...some people on here say "yes, keep them to the same standards, regardless of physical ability" and then seem to say that, at the same time, women should be protected. And then they say that they're for equality...


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...some people on here say "yes, keep them to the same standards, regardless of physical ability" and then seem to say that, at the same time, women should be protected. And then they say that they're for equality...
Now, I guarantee someone is going to reply "how do you know he killed himself because it was gay sex, maybe he was just embarrassed for having sex on video." OH PLEASE SAVE THOSE STUPID REPLIES. If he was having straight sex, he would be considered a stud, and I guarantee he wouldn't have killed himself.
im going to call BS. just because other neanderthalic jacktards would have thought of him as a stud does not mean that he would not have still felt violated, nor that his reaction would have been any different. personally me myself i would be the one in jail as if i were taped having sex with a woman and had it streamed like that, i would have killed the person doing it. not every straight person is a cromagnon ****** that measures his manhood by where he has publicly stuck his dick.
OH GIVE ME A BREAK, this kid killed himself because it was a video of him having GAY SEX. How could you not realize that. I don't even understand why you would argue otherwise. If he was doing a girl, he would be alive today. END OF THAT.
oohh a declarative statement, then it must be so... i have intentionally avoided replying to a lot of things that you've said, but this really takes the cake. give me ONE piece of substancial evidence that the only reason he killed himself is that he was gay. i don't mean the typical liberal stand by of declaring it so it must be true or resorting to adhominum attacks.
for the record though i never said that wasn't why. i merely said you can not KNOW that that is why. i know that liberals like to put everyone in their nice neat little boxes, but here on planet reality peoplel just don't work like that.
Proof that what you claim as fact is actually fact, you can't do this of course, and that's why your argument is devoid of validity; it may be true, but if the only evidence is tainted by stupidity, there's no evidence at all.Provide you proof? Proof of what?...
Proof that what you claim as fact is actually fact, you can't do this of course, and that's why your argument is devoid of validity; it may be true, but if the only evidence is tainted by stupidity, there's no evidence at all.
If you're going to assert it as fact, yes. Or feel free to retract your previous statements, and be clear that it's your opinion.You want me to provide proof that someone secretly videotaping this kid having gay sex was the reason he committed suicide?...
Being fair minded, honest, reasonable and just, I think I would make a very good juror too; at least better somebody who shares your prejudices....Honestly, I hope those two students who did the video recording have 12 jurors just like you, so they can walk free...
Almost a shame (Reader discretion: punctuation may be missing from this sentence);)...I'm almost speechless...
Because that is not the position I've made any attempt to establish, or assert as fact; I could as reasonable suggest you provide proof that the pen on my desk right now is not blue....Why don't you provide proof that this being outed as gay via a gay sex video wasn't the reason.
It always amazes me how Samsung can make such good points then goes off on a half-drunken trolling tour.
Maybe listening to so much BS and idiocy from the right has finally gotten to him![]()
Although emotions can run high when debating something that you feel strongly about, remember that you are not debating someone else's intelligence (or lack thereof), background or location, but rather the topic itself and their position on the topic. For best results try to back up your assertions with some sort of evidence, and also be prepared to have others find evidence against your assertions and shoot holes in what you have said.
Personal attacks will just get threads closed or worse, so avoid attacking the messenger and stick to attacking the message. Infraction-able offenses are very gray in these types of threads so please stay as respectful as possible. We will try to just close the threads when out of hand.. but if members get too crazy-rude infractions will be passed out like normal.
Now, I guarantee someone is going to reply "how do you know he killed himself because it was gay sex, maybe he was just embarrassed for having sex on video." OH PLEASE SAVE THOSE STUPID REPLIES. If he was having straight sex, he would be considered a stud, and I guarantee he wouldn't have killed himself.
WelcomeWell thanks for both the compliment and the insult, both in the same statement.
Maybe but you keep pushing your point as if it is the entire truth.I don't think anything I've said qualifies as a drunken troll tour. I actually don't drink and type. That is never safe.
Not much of that where I live, apart from some random christian stationBtw you should listen to right wing talk radio. That stuff is fantastic, really gets your day going. I mean, I don't agree with most of the stuff they say, but they do bring lots of issues to the table. Especially Jon & Ken in the evenings, those guys are fantastic, until they go on one of their racist rants. They really hate mexicans and aren't shy about expressing so. I may be a liberal left wing democrat, but I do enjoy right wing talk radio. Bill handel is great too, now he sounds like a drunk troll, but he is comedy. Rush is just a jerk.
Maybe but back when I had paid sattelite, Faux used to be quite funnyHowever, I don't really like right wing tv. Fox is just garbage. I use to watch Bill Oreilly, but that guy never makes any sense. At least John and Ken make sense sometimes.
If you live in LA, check out KFI 640 AM. You will love it, even if you are a democrat like myself.
Definitely not in LA (thankfully)location said:Cork City, EU
Definitely not in LA (thankfully)
So I cant be a Democrat either![]()
As I see it, repeal is in order. The standard of non-fraternization should remain regardless of sexual orientation, and the standard for all soldiers should be performance. If you're a soldier you should be able to do your job in a superlative manner and hopefully inteligently. whether this means being a good manager, a competent pilot, or being able to haul your pack and fire that gun accurately an when the situation requires it. If you can't do that then who you're shooping it to in your own time doesn't make a hill of difference.
All men are created equal... at least under The Constitution. Then again... The Constitution isn't flawless.
Fair enough...2. In my opinion, my sex life (regardless of orientation) is my private business and no one (who is not a sexual partner) has any right to know about it...
Polygamy; I don't have any problem with, although I suspect they'd be practically unworkable....3. As far as equality goes, where do we draw the line? Should group marriages be legal? Should someone be allowed to marry their sister, brother, father, mother, first cousin, etc., etc.? Should someone be allowed to marry their cat, dog, donkey, sheep, goat? Is bestiality or serial raping a sexual orientation and therefore entitled to equality?Enquiring minds want to know...
Polygamy; I don't have any problem with, although I suspect they'd be practically unworkable.
Incest; I think there are some medical reasons this is a bad idea, I also would question how some pre-existing relationships might adversely effect the decision making process of some people; ie elder siblings having 'power' over younger, I just don't think it's a good idea.
Really?As far as medical reasons go, I read a study not to long ago that stated the effects of incest were not nearly as severe as previously believed.
(I live in Alabama... we read studies like that.... )
Really?
The problem is that many conditions which need a gene to be present in both mother and father to start are easy to happen (I believe CF is one of them) in this situation...