• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Anti-Obama ad in DC Metro

breadnatty08

pain rustique
Eesh, just caught this on the news.
Metro: Anti-Obama ad at Clarendon rail station is protected speech and will stay - The Washington Post
Have to say (as someone who rides the bus everyday and the Metro frequently), the system does have a large share of politically charged ads. The Humanist Society (I believe) often runs ads around Christmas time saying "be good for goodness sake", and some that compare Bible verses with those of famous secularists.
I know DC is a very political city, so it's no wonder these ads are popular. Anyone think this goes too far?
 
It's disrespectful of the office if not the man, but at the end of the day I'm for free speech .

As a society, we need to step back from the insanely increased vitriol of late in our political process before it's our undoing! Differences in opinion and rational debate are a good thing. Using the "other side sucks" as a strategy is not rational!
 
Completely agree pasta. I'm a diehard liberal, but am all for free speech. I love the fact that this city is so politically charged, it's a passion of mine.
I think it's another stone in building this huge wall that blocks any sort of reasoned discussion between parties (with Gov. Brewers "finger pointing"). I'm more than happy to discuss issues with conservatives, but to throw words out like "sucks" or "makes me want to throw up", or "go to hell" just doesn't help tackle the necessary issues of the day.
 
Eesh, just caught this on the news.
Metro: Anti-Obama ad at Clarendon rail station is protected speech and will stay - The Washington Post
Have to say (as someone who rides the bus everyday and the Metro frequently), the system does have a large share of politically charged ads. The Humanist Society (I believe) often runs ads around Christmas time saying "be good for goodness sake", and some that compare Bible verses with those of famous secularists.
I know DC is a very political city, so it's no wonder these ads are popular. Anyone think this goes too far?

Promoting a movie. Oh well.
 
I refer to it as pandering to the Jerry Springer crowd. I don't think it's a coincidence that the Fox family of networks brought us all these mean spirited shows like Hell's Kitchen, Judge Judy, American Idol with Simon Cowell, (just to name a few) and now all of the sudden we find our leaders trying to tap into that un-evolved reptilian part of our mind that seeks out confrontation, enjoys the misery of others. I wouldn't be surprised if it was a deliberate attempt to pander to the least common denominator and then pepper it with just enough right wing talking points to create an uber-echo chamber for the GOP.

If anyone watches Jon Stewart, you've probably seen the video that demonstrates this point.

http://www.hulu.com/watch/334631/th...rt-i-cant-believe-it-got-better#x-4,vclip,1,0

Video - Jon Stewart rips Fox News over their use of Republican Party talking points - National Political Buzz | Examiner.com
 
I'm a conservative. I'm not an Obama fan. There. It's out in open. The ad? I find it disgusting. I find it disrespectful to the office of the President. I find it disrespectful to our country. I find it to be lacking in patriotism.

In fact, if I still lived down there, I'd make a special trip down there, in the middle of the night, to pull the ad down. Shame on them. Shame.
 
Wow. My eyes actually did this ---->:eek:
when I read that last line. I can't believe that no one at the metro was like "umm... sorry. can't do it." and turned the ad down. I wouldn't say it's political, it's just crass.

Do you think this would have happened four years ago? If it said "Go to hell Bush" instead, do you think that maybe the people who yell "You Lie" at the President of the United States of America, would have been up in arms saying that this is disrespectful.

I guess it almost seems hypocritical. I really think the same people responsible for this ad would have been up in arms if it had happened to Bush. I just wish we could get past this whole '2-party' charade and focus on the issues. Blind fold all of Congress and make sure they can't meet up an coordinate their votes, and then maybe we'd make some progress.

It's sad really. :(
 
Do you think this would have happened four years ago? If it said "Go to hell Bush" instead, do you think that maybe the people who yell "You Lie" at the President of the United States of America, would have been up in arms saying that this is disrespectful.


I'm glad I'm not the only one that feels it's a new low in our country. Have you posted in this thread? http://androidforums.com/politics-current-affairs/490190-face-off-governor-vs-president.html Even if people don't think it has anything to do with the color of his skin (I wonder myself), I'd say that the respect we typically give a President has not bee met with this current President.
 
