the wake of a Colorado study that found as many as 5,000 non-citizens in the state took part in last year
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Republicans on the House Administration Committee want to shore up voter registration rules in the wake of a Colorado study that found as many as 5,000 non-citizens in the state took part in last year
And if those 5000 people would have voted republican. Then they wouldnt have said anything and it would be the democrats crying about it. Dem or Rep dont care who votes. Just as long as the votes are for them.
And if those 5000 people would have voted republican. Then they wouldnt have said anything and it would be the democrats crying about it. Dem or Rep dont care who votes. Just as long as the votes are for them.
The point is if they thought the votes was in their favor then they would of kept their mouth shut about it.Votes in US are secret ballot, so the GOP reporting claiming 5,000 non-citizens voted, says nothing about who they voted for.
Those 5,000 non-citizens could have voted republican for all we know.
Votes in US are secret ballot, so the GOP reporting claiming 5,000 non-citizens voted, says nothing about who they voted for.
Those 5,000 non-citizens could have voted republican for all we know.
The point is if they thought the votes was in their favor then they would of kept their mouth shut about it.
No I am saying both sides would play dirty pool if they had a chance. Republicans and Democrats are no different as in the end they look out for their own wants and needs. Its almost like watching WWE where one side trash talks the other side but off camera they are all good friends.So is just automatically assumed fraudulent votes would be for democrats? What does that say about the democratic party?
So is just automatically assumed fraudulent votes would be for democrats? What does that say about the democratic party?
Really? They figured this out by comparing it to the driver license database?
I wonder how many of those 5000 don't have a driver's license, or a non-driver ID card?
Last I checked, it is not mandatory to have a state ID in order to be a citizen. In fact, last I checked, you only need to have been born here, or have gone through a naturalization process.
I guess I would have been counted a "Non-citizen voter" when I was stationed in Texas, as I had no Texan ID (I had a NYS one), but I was registered to vote in Texas.
So, I wonder how many were soldiers? How many were temporary residents, who still had an out-of-state license. I also wonder how many fell into other categories, like homeless (Who are still eligible citizens)
Who said it was calculated by looking at registered voters with no drivers license?
I'm pretty sure you have to claim weather your a resident or not when you get a drivers license, maybe their comparing voter registration to lists of people who DO have a drivers license, and have claimed not to be a resident.
This isn't as bad as the rigged voting machines in Nevada that stole the election from its rightful winner, Sharron Angle.