radiotecha1234
Newbie
Just got a text message from VM. If you upgrade now to a new 2012 phone your monthly goes to $35 minimum. I was a holdout on their $25 plan and was going to upgrade. Now it looks like I am going to T-Mobile.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
VMFreeMsg Starting 5/27/12, new smartphones will be subject to current plan rates. This will apply if you switch phones. Go to http://msg4u.us/src for info
Here's what I posted in the VM forum:
Overall, I really don't have a problem with this. If you knew me, you'd know that I have RAILED against the carriers, but that's the contract carriers. Overall, the pre-paids play a lot more fair and Virgin Mobile USA has been more than fair here. If you think about it, this is pre-paid. We're not signing a contract and that means we don't get the consumer side contract benefits either. VM was under no obligation to let us keep our $25 dollar plans. Even now, they aren't forcing you into a new plan unless you go beyond their current offering. I don't think that's a bad deal.
Also, keep in mind that this likely means that there won't be any additional fees or rate increases for WiMax on the Evo V when it hits. I can't see them pulling multiple moves like this back to back. They are competing with T-Mobile and Straight Talk hard core right now.
Actually VM was obligated to let you keep the $25 plan under the grandfather clause.
Another thing the MT is a 2011 phone and always will be no matter what year it is. The price increase actually makes sense if VM is getting WiMAX and the One V/ Evo 3D.
My point has nothing to do with fairness. It is just a simple matter of pricing and quality. Why would I pay $35 for 4G when I can go elsewhere and pay $30.
FYI, I merged both threads discussing this, so if things look a little out of order or confusing that is why (merged posts go in chronological order ). Carry on.
Can you explain to me how that legal precedence applies in this situation?
yea with vm doing this that means a big phone better than the triumph will be hitting soon.
I thinking either the evo v or the htc one v. the other 2 phones that were talked about wouldn't force triumph users to switch. and just read that virgin mobile canada should be getting the htc one s soon with a price tag of about 600. and vm usa should be getting one v soon hopefully with a price tag no where near one s
Just read the one v is going to be available around may 3rd to vm canada for a little under 300. so the same price range is to be expected for usa more than likely.
But switching from the triumph to one v then going to 35 a month for probably same shit with 3g internet might aswell go to tmobile for 30 fro 4g.
I don't think I would even switch from a Triumph to the HTC One V. Both have 1 GHz processors and 512 MB RAM, and the Triumph has the screen size advantage (4.1 vs 3.7).
I don't think I would even switch from a Triumph to the HTC One V. Both have 1 GHz processors and 512 MB RAM, and the Triumph has the screen size advantage (4.1 vs 3.7).
Here's what I posted in the VM forum:
Overall, I really don't have a problem with this. If you knew me, you'd know that I have RAILED against the carriers, but that's the contract carriers. Overall, the pre-paids play a lot more fair and Virgin Mobile USA has been more than fair here. If you think about it, this is pre-paid. We're not signing a contract and that means we don't get the consumer side contract benefits either. VM was under no obligation to let us keep our $25 dollar plans. Even now, they aren't forcing you into a new plan unless you go beyond their current offering. I don't think that's a bad deal.
Also, keep in mind that this likely means that there won't be any additional fees or rate increases for WiMax on the Evo V when it hits. I can't see them pulling multiple moves like this back to back. They are competing with T-Mobile and Straight Talk hard core right now.
Overall, I really don't have a problem with this. If you knew me, you'd know that I have RAILED against the carriers, but that's the contract carriers. Overall, the pre-paids play a lot more fair and Virgin Mobile USA has been more than fair here. If you think about it, this is pre-paid. We're not signing a contract and that means we don't get the consumer side contract benefits either. VM was under no obligation to let us keep our $25 dollar plans. Even now, they aren't forcing you into a new plan unless you go beyond their current offering. I don't think that's a bad deal.
Also, keep in mind that this likely means that there won't be any additional fees or rate increases for WiMax on the Evo V when it hits. I can't see them pulling multiple moves like this back to back. They are competing with T-Mobile and Straight Talk hard core right now.