• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

New face of the Democrats!

Status
Not open for further replies.
ht_alvin_greene_mug_100609_mn.jpg



You just can't make this stuff up! Liberals in South Carolina voted for Alvin Greene to represent their wonderful core beliefs and values in the senate race as their nominee. The 32 year old Greene is unemployed and lives with his parents.

Liberals are proud to have Greene represent them, complete with his pending felony charges for "disseminating, procuring or promoting obscenity" in Richland County, S.C.

The U.S. Senate candidate was captured on video surveillance Nov. 4 trying to show "obscene photographs from a website" to a female victim on the University of South Carolina campus and go to her room without her consent, according to the affidavit.
South Carolina Senate Nominee Refuses to Withdraw Despite Felony Charge - ABC News

Liberals are thrilled to have Alvin Greene on board for other reasons like his being forced out of the U.S. Army last year.

Let's hear it for the liberals and their party of tolerance! :)
 
How disappointing you would post this, get a life, this is for people who use droids, and need help using these devices.. please go some place else to do your soapbox thing. Attention Administrator !
 
How disappointing you would post this, get a life, this is for people who use droids, and need help using these devices.. please go some place else to do your soapbox thing. Attention Administrator !

WRONG! This is the the lounge>Politica and current affairs forum. NO phone help here! If you dont like reading about politics, I would stay away from this part.
 
Are you claiming this didn't happen? Click the link for ABC News that I posted. Sorry, I couldn't find the kiddie site for you, so just deal.

No, I know it happened. But it is an obvious "put-up" job. The guy is a plant. The Repubs have done that previously in South Carolina.

You fell for it.
 
No, I know it happened. But it is an obvious "put-up" job. The guy is a plant. The Repubs have done that previously in South Carolina.

You fell for it.
Post your proof this guy is a plant. Or are you just blowing more smoke out of your arse? Face it, the guy is for real and you liberals flocked to him like moths to a flame. No one has ever accused liberals of being very bright! ;)

Greene says he isn't going to drop out either. I hope he doesn't, this is the kind of candidate that is true to those liberal, tolerant values of your party. He did get over 75% of the vote!
 
Liberals are proud to have Greene represent them, complete with his pending felony charges for "disseminating, procuring or promoting obscenity" in Richland County, S.C.

Liberals are thrilled to have Alvin Greene on board for other reasons like his being forced out of the U.S. Army last year.

LMAO!!! Your rhetoric is ridiculous! How can you say that they are "proud" or "thrilled" to have him when he has been asked by top members in the party to withdraw.

In truth nobody even knows who this person is. He doesn't even seem to know himself lol. There is definatly something strange going on with this.

YouTube - Keith Olbermann Interviews Alvin Greene - 06/10/10
 
Post your proof this guy is a plant. Or are you just blowing more smoke out of your arse? Face it, the guy is for real and you liberals flocked to him like moths to a flame. No one has ever accused liberals of being very bright! ;)


Perhaps you should run for office in south carolina.
 
LMAO!!! Your rhetoric is ridiculous! How can you say that they are "proud" or "thrilled" to have him when he has been asked by top members in the party to withdraw.

In truth nobody even knows who this person is. He doesn't even seem to know himself lol. There is definatly something strange going on with this.
He got more than 75% of the vote. Now that is pride in your candidate! Liberals spout off the number of votes for Oilbama like that proves something, so same thing here. Or are liberals becoming even more hypocritical? (as if that were possible)

Perhaps you should run for office in south carolina.
And destroy your dream? I'm not cruel like that. Plus I don't have any criminal record or felony charges...means I'm ineligible! You should be fine, though.
 
He got more than 75% of the vote. Now that is pride in your candidate! Liberals spout off the number of votes for Oilbama like that proves something, so same thing here. Or are liberals becoming even more hypocritical? (as if that were possible)

I don't know what you are reading (shutter) but he didn't get 75% of the vote, he got 60%. But yea, keep it up with the arguments that are not based in fact. Any reasonable person can recognize that something strange is going on.
 
I don't know what you are reading (shutter) but he didn't get 75% of the vote, he got 60%.
Must be time for your own *Whoopsie daisy!* moment:

Greene also racked up a 75 percent or greater margin in one-seventh of all precincts statewide, a mark that Ludwig notes is even difficult for an incumbent to reach.

