DCJ1975
Member
Just watched a detailed review of the Pixel XL. No doubt nice device but other than I think it having one more gig of ram 4 vs 3 and what being $300 more, am I missing something major about it being $300 in superior value to the 6p? I'm just not seeing why I would spend the extra 300 over the 6p what so ever. The are almost identical in most areas it seems. If I'm missing something major the supports the $300 in price difference or market value supports it, pleaae let me know. Either Flagships are grossly overpriced or the 6p is one of the best deals and devices currently on the market for the money from the review I just watched. Sure the newly released software on the Pixel is cool but that and one more gig of ram, how on earth can you justify paying 700 for basically a branded name change of the Nexus 6p that has been given a non noticeable difference amount of ram and a reduced screen size. Screen size is subjective and not really a market value factor. My vote is the 6p as I saw not one thing that made me say to myself, I would like to have that device. Basically if you have the 6p, you've got a Pixel really. I've got to have missed something major