• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Report: Body scanner makers doubled lobbying cash over 5 years...

X10iUser

X10iUser

Android Expert
Multimillion dollar government contracts don't just happen. Ask the companies with the big government contracts to supply Body-scanning machines to U.S. airports how much more they had to spend on lobbying on the Hill. Not only have they increased their lobbying efforts over the last 5 years, they're doing it with some very familiar names.

USA Today reports that the companies with the biggest government contracts for body-scanners doubled their lobbying cash over the last five years, and advanced their agenda with lobbyists Linda Daschle, a former FAA official and wife of former Senate majority leader Tom Daschle, and former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff.

L-3 Communications, and lobbyist Linda Daschle, "reported lobbying on nearly two dozen bills, ranging from homeland security appropriations to military construction. Among the bills targeted by L-3 lobbyists: legislation proposed by Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, that would limit the use of the scanners at airports as a backup measure only."

After passing in the House in 2009, Chaffetz's legislation languished in the Senate after an alleged failed attempt to ignite an explosive powder during a Christmas-time flight to Detroit.

Chaffetz acknowledges that the attempted bombing contributed to the bill's failure, but added "But I also routinely heard that 'Secretary Chertoff believes this is the right thing to do. Who are you to challenge him?' "

Also amid the tensions over the invasive body scanners, and the TSA 'pat-downs,' Transportation Security Administration chief John Pistole warned against boycotting the airport scans. Citing holiday travelers being delayed by protests during such busy, stressful air travel days, and reminding us of bombers past he pleaded for understanding.

A report adds that despite internet rumors of protest, "There was little if any indication of a passenger revolt Monday at many major U.S. airports, with very few people declining the X-ray scan that can peer through their clothes. Those who refuse are subject to a pat-down search that includes the crotch and chest."

"Many travelers said that the scans and the pat-down were not much of an inconvenience, and that the stepped-up measures made them feel safer and were, in any case, unavoidable."

The latest poll of Americans regarding the body-scanners shows that nearly two-thirds of Americans support the new, full-body screening machines, with most adding that they place a "higher priority on combating terrorism than protecting personal privacy, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll."

However, half of all of those polled agreed that those TSA pat-down searches are going just too far.
Click to expand...
SOURCE

Can't really say I'm surprised to read this.
 
So.... what exactly does L-3's lobbying (and the examples specifically called out) have to do with full body scanners? They're a minor part of L-3's business, at most.
 
bleh. new slogans for the TSA(taken from another forum i visit):

Can't see London can't see France unless we see your underpants.

Grope discounts available.

If we did our job any better we'd have to buy you dinner first.

Only we know if Lady Gaga is really a lady.

Don't worry, my hands are still warm from the last guy.

Wanna fly? Drop your fly.

We are now free to move about your pants.

We rub you the wrong way, so you can be on your way.

It's not a grope it's a freedom pat.

You were a virgin.

We handle more packages than the UPS.
 
ahhhhhh can you FEEL the FREEEDOM

but I bet you FEEL more safe right.

I will send some ideas to the TSA and Homeland security such as,
I think you are doing a great job. You really make me feel safer to fly. I want to thank you for your hard work. Will you please consider making it mandatory for everyone flying to wear a spandex t-shirt and spandex shorts along with crocs. I think this will make your jobs much easier to catch those bad terrorist people and will also make me fly more because I would feel safer.

Think my idea would fly:D

* I will open spandex stores within each airport.

Then after that implementation I will say great job again.... but can you mandate that everyone wear a clear/opaque poncho only to better help you find the bad items.

* Then I will change my spandex store over to selling opaque ponchos

Do you not see how you are becoming prisoners of your own country? Each year a NEW LAW is passed to keep you safe but each year you LOSE MORE FREEDOM...hmmm
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom