Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm actually somewhat looking forward to tiered data. I sick of paying the same as some guy using 5gb, when I'm only using 2-3.
For once users might actually get what they pay for, literally.
Not trying to start a war. but you bought your smartphone to use it like a feature phone? And a laptop when your home?but no one is forcing you to watch you tube in hd while on your cell coverage. i for one am in favor of tiered plans for the same reason as spoken above. i dont stream music when out and about, i dont download a lot of videos or visit full websites until i am home on my wifi network.
they dont force you buy unlimited minutes do they?
Not trying to start a war. but you bought your smartphone to use it like a feature phone? And a laptop when your home?
Doesn't make much sense so you save 5 or 10 bucks a month for dumbing down your phone. Like the internet is something that runs out. I guess by your logic I should call my internet provider at my house and ask them make it cheaper because I don't do p2p and hog bandwidth.
No matter what the argument is I heard that $30 a month will be the minimum payment which would mean that all that is happening is us losing data. It doesn't matter whether you use it or not why would you want something you are already paying for to just be reduced?
Uh, no way the minimum will be $30. I understand that Verizon's purpose in doing this isn't to be gracious, but they still have to be competitive in the market. Otherwise, the switch will be pointless.No matter what the argument is I heard that $30 a month will be the minimum payment which would mean that all that is happening is us losing data. It doesn't matter whether you use it or not why would you want something you are already paying for to just be reduced?
Just to clarify, they can not change this on a phone under contract.can they.
Idk if you would be happy with a tiered data plan. AT&T's tiered data plan is $15 for 200mb, and 20$ for 2gb. There is no plan for more than 2gb. They probably charge ridiculous amounts for each mb after that.I'm actually somewhat looking forward to tiered data. I sick of paying the same as some guy using 5gb, when I'm only using 2-3.
For once users might actually get what they pay for, literally.
Idk if you would be happy with a tiered data plan. AT&T's tiered data plan is $15 for 200mb, and 20$ for 2gb. There is no plan for more than 2gb. They probably charge ridiculous amounts for each mb after that.
Would anyone here consider switching to Sprint if tiered data plans were make their way over to Verizon?
Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
The same thing was said when Verizon forced data onto 3G "multimedia" phones. They still experienced positive growth whereas Sprint still lost subs.absolutely. Verizon may provide a better signal, but if they're gonna charge out the @$$ for it, then they're gonna lose a lot of customers.
I'll bet Dan Hesse is sitting in his office smiling right now.
The same thing was said when Verizon forced data onto 3G "multimedia" phones. They still experienced positive growth whereas Sprint still lost subs.
Also, tiered data isn't necessarily synonymous with expensive or overpriced. For example, if Verizon prices data packages on par with AT&T, the overwhelming majority of subs would see a reduction in their montly bill.
No, this is untrue. As technology moves forward, we are using more and more data, sometimes unknowingly.
Advertisements in apps? - Data.
Gtalk? -Data
Market? -Data
YouTube? -A Handful of these a week can set you over your limit by itself.
Pandora? - See the youtube reference.
Background Sync? - Data
Browsing the web? -Data
Email Sync? - Data
New/Faster/Better capabilities are coming, with faster than ever speeds that make loads of stuff we never thought of doing possible with our mobile devices. Imagine if Comcast/ATT/Roadrunner etc put small arbitrary bandwidth caps on home service. Imagine what wouldn't exist, like online gaming, video streaming from youtube/hulu etc, pandora, all these services wouldn't exist, or would be very poor at best, because no one would be able to afford it. The list goes on and on. ATT and VZW are taking a step backwards here, and I'm glad to see Sprint and T-Mobile publicly come against bandwidth caps.
-Another thing, bandwidth caps don't even make sense.
If you bought a smartphone to use it as a smartphone, then bandwidth caps are not for you. People need to look towards tomorrow, and the next day, instead of yesterday. That is what got ATT in trouble with their crappy ass network, and why they are facing so much flak from the media and people about their 2-bit crap network. It's a crying shame they were #1 subscribed to for YEARS, and yet are 3rd out of 4 carriers when it comes to their 3G network. That's what happens when you don't look to the future.
The last thing I want, is "Oh crap, I can't watch this youtube video my co-worker sent me until I get home, because I'm close to my ridiculously small bandwidth limit. " Especially with the premium VZW charges, you guys should be outraged.
If you really think this is going to somehow save you money, your wrong. One overage, *just one*, can equal the cost savings for your entire two year contract or more. I don't want to have to worry about data caps when I'm using an already pricey internet plan when compared to what people pay for landline service.
No, this is untrue. As technology moves forward, we are using more and more data, sometimes unknowingly.
Advertisements in apps? - Data.
Gtalk? -Data
Market? -Data
YouTube? -A Handful of these a week can set you over your limit by itself.
Pandora? - See the youtube reference.
Background Sync? - Data
Browsing the web? -Data
Email Sync? - Data
New/Faster/Better capabilities are coming, with faster than ever speeds that make loads of stuff we never thought of doing possible with our mobile devices. Imagine if Comcast/ATT/Roadrunner etc put small arbitrary bandwidth caps on home service. Imagine what wouldn't exist, like online gaming, video streaming from youtube/hulu etc, pandora, all these services wouldn't exist, or would be very poor at best, because no one would be able to afford it. The list goes on and on. ATT and VZW are taking a step backwards here, and I'm glad to see Sprint and T-Mobile publicly come against bandwidth caps.
-Another thing, bandwidth caps don't even make sense.
If you bought a smartphone to use it as a smartphone, then bandwidth caps are not for you. People need to look towards tomorrow, and the next day, instead of yesterday. That is what got ATT in trouble with their crappy ass network, and why they are facing so much flak from the media and people about their 2-bit crap network. It's a crying shame they were #1 subscribed to for YEARS, and yet are 3rd out of 4 carriers when it comes to their 3G network. That's what happens when you don't look to the future.
The last thing I want, is "Oh crap, I can't watch this youtube video my co-worker sent me until I get home, because I'm close to my ridiculously small bandwidth limit. " Especially with the premium VZW charges, you guys should be outraged.
If you really think this is going to somehow save you money, your wrong. One overage, *just one*, can equal the cost savings for your entire two year contract or more. I don't want to have to worry about data caps when I'm using an already pricey internet plan when compared to what people pay for landline service.