• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Long Term Android Support

This is why I bought my Evo 4G: ROMs and Kernels Download Page

Sprint says my phone goes EOL this month, but the development community has proven that this phone has lots of life left. How many 3rd party ROMs and Kernels are available for the iPhone? I don't remember seeing any of this mentioned in the article.
 
I know the RIZR was not Android. However, to do a few things, you had to use Motorola's software and it was $50 at the time to get the software from Motorola.

I remember using BitPim to get around V's crap on an LG!
Verizon is liable to do all kinds of nasty things Motorola, LG or anyone (but Apple) cannot control if they want to continue doing business with VZ.

But I gotta think a RIZR from years ago has nothing to do with anything today, including Moto's current policies.
 
I just saw this article regarding the long-term support and upgrades to Android phones. I haven't researched enough about the history of android devices to be able to fairly judge the authenticity of the information, so I was hoping for everyone's thoughts on the matter/

Here is the article: the understatement: Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support

The thing is about this chart is that it's accurate and inaccurate simultaneously.

How it is accurate: The more popular an Android device is, the more likely the manufacturer will be to update. That's why the Nexus, the Droid (aka OG Droid), the Droid Incredible (aka Dinc), and the Evo 4G have pretty good upgrade records. They are popular devices, and Google would be damned if their device didn't get updated often.

Here is how it's not accurate: A lot of those phones did not sell too many. Also, I'd like to know what the author defines as "a major update'. Going from 2.1 to 2.2 (Eclair to Froyo) is a major update. Going from 2.2 to 2.2.1 (a patch to Froyo) is not, IMO. And certainly not 2.3.3 to 2.3.4, to 2.3.5. Which, I think the current Gingerbread version is 2.3.7. Google makes a lot of small updates. Can you really expect manufacturers to keep up and pass the carrier's stress testing?

So, my advice: Get a good quality phone that is popular if you're really worried about updates. The Nexus line will get updates as long as the hardware can support it. The Verizon Droid series is also really good at getting updated. Sprint's Evo line gets updates regularly. The SGS2 will very likely be updated, due to it's popularity. So expect to pay $200 + 2year contract to get a good phone that will be supported for at least 18 months. You'll be happier than getting a cheaper phone that isn't getting updated because it's a low priority for the manufacturer.
 
where is it? I want to read the report... BBC - Search results for htc watchdog
it appears I'm wasting my license fee

It was on the box a few weeks ago.

Have you tried using google? We have google phones. Heres what I found at the first result if I do your work for you. Sorry to burst your bubble. BBC - Watchdog: HTC: is their customer service 'quietly brilliant'?

Ofcourse not everyone is unhappy with them (like you said). In fact I'm quite jealous of a colleaugues handset (another quick google - he has the Desire HD) & I'm the one who goes prepay then roots it (voids warranty).

:rolleyes: ;)
 
I know a number of iPhone owners for whom upgrading their iPhone 3G to iOS 4 was something they regretted. The performance of iOS 4 on the 3G was piss poor. Upgrades make sense only if they make sense.

[Warning: American perspective here, which I think I share with the original blogger]
That said, I do think that carriers should roll out Android updates sooner, but I disagree with the assertion in the blog post that carriers are in the same business situation as Apple is in. Apple is a hardware manufacturer and wants you to be happy with Apple hardware. Verizon, Sprint, AT&T, and T-Mobile are wireless providers. They know they have you locked into a contract (as most people are) for two years, and a lot of people don't want to switch carriers because it's too much trouble and they want to be grandfathered into an unlimited plan or a lower contract price. The carriers have very little incentive to push software upgrades to phones.

I know people will say "Yeah, but it's really HTC or Motorola or Samsung making the update, not the carrier." Well, then why don't they let you download the update yourself and push it yourself? Why is it still up to the carrier to push? I know a lot of situations in which an upgrade has been officially released but not pushed to all phones. That is up to the carrier. You can't say the carrier isn't the one pushing it, especially since a lot of the bloatware in the Android roms you get on phones is bloatware from the carrier and not the handset manufacturer.

The real problem is that Google made Android "open" to handset manufacturers, and then handset manufacturers and wireless carriers made it closed to users (with the exception of the relatively miniscule number of users who root their phones). Android isn't "open" if you don't have root access (all contract-sold phones) or if you can't uninstall bloatware apps (all contract-sold phones) or if you can't choose to enable software installation from unknown sources (AT&T phones).

I love my current phone (MyTouch 4G) because I rooted it and installed Cyanogen on it. Cyanogen has been an excellent experience and pretty much updated almost immediately. When this phone outlives its usefulness or I'm eligible for an upgrade and just curious about what's new (maybe in two years or so), I'm definitely going for the Nexus line.

I don't mind rooting my phone, but I'd prefer not having to in order to get both a vanilla Android experience and timely software upgrades.
 
well I hope to get ICS on my Legend and if performance is poor, at least I, unlike out iOS friends can downgrade to Gingerbread again
 
Back
Top Bottom