• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

The Innocence of Muslims video

Like the US's 2nd amendment? The reason our founding fathers left that in there is in case the government got too out of hand. They definitely want that one removed.

Exactly why there are so many restrictions and laws governing that right. Just keep tightening those and eventually you successfully eradicate the 2nd amendment. Then who cares about the 1st amendment or any of the rest for that matter because the government no longer fears the people.
 
No, but I've read up on people wanting the producer charged.
'Innocence of Muslims' doesn't meet free-speech test - latimes.com

Yes, there are those that are exercising their Freedom of Speech, but offensive even deceptive speech is protected. Doesn't mean offensive or deceptive speech can't be criticized.

The premise of Freedom of Speech is based on the means has not been concentrated into the hands of a few. With Google and the internet, this concentration is less than in the past.
 
The title of this thread is "The Innocence of Muslims video". Muslims can be defined as people.

A poster has claimed People are stupid, a derogatory term. History has shown that once a group can be defined in derogatory terms, then extreme harm to said group can be rationalized.

Semantics is important.

I don't think OstrichSak or anyone else is advocating the genocide of the entire human race or anything close to it. For the record, people are stupid.
 
Like? Apparently you have been blind to the laws they've been passing for the past couple of decades. They're not even doing it behind closed doors anymore since most citizens pay no attention.

BTW, I think the fact that Judge Napolitano and other news analysts being investigated by the DoJ for Sedition is a bigger threat to our 1st Amendment right than this stupid video.

Well, yeah, I've only noticed it the past 10 years.

And I can't find much about the judge
 
Like the US's 2nd amendment? The reason our founding fathers left that in there is in case the government got too out of hand. They definitely want that one removed.

Here are three threads this year related to 2nd Amendment. Feel free to comment.

http://androidforums.com/politics-c...ight-bear-arms-vs-right-fire.html#post4081363

http://androidforums.com/politics-c...nd-amendment-enemies-freedom.html#post4022713

http://androidforums.com/politics-current-affairs/447523-2nd-amendment.html#post3485386
 
It appears no movie was made, just a clip. Perhaps an attempt at propaganda ?

California judge rules anti-Islam film can stay on YouTube | Reuters

U.S. officials have said authorities are not investigating the film project itself and that even if it was inflammatory or led to violence, simply producing it cannot be considered a crime in the United States due to the nation's strong free speech laws.

But Nakoula, a Coptic Christian California man who pleaded guilty to bank fraud in 2010, was interviewed by federal probation officers on Saturday probing whether he violated the terms of his release while making the film.

Nakoula, who was released from prison in 2011, is prohibited from accessing the Web or assuming aliases without the approval of his probation officer, court records show. Violations could result in him being sent back to prison.

Nakoula, 55, did not return to his house in the Los Angeles suburb of Cerritos following his interview, and his whereabouts are unknown. Last week, he denied involvement in the film in a phone call to his Coptic bishop in Los Angeles.

Garcia, asked if a longer version of the film exists, told reporters outside court before the hearing that she did not believe the movie was ever finished.

"There is no entire movie, there's only that clip," she said.
 
Well all the trash talking about Muslims and Mohammed was dubbed after filming.
The actors all thought they were making a film about ancient Egypt.
 
is anything in the film/trailer (because thats all it really is) inaccurate or unfactual?

my understanding is they are just mad because they dont want everyone to know the truth about what kind of person their 'messiah' really was
 
is anything in the film/trailer (because thats all it really is) inaccurate or unfactual?

my understanding is they are just mad because they dont want everyone to know the truth about what kind of person their 'messiah' really was

That he was a smart albeit delusional guy who was used to further the goals of an elite? Sounds like Jesus.
And at least Muslims don't have the audacity to claim Muhammad or Jesus are the sons of god.
 
I dunno.... they did have the audacity to dance and parade in the streets on September 11, 2001. I know not every Muslim was happy or cheering about 2,000+ innocent civilians dying that day, but I didn't see any other ethnic group happy about it.

Edit: I'm not some super (fake) patriotic American. I mean, there was cause and effect that led up to America getting attacked.
It's just you don't see that kind of response from any other group of people. Burn a bible - 0 deaths. Burn a quran - jihad against the western world.
 
That he was a smart albeit delusional guy who was used to further the goals of an elite? Sounds like Jesus.
And at least Muslims don't have the audacity to claim Muhammad or Jesus are the sons of god.

admittedly I dont know a whole lot about the religion... and I certainly havent seen the 'trailer'

but again my understanding is that it highlights some of the facts as taken directly from the koran as well as history..... as I recall wasnt there something said about him beating his 6 YEAR OLD wife for something

perhaps thats what they are embarrassed about?

I have to believe its that they dont want to be reminded of the truth about their 'messiah' or want anyone else to learn of it for that matter
 
Not sure where you learned your English Vocabulary but this is inaccurate. People is the pluralization of person. It is grammatically impossible for me to be people. A person can be smart. People are stupid.

Perhaps "some people are stupid" is a tad more accurate?

I agree . . . some people are stupid. I have done certain things often characterized as "stupid." I am a person and part of the people. But I not be stoopid.

stu
 
Back
Top Bottom