Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
. the part you left out in your quote above is the portion in the bill where people can only be questions about their immigration status if they have been detained for committing a crime.
news flash, its been ruled time and time again by the Supreme Court that local police have the authority to question suspects that have been detained for crimes about their immigration status.
And directly from line 24 of the law, then repeated on line 28:
"The attorney general or county attorney shall not investigate complaints that are based solely on race, color, or national origin."
www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf
lol I dont know what benefit they would get out of it honestly...
I'm still against the law they passed and I still think the best thing to do is get a big wall built.
That is regarding employing unauthorized aliens. A person can file a complaint about a company using illegals but the attorney general will not investigate the complaint if it is "based solely on race, color, or national origin"
No, it doesn't say that as "that's all." It doesn't say what the OP claimed either. Please post the exact content of SB 1070 you have issues with, along with the date of the bill to ensure it is the amended version.1070 says a LEO can inquire about a person's immigration status if "reasonable suspicion exists"...thats all. I think people are afraid LEOs' definitions of "reasonable suspicion" will be WAAAAAAYY broad leading to ethnic discrimination.
Sounds like you see what you want to see. That explains a lot.What I see with the Arizona law is a lot of profiling being done by those who want to run up numbers.
Arizona can not secede. This is after all the UNITED states of America. I do however wish they would be the first to try the resulting war would set the progressive movement back 100 years aside from killing off the drug smugglers.
Wow, I did not realize it was that bad in Arizona...
I think that the facts may be a bit over dramatic though. Granted there is a huge problem with illegal immigration but if there were no jobs for the illegals frankly there would be no reason for them to move here. Playing devils advocate, there are many tax paying, law abiding (albeit except for immigration status) illegal immigrants in all boarder states. It certainly does not help when every dozen or so years we grant amnesty or extend the previous amnesty program(s).
The drug issue in combination with the human smugglers (coyotes) are the crux of our problems, law enforcement and social services are overburdened and tax payers/legal citizens are tired of footing the bill. While I do not particularly think that the law was a smart idea as we will be incurring giant legal expenses, frankly something needs to be done.
Funny thought to secede from the Union, not surprising from a Texan - would you join us?
There are no jobs in Arizona, which is why now the illegals are focused on drug trafficking and mob rule of the border more than the "American Dream".
It would be interesting to learn what the approximate percentage of illegals is Arizona is, and what percentage of those are engaged in serious criminal activities.
and hackr, it isnt the job of the american people or the people of arizona to create jobs for illegals/criminals, we should be creating jobs for citizens and people that are in this country legally.
Everyone, please note the real "tolerance" of liberals. Their party of Hate & Hypocrisy™ rears it's ugly head once again.Well, sure...you wouldn't expect a conservative governor and conservative voters to look inward and do whatever they could do to improve economic conditions in their state...it's far easier to find scapegoats.
Wow, I did not realize it was that bad in Arizona...
I think that the facts may be a bit over dramatic though. Granted there is a huge problem with illegal immigration but if there were no jobs for the illegals frankly there would be no reason for them to move here. Playing devils advocate, there are many tax paying, law abiding (albeit except for immigration status) illegal immigrants in all boarder states. It certainly does not help when every dozen or so years we grant amnesty or extend the previous amnesty program(s).
The drug issue in combination with the human smugglers (coyotes) are the crux of our problems, law enforcement and social services are overburdened and tax payers/legal citizens are tired of footing the bill. While I do not particularly think that the law was a smart idea as we will be incurring giant legal expenses, frankly something needs to be done.
Funny thought to secede from the Union, not surprising from a Texan - would you join us?
The feds do nothing, and our police are powerless to do anything until something violent happens.
What do Arizona police do when they pick up someone for a violation and that someone cannot produce any sort of valid paperwork?
What SB1070 does is allow the police to prosecute them being here as a state violation. You're here illegally in the US and in AZ, well, thats now a state crime so we will hold you and prosecute you for violating state laws unless the Feds would like to step in and prosecute you under Federal Law.
Well, no wonder the feds are pursuing this in court. That seems an obvious violation of the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2:
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
and the part of the 14th Amendment that says:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States."
It seems to me that if Arizona were not satisfied with the way the federal government were enforcing a law, it could initiate a lawsuit in U.S. District Court. Being in the U.S.A. illegally is a federal crime, not a state crime.
My guess is that Arizona's new law will be declared unConstitutional if it is as you describe, because the state of Arizona is stepping on the U.S.A.'s cape.
Well, no wonder the feds are pursuing this in court. That seems an obvious violation of the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2:
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."