Fallingwater
Newbie
I'm torn between two phones. One is a quadcore, the other one is an octa. There are other minor differences, and they don't cost the same. What I can't figure out is how much of a weight the additional four cores should have in my decision.
Octacores have been around for a while, but when they came out the general consensus was that no apps were paralleled enough that they'd actually use all eight cores, so the CPU would find itself with at least half of the cores idle most of the time. As a result, there was no noticeable increase in speed or response from the phone compared to a quadcore CPU of equivalent per-core power.
That was some time ago, though, and I'm wondering if the situation's stayed the same for what concerns app development and parallelization. In other words, would I see noticeable speed improvements from an octacore CPU now, all other things being equal? Can this difference be quantified in a practical manner - that is, not with just an Antutu number-crunching benchmark but in real-use terms?
Octacores have been around for a while, but when they came out the general consensus was that no apps were paralleled enough that they'd actually use all eight cores, so the CPU would find itself with at least half of the cores idle most of the time. As a result, there was no noticeable increase in speed or response from the phone compared to a quadcore CPU of equivalent per-core power.
That was some time ago, though, and I'm wondering if the situation's stayed the same for what concerns app development and parallelization. In other words, would I see noticeable speed improvements from an octacore CPU now, all other things being equal? Can this difference be quantified in a practical manner - that is, not with just an Antutu number-crunching benchmark but in real-use terms?