lol @ 1st year philosophy students..
We have a CIA agent saying they were partnered and funded startup, we have the department of defense announcing further partnerships using defense budget funding, and we have proof via payroll sheets that they obtained CIA money through Keyhole and In-Q-Tel.. etc.
Throw out a few more red herrings for the lulz.
Does the CIA work with Google... uhhh.. yeah. The CIA works with lots of technology companies, the CIA didn't develop and manufacturer all those cool gadgets and technologies on their own.
But working with, and licensing technology from is a far cry from being a front. I think this is a case of you not really understanding business relationships and how the world works.
Lets see, Google obtained money from the CIA via In-Q-Tel... why would that be?
In-Q-Tel of Arlington, Virginia, United States is a not-for-profit venture capital firm that invests in high-tech companies for the sole purpose of keeping the Central Intelligence Agency equipped with the latest in information technology in support of United States intelligence capability.[4]
Huh... its seems In-Q-Tel is the investment arm of the CIA, the financial vehicle they use to invest in companies making technology they might find useful... hmm... And their investments are on the books, we know they invested in google because... the CIA is really bad at keeping secrets? OR... is it not a secret, that the CIA invests in technology companies?
Again, investing in, and buying technology from is far different than being a front.