I thought obama was supposed to be transparent?

[hakr100]

Don't worry about it, it went right over your head...or read some of what I've said here and you'll see that the whole "bush did it too" rubs me the wrong way.

Me, too. Bush was a far, far worse president than Obama is. To compare Obama's shortcomings to Bush's is very insulting to Obama.

 

[IOWA]

Me, too. Bush was a far, far worse president than Obama is. To compare Obama's shortcomings to Bush's is very insulting to Obama.

Lol? Seriously? See that way out there in the distance? Better go catch it. It's your credibility.

 

[hakr100]

Please. Bush II was the worst president in modern U.S. history. There are long, long lists of his big time failures, ranging from 9-11, his response to it, his simple-minded religious beliefs he pushed onto us to the environment, his response to Katrina, to health care costs, to the economy, to his anti-science stances, et cetera, so forth and so on, ad infinitum. To Bush's credit, he did expand spending on AIDs research.

 

[Fenga Papit]

Familiar with ultra-conservative christians who want to prevent women from obtaining abortions, and who want to blow up abortion clinics and kill abortion providers? They want their law in parts of America where they have strong numbers.

"Want" to? You read minds, do ya? Several liberals have admitted to posing as Tea Party supporters at rallies to yell crazy train slogans and racial epithets, all to try and make the Tea Party look bad. Given this, it is just as feasible that these people you accuse are of your own ilk. Like your savior taught for three years from the words of your bible "Rules For Radicals": "By any means necessary."

Here's a bit of recent christian sharia:

She was teaching at a private Christian school. Who'd a thunk they would hold their employees to their values? And you don't understand the word "sharia."

Epic fail on your part. Now, how do you feel about a Muslim madrassa?

The woman is lucky Principal Jon Ennis didn't force her into the school's courtyard so she could be stoned to death.

Prove that Christians in America today stone people. Or is this just another of your smears against those that you don't agree with? I get it, you are showing the real values of the party of tolerance....

Homosexualize America?

How? Are gays going to be knocking on our front doors and same-sex-raping whoever opens the door?

Familiar with Kevin Jennings?

[FONT=times new roman,times]In a 1990 "report" for the Massachusetts Governor's Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth, it was Jennings himself who re-coined the very term "safe school" to mean a pro-homosexual school.Just as the word "gay" is forever tainted and can now rarely be used in its original sense without prompting the snickers or confusion of the listener, so the term "safe school" is now a post-op product of Jennings that bears no similarity to its original meaning.

[/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times]His national template, used over and over in hundreds of districts and thousands of schools across the country, is to fabricate an epidemic of bullying and violence to homosexuals in schools, in part by citing bogus census or other statistics where classes of people are conflated to come-up with artificially high numbers of incidents of sexual-orientation-based "bullying", "harassment" or violence. [/FONT]

[FONT=times new roman,times]The next step is to contend that the only solution is to make "allies" out of 100% of the straight students in the school or district. "Allies" are made by implementing a usually district-wide "safe-schools" or "anti-bullying" curriculum that force-feeds homosexual propaganda to kindergarten through 12th grade.
[/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]While there is much controversy even among secular mental health professionals as to whether or not homosexuality is disordered, there is no such controversy as to heterosexuality. This is an additional, secular reason that all lifestyles should therefore not enjoy parity in school curricula. Why do the Jennings types fear the presentation of research data from all sides, rather than just their own? If indeed Jennings and company valued academic freedom and fearless intellectual inquiry, they would also present the findings of these prominent doctors, who have a lot of studies to back up their positions.

The term "ally", a play on Jennings' Gay-Straight Alliance, is another buzzword which denotes a straight student who worships LGBT's and unequivocally endorses their lifestyle, and who reports on any student who so much as voices an opposition to homosexuality. Such voiced opposition is punished as the "bullying" of a "hater". "Ally of the month" awards are then handed-out at monthly school assemblies.[/FONT]

American Thinker: Kevin Jennings' twisted terminology

It gets "better" -

The "Fistgate" conference:
HERE'S what homosexual activists in schools do with children . . .

