G.Nex Benchmark results

[McNulty]

Liquidsmooth v1.25
Franco kernel milestone 2

AnTuTu - 6522
Quadrant - 3700

IMO liquidsmooth is exactly that... very responsive and best rom I've used to date.

What do u guys think?

 

[Eleer]

Flashed it, and though it had a ton of customizations, I went back to Codename Android 1.6. Codename is the best ROM out, in my opinion. Liquid seemed choppy for me at times compared to CA.

(Regardless of what I just said, Liquid is a good ROM.)

 

[McNulty]

OK so I updated my ROM to LiquidSmooth v1.3 which comes with Franco kernel. I set all my setting to the same as before and my results have dramatically decreased...

AnTuTu- 4234
Quadrant-3131

What's goin on here? Any thoughts?

 

[Demache]

OK so I updated my ROM to LiquidSmooth v1.3 which comes with Franco kernel. I set all my setting to the same as before and my results have dramatically decreased...

AnTuTu- 4234
Quadrant-3131

What's goin on here? Any thoughts?

If you just flashed the ROM I would give it some time to balance itself out. It might be doing other things in the background that's taking CPU time away from the benchmark.

 

[Turdbogls]

OK so I updated my ROM to LiquidSmooth v1.3 which comes with Franco kernel. I set all my setting to the same as before and my results have dramatically decreased...

AnTuTu- 4234
Quadrant-3131

What's goin on here? Any thoughts?

you are paying too much attention to benchmarks...can you really tell a difference between the 2 ROM's speed wise? probably not.
dont look into benchmarks too much...real world use is where its at. i can crank up my phone to 1.4ghz and blow up quadrant with 4000 scores...but does it feel any faster than when i had it at 1.2ghz? no