I'm a conservative. I'm not an Obama fan. There. It's out in open. The ad? I find it disgusting. I find it disrespectful to the office of the President. I find it disrespectful to our country. I find it to be lacking in patriotism.

In fact, if I still lived down there, I'd make a special trip down there, in the middle of the night, to pull the ad down. Shame on them. Shame.

I guess if the government could ban expression that it finds disgusting, disrespectful and lacking patriotism then I doubt there would be freedom of speech.

Btw, "In fact, if I still lived down there, I'd make a special trip down there, in the middle of the night, to pull the ad down." is protected speech, even if actually pulling the ad down would get one arrested.

I agree with the decision that the ad stays not only because it's freedom of speech, but it hurts the cause of those paying for the ad. <sweet> :D
 
What's wrong with our country?


Judge apologizes for forwarding a racist e-mail aimed at Obama - CNN.com

CNN said:
Montana's chief federal judge has offered his apologies for forwarding a racist e-mail aimed at President Barack Obama. Liberal advocacy groups demanded that U.S. District Judge Richard Cebull resign.
Cebull, in an interview Wednesday with the Billings Gazette newspaper, offered his regrets for forwarding the e-mail, saying it was "a hard lesson to learn."
"To say it's inappropriate and stupid is an extreme understatement," Cebull said in courthouse chambers on Wednesday, according to the newspaper. "There is no doubt it's racist. It wasn't forwarded for that purpose. If anything, it was political."
The Billings-based judge was named to the bench by President George W. Bush in 2001. He has been chief judge since 2008, overseeing two other full-time district judges, three senior or part-time judges and five magistrates. His chambers did not return a call from CNN for comment.
Cebull did not write the offensive material, but admitted forwarding the February 20 message to a few friends after it was sent to him by his brother. The Great Falls Tribune newspaper was given a copy and reported the message went:
"Normally I don't send or forward a lot of these, but even by my standards, it was a bit touching. I want all of my friends to feel what I felt when I read this. Hope it touches your heart like it did mine.
"A little boy said to his mother, 'Mommy, how come I'm black and you're white?' His mother replied, 'Don't even go there Barack! From what I can remember about that party, you're lucky you don't bark!'"
Obama is of mixed race.
Cebull said in the interview his conduct in court over many years has shown he is not a racist, but he admitted the public got that impression from the e-mail. "And I don't blame them," he added.
The judge also separately told the Great Falls Tribune, "The only reason I can explain it to you is I am not a fan of our president, but this goes beyond not being a fan. I didn't send it as racist, although that's what it is. I sent it out because it's anti-Obama."
Some legal organizations said the apology was not enough.
"If he has any respect for his office and for ideals of equality and human dignity on which our country was founded, Judge Cebull will step down today," said Bob Edgar, president and CEO of the left-leaning nonprofit Common Cause. "The message he has acknowledged circulating demonstrates a lack of judicial temperament that ought to disqualify him from further service."
It's rare and generally very difficult to force federal judges from office. They receive tenure, and the Constitution guarantees they can remain on the bench "during good behavior."
Standards warranting removal are not clear, beyond a violation of civil or criminal law. Congress would have to initiate impeachment proceedings, but the few judges to face that have usually resigned before those proceedings went far.
There is no indication the judge in Montana would be subjected to either option.
 
Wow. It's crazy that he thinks that anyone could in any way perceive that as political. Now, there could be some more to that email, but wow. Such poor taste. He definitely looks like a racist.

And I think it also goes to show more lack of respect for the office. I guess racial issues are not as much a thing of the past as we'd like to believe.
 
Honestly, what pisses me off the most:
DC still doesn't have official voting rights! And if we're ever voting for president it will ALWAYS be a Democrat. So, what I'm saying is, discourse is fine and grand for all those hill staffers who live in VA/MD, but I can talk until I'm dead about politics and in the end, I can't do anything about it. I love the city and the freedom of expression it allows (in regards to politics), I just wish we could express it in the form of voting.
 
What I find disgusting and disrespectful is what these temporary, hack politicians have done to our Constitution. Maybe if they actually followed it, there wouldn't be so much vitriol being thrown around.
 
Back
Top Bottom