Just curious what peoples thought are on this.
Take ANY phone, with a case and without a case.
Scenario is dropping the phone. What percentage of non-breakage or not breaking the phone with a case on, as apposed to a case NOT on the phone do you think it is. I know it increases the chances of you saving the phone vs the breaking the phone.
I was just curious as to what percentage you gain to save the phone from damage with a case, as apposed to damaging the phone, not having a case on it.
I've seen Iphone5 vs Samsung S3 drop tests, and it seems as though the Iphone5 faired pretty good vs the Samsung which got a cracked screen 2 times in the test I saw. I understand that the test I saw wasn't really a "true" real word situation, and also that the Samsung S3 has more real-estate area, so it's going to be a given really that the Samsung has a higher chance of being broken. But if the Samsung say had a case on it, how much would that increase the chance of it NOT getting damaged, or broken?
Take ANY phone, with a case and without a case.
Scenario is dropping the phone. What percentage of non-breakage or not breaking the phone with a case on, as apposed to a case NOT on the phone do you think it is. I know it increases the chances of you saving the phone vs the breaking the phone.
I was just curious as to what percentage you gain to save the phone from damage with a case, as apposed to damaging the phone, not having a case on it.
I've seen Iphone5 vs Samsung S3 drop tests, and it seems as though the Iphone5 faired pretty good vs the Samsung which got a cracked screen 2 times in the test I saw. I understand that the test I saw wasn't really a "true" real word situation, and also that the Samsung S3 has more real-estate area, so it's going to be a given really that the Samsung has a higher chance of being broken. But if the Samsung say had a case on it, how much would that increase the chance of it NOT getting damaged, or broken?