Students as young as 12 given graphic instruction in bizarre homosexual sex acts by state employees (and we were there to record it for the world)


Have you wondered what homosexual activists do when they are alone with kids in the tax-funded

 

[IOWA]

"Want" to? You read minds, do ya? Several liberals have admitted to posing as Tea Party supporters at rallies to yell crazy train slogans and racial epithets, all to try and make the Tea Party look bad. Given this, it is just as feasible that these people you accuse are of your own ilk. Like your savior taught for three years from the words of your bible "Rules For Radicals": "By any means necessary."

She was teaching at a private Christian school. Who'd a thunk they would hold their employees to their values? And you don't understand the word "sharia."

Epic fail on your part. Now, how do you feel about a Muslim madrassa?


Prove that Christians in America today stone people. Or is this just another of your smears against those that you don't agree with? I get it, you are showing the real values of the party of tolerance....

Familiar with Kevin Jennings?

American Thinker: Kevin Jennings' twisted terminology

It gets "better" -

The "Fistgate" incident

"Homosexuality is normal" is being forced on students of all ages in our schools. Not just homosexuality, but fetishes in sexual relations are presented as normal, making students feel they should go out and perform these acts to be "normal."

Homosexuality is not normal. It's not how we were/are created.

Please. Bush II was the worst president in modern U.S. history. There are long, long lists of his big time failures, ranging from 9-11, his response to it, his simple-minded religious beliefs he pushed onto us to the environment, his response to Katrina, to health care costs, to the economy, to his anti-science stances, et cetera, so forth and so on, ad infinitum. To Bush's credit, he did expand spending on AIDs research.

Yep bush is worse because 9/11 was his fault. Right, he should have E.S.P.

Simple-minded religious beliefs? Pushed on to us how? I don't remember them being pushed on to us. And like it or not, this nation was a CHRISTIAN founded nation. Want proof? Look at your money.

Response to katrina? There was ample warning, people were told to get the eff outta town. They didn't. It was their own fault.

Health care costs? Obama is effectively going to kill health care for everyone. Period.

Anti-Science stance? Where?

Quit spewing blind rhetoric son. Guess you didn't catch up to your credibility yet, huh?

 

[hakr100]

Homosexuality is not normal. It's not how we were/are created.

I'm sorry, I guess I missed the post in which you outlined your C.V., the one that would qualify you to make such a pronouncement.

Oh, and how were we created, and what proof do you have to back that up?

 

[hakr100]

Simple-minded religious beliefs? Pushed on to us how? I don't remember them being pushed on to us. And like it or not, this nation was a CHRISTIAN founded nation. Want proof? Look at your money.

Look at my money? You mean the motto, "In God We Trust"?

First, the founders of this nation were long-dead before that motto appeared on a coin...that was in 1864. And it didn't become the motto of the United States until 1956. Second, the phrase doesn't refer to a Christian god...it simply refers to a god. Third, this country was most definitely NOT founded as a christian nation. Fourth, and most important, christianity, like all religions, is a creation of man, not god. If you think otherwise, I invite you to prove it.

Oh, please don't cite the bible as proof. The bible is a creation of man. To cite it as proof is nothing more than tautology.

 

[MK_9]

Please. Bush was a moron, a wooden-headed puppet manipulated by dick cheney. Obama is far from perfect, but he inherited an incredible mess from Bush, and considering that the Republicans in Congress are doing everything they can to stymie him, I'm amazed he has posted any significant accomplishments, and he has.

I don't see anyone on the GOP side who would do half as well as Obama for this country. About all the Republicans would do is further destroy what remains of the middle class in order to further enrich the wealthy, just like they always do.

Please. You could hand pick 95% of anyone in this country to stand around, look like an idiot, read off a teleprompter and do far better than that tool has done.

And I hate to clue you in on this little tidbit, but if you're too blind to see, your messiah there? He and all his friends are "wealthy". What? Rahm Emanuel isn't rich. Oops! Wait, hedge fund millionaire. Yeah, but Eric Holder isn't....oh wait, millionaire lawyer. I promise you, the list goes on...and on. Psst, those dirty Goldman Sachs folks? Yeah...plenty of appointed people in offices relating to the white house. If you're so naive to ignore the fact that they're doing for them? Well, that's just plain old disturbing.

