I wonder just how much of Android's popularity is due to the abundance of free or dirt cheap phones rather than some technical reason.
Probably a similar percentage to those who buy iPhones because they are popular, trendy and fashionable.
Most people are not likely concerned with the technicalities of the OS or hardware. They want Facebook, the web, email access, the mighty YouTube, access to their music and the like. If you give it to them in a cool package that costs them zero dollars, it is likely a given; they will go Android rather than iPhone.
Quite an over-generalization which does not explain iPhone's meteoric rise in the face of "free phones" that did, in fact, have all those features prior to android. Mind you, I agree that the vast majority of technology users do not care about the specifics.
So android grows and iPhone haters think it is because people think Android is technically superior and people care about the minutia, like who apparently stole some ideas from God knows where.
"So iOS grows and Android haters think it is because people think iOS is technically superior and people care about the minutia, like who apparently stole some ideas from God knows where."
You can't take part of a class with an extreme viewpoint and then use them as representative to compare to another class without committing logical fallacies. The truth is that most people who understand the technical aspects of both platform know that it is only in the minutiae where the differences can be argued, however irrelevant.
I'll will suggest if the iPhone were free or perhaps $19.95, you would see vastly more iPhone users out there compared to Android. And if Apple allowed iOS to be used by others, you would see far more iOS phones. And, if Apple gave iOS away for free, you would see even more iOS phones.
An interesting theory but wholly unprovable since that set of conditions will never occur.
Android's popularity is due in part to the fact that it is free. The OS is the most important part of the device.
Android is free, sort of, to the manufacturers. Motorola, Samsung, LG, HTC, etc still must pay licensing fees for many parts of the Android OS even though Google makes the source code freely available. But more to the point, whether or not the manufacturers pay for the OS is of no importance to a potential buyer when the deal for a new Thunderbolt, is pretty much the same out of pocket as an iPhone4. Sure, there are cheaper options available for Android devices, especially through subsidized low end handsets, but Apple also has the $99.00 iPhone 3GS and would probably see a bit of a price war between Verizon and AT&T for iPhone business if Apple permitted additional subsidies. It is after all, the contracts and not the phones where the carriers make their money.
Apple grows through innovation and knowing what people seem to want. Android does the same thing. The battle is interesting and we the people are the ultimate winners.
Actually Apple grows though marketing innovation to those who are willing to pay for it. And they are quite good at it.