No, I didn't see it but I just read it from your link.
It confirms to me that I will not upgrade to this phone. There is too many other phones out there that are a bit better than this one. I was very suprised to read their review that you are actually losing real estate screen size on this phone with that menu.
I will keep my Orig Inc. I will agree that the Orig Inc is a hard phone to beat, excellent build quality, mine still works perfectly and with my 1500mh battery it lasts me all day of use. I will never forget the excitement back in May 2010 when the Orig Inc was released, I was apart of it on this forum and I'm afraid now nothing will put that spark back into my next purchase like the Orig Inc did.
I only brought that review up to see what people who have the phone think of it. From everything I've read on here, this reviewer's test unit was a fluke.
I read the comments on that article and there were a couple owners who disagreed vehemently. His response was that he knows build quality and if the unit he had is this bad it was a sign that either there were many like it and/or that the same creaking and such will happen on all of them with time. It's kind of a stupid view. Every model of phone will have a few duds, even unibody models. In that case EVERY phone wouldn't be worth buying. He mentioned that people should maybe consider the GNex, but how many times have we heard that phone called out for poor build quality.
In my opinion, the best built phones would be any that are of unibody construction (HTC One series, Droid Razr series, & iphone) simply because with no removable parts they are less likely to have flexxing/creaking issues, even though there will be some exceptions. After that, for Android OEMs would be, from best to worst, Moto, HTC, Samsung, and last LG (handled a few of their phones and was NOT impressed at all).
It's ironic him calling out HTC for using plastic on their phones when Samsung (which he touted as being better) are the king of plastic phones. The general consensus on them is that they have a plasticy, flimsy, cheap feel to them.
I think one of the commenters on there was correct. He likes bigger phones and can't see the point of owning a smaller one. For all the reviews I've seen & read, at this point about 75% are saying it's a good phone if you like smaller, but for only $50 more you could have an S3. So either this guy's right and 3/4 of the tech blog community is wrong, or he's just under the notion that if it's not the biggest it's not worth anything.