 

[Fenga Papit]

Don't forget that BP gave Oilbama their largest amount of donations! And Shrieker Pelosi promised the most ethical congress ever!

Must be why the Congressional Black Caucus is afraid of getting caught in ethics probes and are demanding that Pelosi re-write the rules.

 

[hakr100]

Please. You could hand pick 95% of anyone in this country to stand around, look like an idiot, read off a teleprompter and do far better than that tool has done.

And I hate to clue you in on this little tidbit, but if you're too blind to see, your messiah there? He and all his friends are "wealthy". What? Rahm Emanuel isn't rich. Oops! Wait, hedge fund millionaire. Yeah, but Eric Holder isn't....oh wait, millionaire lawyer. I promise you, the list goes on...and on. Psst, those dirty Goldman Sachs folks? Yeah...plenty of appointed people in offices relating to the white house. If you're so naive to ignore the fact that they're doing for them? Well, that's just plain old disturbing.

Psst...here's a hint...almost everyone in national politics these days is wealthy, except maybe Joe Biden.

We do pretty good in this household, too.

I don't view wealth as a disqualification for public service.

 

[hakr100]

Don't forget that BP gave Oilbama their largest amount of donations! And Shrieker Pelosi promised the most ethical congress ever!

Must be why the Congressional Black Caucus is afraid of getting caught in ethics probes and are demanding that Pelosi re-write the rules.

Sorry, I couldn't find a nice new animated BIG YAWN for this post of yours...

 

[Zenze]

I don't view wealth as a disqualification for public service.

True but I think it sucks that in most cases you have to be pretty wealthy to get elected to any major office. Honestly I like the way that the British are required to run their campaigns.... also the fact that they don't have a 2 party system...

 

[hakr100]

True but I think it sucks that in most cases you have to be pretty wealthy to get elected to any major office. Honestly I like the way that the British are required to run their campaigns.... also the fact that they don't have a 2 party system...

When Americans are willing to provide a decent amount of money from the public treasury for campaigns and advertising for public office, and at the same time are willing to totally outlaw campaign contributions of any kind, then we will have a chance of doing what you want.

I don't see it happening.

As for a "many party" system, I'm not a fan of that.

I do like the British parliamentary system, though...the quick elections, the votes of confidence, et cetera. Had we had the latter, we could have dumped Bush and his criminal controller, Cheney, before their terms were over.

 

[3devious]

Sorry, I couldn't find a nice new animated BIG YAWN for this post of yours...

Yes, your contributions to most discussions are sorry once you've run out of talking points provided by movement of "everyone who questions what the administration is doing is a bunch of christian fundamentalist, racist haters!" That is worthy of the big yawn that you seem to think is your witty rebuttal to everything you disagree with.

 

[hakr100]

Au contraire. I think it is important for Americans to question what their politicians are doing, but i also think it is important to do it reasonably, and without the cultural-racial-religious slurs that are far too common these days.

I don't take seriously these sorts of comments:

"Don't forget that BP gave Oilbama their largest amount of donations! And Shrieker Pelosi promised the most ethical congress ever!

Must be why the Congressional Black Caucus is afraid of getting caught in ethics probes and are demanding that Pelosi re-write the rules"

 

[ballisticn8]

Au contraire. I think it is important for Americans to question what their politicians are doing, but i also think it is important to do it reasonably, and without the cultural-racial-religious slurs that are far too common these days.

I don't take seriously these sorts of comments:

"Don't forget that BP gave Oilbama their largest amount of donations! And Shrieker Pelosi promised the most ethical congress ever!

Must be why the Congressional Black Caucus is afraid of getting caught in ethics probes and are demanding that Pelosi re-write the rules"

that type of response is typical from you i guess...

earlier in this very thread you called bush a wooden headed moron and in the same sentence you mentioned Dick "Call Me Darth" Cheney and then you want to go whine about not taking seriously others comments.

typical hypocrite response that everyone has come to expect from you i guess, ball up and look for a yawn image or play the you call people names and I cant take those responses seriously although i do the same thing.