And it's spelled "shudder."
But yea, keep it up with the arguments that are not based in fact.
See above! *ouch!*
nydxcw.jpg


Any reasonable person can recognize that something strange is going on.
He's your candidate. Don't you support him? Is it because Greene is black? Because he is unemployed? Because he lives with his parents? Because he was drummed out of the Army? Because he has felony sex charges pending?

Where is your tolerance? Stop the insanity!
 
Must be time for your own *Whoopsie daisy!* moment:

Yea I suck at spelling, always have. Meh

Also, you JUST posted.... he got 75% or more in one seventh of the precincts, that does not equal 75% of the total vote. From your own article:

"...managed to handily defeat Rawl 59 percent to 41 percent."


Also, hes not my candidate. You don't know me or most of my political positions.
 
Yea I suck at spelling, always have. Meh

Also, you JUST posted.... he got 75% or more in one seventh of the precincts, that does not equal 75% of the total vote. From your own article:

"...managed to handily defeat Rawl 59 percent to 41 percent."
Where did I say 75% of the total vote? I didn't. You have a nasty habit of trying to push your incorrect assumptions onto me. Never works for you or hakr100 though.

And his 75%....I'm praising the best part of what this tremendous face of the liberals achieved, and you want to take that away from him! Is it because Greene is black? Because he is unemployed? Because he lives with his parents? Because he was drummed out of the Army? Because he has felony sex charges pending?

Also, hes not my candidate. You don't know me or most of my political positions.
Your posts certainly lean very liberal, making Alvin Greene your candidate you can be proud of! *high five*
 
Where did I say 75% of the total vote? I didn't. You have a nasty habit of trying to push your incorrect assumptions onto me. Never works for you or hakr100 though.

And his 75%....I'm praising the best part of what this tremendous face of the liberals achieved, and you want to take that away from him! Is it because Greene is black? Because he is unemployed? Because he lives with his parents? Because he was drummed out of the Army? Because he has felony sex charges pending?

Your posts certainly lean very liberal, making Alvin Greene your candidate you can be proud of! *high five*

ROFL you are hilarious! Seriously!!!

He got more than 75% of the vote. Now that is pride in your candidate...

So I'm supposed to interpret that as "in one seventh of the precincts"? Is that really your argument? Hilarious.

In many of the topic that I have been discussing I have taken the "liberal" point of view, but there are more than enough issues were I take the conservative point of view. Anyway I don't really feel the need to defend myself from your assumptions anymore, they are just silly.
 
hmm...altering or leaving out facts in order to achieve something or make other people believe something that may not be true. sounds awfully familiar...
 
So I'm supposed to interpret that as "in one seventh of the precincts"? Is that really your argument? Hilarious.
My statement was factual, you can interpret it any way you want to. :)

Why don't you answer my questions as to why you seem reluctant to endorse Alvin Greene? Are you a racist?

In many of the topic that I have been discussing I have taken the "liberal" point of view, but there are more than enough issues were I take the conservative point of view. Anyway I don't really feel the need to defend myself from your assumptions anymore, they are just silly.
So why aren't you celebrating the esteemed choice of liberals in Alvin Greene? Aren't you proud this man is the new face of your party? Where is that tolerance we hear so much of but don't see?
 
Alvin Greene won the Democratic primary in SC and now the Democratic Party Executive Committee, in a rare bow to democracy and a fair election, has decided not to void the election results. What is still bothersome is the dems actually considered and debated it to begin with. There is much evidence that liberals hate America and our freedoms, and voiding the election results would have been more proof. Somehow they figured that out, probably not on their own.

Still, the dems are considering putting their support behind an independent candidate, probably lesbian Democrat Linda Ketner. Why do liberals hate Alvin Greene and display such hostility towards him? They have questioned his mental capacity and tried to discredit him.

Democrat Rep. Jim Clyburn, a proven liar, still blames Republicans!
 
Fenga, Fenga why don't you stick your Fenga where the sun don't shine. I am from South Carolina and the Democratic party here essentially doesn't exist. This guy was given the money by republican operatives to run and there will be an investigation. More republican dirty tricks. The party of dirty tricks.
 
Oh, and Fenga, your republican party is the same party that elected Jakie Knotts a senator in South Carolina, who said with reference to Nicky Haley, raised by Indian Sikhs and who won the majority of the votes in the republican primary, that, "We have a rag head in the White House. We don't need one in the State House", but it looks like she will be the Governor of South Carolina.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom