• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Joe Paterno/Penn State scandal, your thoughts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TxGoat
  • Start date Start date
What is sad about this is no one went to the police. Why? Because it is a cover up. From the top all the way to down.
 
Make all the excuses you want for him, but the simple fact is he had a pedophile on his coaching staff and he was already alerted that someone saw him raping a boy. Legally he did what he should've, morally I don't think so and that's my only thoughts on his actions.

Ask yourself this, if you're a parent and one of your children were one of the victims, do you think Joe Paterno did enough?

Flat out appeal to emotion much? Not really a good way to form an argument. If these were my kids I would want Paterno to hunt the guy down and torture him to death. Then I'd want him to tell me so I could give him a rock solid alibi. I'd also want him to do the same to McQueary for not stopping it at the time. By that logic if Paterno had reported it to the police at the time it would not have been enough.
 
My take on the whole situation is this: they all should be fired, even McQueary. This whole event is like a slow-mo Bystander Effect. Each person passed the buck thinking the next person would be the one to do the right thing. Accusations against Sandusky or not, this wasn't a Fatty Arbuckle situation here of one word against another. This was multiple people having witnessed various events over a period of 13 years. The grand jury report for anyone with a strong stomach:

Grand Jury Report on Sandusky

Another site has a sort of condensed version of the Grand Jury Report that really drives home how weird this whole thing is:

Who knew what about Jerry Sandusky

Most telling to me is how the Bystander Effect gets shifted to the next person and they downgrade the severity of Sandusky's actions.

"According to the grand jury, then, here is how McQueary
 
My take on the whole situation is this: they all should be fired, even McQueary. This whole event is like a slow-mo Bystander Effect. Each person passed the buck thinking the next person would be the one to do the right thing. Accusations against Sandusky or not, this wasn't a Fatty Arbuckle situation here of one word against another. This was multiple people having witnessed various events over a period of 13 years. The grand jury report for anyone with a strong stomach:

Grand Jury Report on Sandusky

Another site has a sort of condensed version of the Grand Jury Report that really drives home how weird this whole thing is:

Who knew what about Jerry Sandusky

Most telling to me is how the Bystander Effect gets shifted to the next person and they downgrade the severity of Sandusky's actions.

"According to the grand jury, then, here is how McQueary’s eyewitness account became watered down at each stage:

McQueary: anal rape.
Paterno: something of a sexual nature.
Schultz: inappropriately grabbing of the young boy’s genitals.
Curley: inappropriate conduct or horsing around.
Spanier: conduct that made someone uncomfortable.
Raykovitz: a ban on bringing kids to the locker room."

Everyone involved that knew is morally responsible and doing the bare minimum only got 8 children molested or raped. As for Joe, I was more under the impression that they fired him not because of how much he did, but how much he has been blabbing to his fans since things came to light.

Joe addresses fans - YouTube

This does not seem like the kind of person that appears appalled at what has happened. In fact, he seems to relish the attention and this is the kind of PR Penn State doesn't need since in most cases like these, the organization will address the press for those involved rather than someone like Joe himself. He was probably fired just because of all the media spectacle rather than definitive involvement since the Grand Jury believed he met his legal obligation (though not a moral one).




That's my main point, at what point does he ask himself, "ok I know going to the authorities is going to be a huge distraction to our organization, but what this guy did is one of the most disgusting things someone can do to a child." I think he was just trying to wash his hands of it so it doesn't distract from his program. He did the least he was obligated to do for the sake of his program which IMO isn't moral. Legally, he's in the clear. Morally, I don't see how you can say he's in the clear knowing what he knew when he knew it and several other children are victimized after the fact.
 

This to me is even more telling of his guilt. You see this with criminals that have gotten away with their crimes so long that they actually rationalize it away. Of course, he was just horsing around. Those kids are out to get him. Why? What would compel eight kids (possibly more from what I hear) to come out against him? Why would there need to be a three year investigation into his behavior to determine if they were going to bring charges against him?

Sandusky has truly lost all touch with reality if he thinks he's innocent. Is he sexually attracted to young boys? No, he just enjoys young people. As if we couldn't see the double meaning there. There's even subtle hints about this kind of crap in his autobiography. This has to be the least kept secret criminal activity in the history of mankind. With everything against him, anything less than a guilty verdict will be an outrage.
 
This to me is even more telling of his guilt. You see this with criminals that have gotten away with their crimes so long that they actually rationalize it away. Of course, he was just horsing around. Those kids are out to get him. Why? What would compel eight kids (possibly more from what I hear) to come out against him? Why would there need to be a three year investigation into his behavior to determine if they were going to bring charges against him?

Sandusky has truly lost all touch with reality if he thinks he's innocent. Is he sexually attracted to young boys? No, he just enjoys young people. As if we couldn't see the double meaning there. There's even subtle hints about this kind of crap in his autobiography. This has to be the least kept secret criminal activity in the history of mankind. With everything against him, anything less than a guilty verdict will be an outrage.


Bob Costas FULL interview with Jerry Sandusky - YouTube


Damn this guy is just creepy....
 
It's obvious Sandusky has issues. He sees no fault in his actions. I'm glad to see Mike Mcqueary did more than just walk away. But with all this talking Sandusky doing, he might have just sealed his doom.
 
It's obvious Sandusky has issues. He sees no fault in his actions.

Well, once busted he is saying such things. My guess is that he's just trying to minimize his actions as a part of the legal denials he's going to be spending the rest of his life doing.

There has already been one victim making the statement that he was "astounded" by Sandusky's remarks about that.

Call me old fashioned, but to me "horsing around" is snapping somebody on the fanny with a wet wound up towel, not showering with them nude and .. doing something that got the attention of a co-worker who felt inclined to immediately report it.
 
Legendary Penn State coach Paterno dead at 85 - CNN.com

The only remorse I find myself experiencing is that some victims may not get the closure they deserve since one of the parties now won't be able to give their story. Many people are still celebrating his triumphs, but I think having a predator among his staff practically nullifies all his accomplishments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: B2L
Sometimes a comedic headline can help with the understanding of something like the (quite proper) Paterno firing. From The Onion:

Joe Paterno Dies In Hospital; Doctors Promise To Tell Their Superiors First Thing Tomorrow



lol, as much as you want to have respect for someone in their passing, you still feel bad about the lives that their actions negatively affected.

I read a comment somewhere about his passing, why attempt chemo treatment on such an advanced aged body? I've heard some people describe chemotherapy as hell. At such an advanced age isn't it best just to go ahead and live out your remaining years without going through the hell of chemo? I can't help but wonder if the chemotherapy was more along the lines of a mercy killing for having to deal with the shame of it all.
 
Yeah, TxGoat. My wife, an oncology spcialist RN, was aghast when she read of the chemo for him. He could have lived for many months longer and been more comfortable with just ordinary cares and no chemotherapy.
 
Back
Top Bottom