Here hakr, i have an image for you:

 

[3devious]

Au contraire. I think it is important for Americans to question what their politicians are doing, but i also think it is important to do it reasonably, and without the cultural-racial-religious slurs that are far too common these days.

That's reasonable. We really should have a lot more respect for our officials and certain public servants certainly should make an effort to be more respectable (it doesn't matter that the annoying cameraman probably was a plant from the republican party, he was acting no different from Michael Moore and you shouldn't have gotten physical.)

Don't you all just feel like kicking your own asses when we try to tell children to grow up and behave while this nonsense is going on? If I had kids, the little brats would look at me and say "and which grownups would those be? Do you mean Glen Beck or our president who wants to 'kick some ass?'" Yeah, even my imaginary children are insufferable.

 

[hakr100]

earlier in this very thread you called bush a wooden headed moron and in the same sentence you mentioned Dick "Call Me Darth" Cheney and then you want to go whine about not taking seriously others comments.

Indeed I did. Bush is a wooden headed moron, and Cheney should be in prison.

Have a nice day.

 

[ballisticn8]

So once again you find it perfectly acceptable to call political figures whom you do not like or do not agree with their views names but then when someone does the same to insult your preferred candidate you throw out the "I refuse to respond to someone that makes those types of derogative comments" post?

Like Iowa said, your credibility is kind of getting away from you, maybe fix your own posts before you try to call others out for what they write eh?

 

[hakr100]

So once again you find it perfectly acceptable to call political figures whom you do not like or do not agree with their views names but then when someone does the same to insult your preferred candidate you throw out the "I refuse to respond to someone that makes those types of derogative comments" post?

Like Iowa said, your credibility is kind of getting away from you, maybe fix your own posts before you try to call others out for what they write eh?

Once again, au contraire. I like Dubya. I simply think he was an awful president. His presidency was a failure, as evidence by the mess we are in today.

As for Cheney, well, I've already stated I believe him to be a criminal.

 

[Fenga Papit]

Sorry, I couldn't find a nice new animated BIG YAWN for this post of yours...

You certainly are sorry, I'll give you that. This is the only response you could have because you could not defend Oilbama or Pelosi in that post. Everyone can see that.

Au contraire. I think it is important for Americans to question what their politicians are doing, but i also think it is important to do it reasonably, and without the cultural-racial-religious slurs that are far too common these days.

I don't take seriously these sorts of comments:

"Don't forget that BP gave Oilbama their largest amount of donations! And Shrieker Pelosi promised the most ethical congress ever!

Must be why the Congressional Black Caucus is afraid of getting caught in ethics probes and are demanding that Pelosi re-write the rules"

Your hypocritical whining fools no one except the simple minded and yourself.

 

[IOWA]

I guess candidates/political officers have to equal obama's "standards" to not get called names. You know, taking vacations during critical times, spending more than any other president in history, expanding welfare programs so the lazy can stay at home and live off the government. And hell, let's give them healthcare too!(thank god that was blocked). Also someone who lies about what religion they practice so they can win an election, and make empty promises and promote socialism. That's the kind of person hakr endorses

Tapatalk. Samsung Moment. Yep.

 

[MK_9]

Please show me the proof of this. I've googled the question, and multiple sources including a reputable newspaper have reported that he is a christian.

His father was muslim, but his mother raised him christian. Apparently his father decided to no longer be a muslim before Barack was even born.

And don't argue that I should be the one to find the proof; it's your argument, you back it up.


And anyway, what does it matter if he were a muslim? I thought you were intelligent, it seems you're just another bigot.

YouTube - Get the Race Card Advantage (PJTV's 'Left Exposed')

 

[IOWA]

Awesome video haha

Tapatalk. Samsung Moment. Yep.

 

[hakr100]

Funniest video I've seen lately is of that moron congressman from texas, apologizing yesterday to BP. He sorta apologized for his apology, but his outburst should haunt him the rest of his life.