http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/14/android-isnt-really-open-its-just-less-closed-than-apple/
What do you guys think about the iBoobs situation? Should Google have restricted the app as highly mature? And does Google's action go backwards on their 'Open Source Project' and make them only less closed than Apple?
My opinion is in the comments section of the article by 'Michael'. But my take on this article is that Android's 'Open Source Project' wasn't meant for having just any app in the Market. It's not called the 'Open App Project'. I don't think Apple fanboys understand that 'Open Source' is what it is; the 'source' is 'open'. So manufacturers and developers alike can work on the actual source of Android to make a better user experience. Not develop a porno app and be able to have it in the Market.
So what do you think? Does restricting iBoobs really mean that Android isn't open?
What do you guys think about the iBoobs situation? Should Google have restricted the app as highly mature? And does Google's action go backwards on their 'Open Source Project' and make them only less closed than Apple?
My opinion is in the comments section of the article by 'Michael'. But my take on this article is that Android's 'Open Source Project' wasn't meant for having just any app in the Market. It's not called the 'Open App Project'. I don't think Apple fanboys understand that 'Open Source' is what it is; the 'source' is 'open'. So manufacturers and developers alike can work on the actual source of Android to make a better user experience. Not develop a porno app and be able to have it in the Market.
So what do you think? Does restricting iBoobs really mean that Android isn't open?


