Back in the day [when I was staff], we tossed around thoughts on old threads and the wisdom, or lack thereof, of leaving them open for new activity. I thought they should be closed.
My reason then was the same as now: new members reply to a 7-year-old thread, thinking they're offering helpful info, until someone comes along and tells them it's from 7 years ago. Or 4 or 9; you get the idea.
When I'm the someone who enlightens the newbie, I try to be polite and 'ha ha, it's okay!' upbeat. But why don't we just lock threads that are >X years old AND have had no activity for Y years? Or some other criteria.
Even if someone thinks they have the same problem as the OP, the truth is...probably not. They're 5 Android versions newer on 8 year newer hardware. What are the odds it's exactly the same issue, with the same solution [if there was one]?
Thoughts?
My reason then was the same as now: new members reply to a 7-year-old thread, thinking they're offering helpful info, until someone comes along and tells them it's from 7 years ago. Or 4 or 9; you get the idea.
When I'm the someone who enlightens the newbie, I try to be polite and 'ha ha, it's okay!' upbeat. But why don't we just lock threads that are >X years old AND have had no activity for Y years? Or some other criteria.
Even if someone thinks they have the same problem as the OP, the truth is...probably not. They're 5 Android versions newer on 8 year newer hardware. What are the odds it's exactly the same issue, with the same solution [if there was one]?
Thoughts?