Old Man
Android Enthusiast
What is ironic is that you have people offering arguments like this against anything but unlimited data plans while at the same time you have others arguing against being required to have any data plan because they claim that they always use Wi-Fi. Both sides have valid points and yet they directly conflict with one another. So what about tiered plans that include an unlimited tier? Might that offer a solution that actually tries to address both ends as well as those in the middle? How do you know that is not what may be offered? For all we know Verizon could keep the current unlimited plan and rate and simply add one or two lower capacity, lower cost data plan tiers and all this could be a lot of worrying about something that turns out for the better. Okay, unlikely to turn out exactly that way, but the point is that we don't actually know what any tiered data plans might mean, but we apparently need something to worry about (me included).No, this is untrue. As technology moves forward, we are using more and more data, sometimes unknowingly.
Advertisements in apps? - Data.
Gtalk? -Data
Market? -Data
YouTube? -A Handful of these a week can set you over your limit by itself.
Pandora? - See the youtube reference.
Background Sync? - Data
Browsing the web? -Data
Email Sync? - Data
New/Faster/Better capabilities are coming, with faster than ever speeds that make loads of stuff we never thought of doing possible with our mobile devices. Imagine if Comcast/ATT/Roadrunner etc put small arbitrary bandwidth caps on home service. Imagine what wouldn't exist, like online gaming, video streaming from youtube/hulu etc, pandora, all these services wouldn't exist, or would be very poor at best, because no one would be able to afford it. The list goes on and on. ATT and VZW are taking a step backwards here, and I'm glad to see Sprint and T-Mobile publicly come against bandwidth caps.
-Another thing, bandwidth caps don't even make sense.
If you bought a smartphone to use it as a smartphone, then bandwidth caps are not for you. People need to look towards tomorrow, and the next day, instead of yesterday. That is what got ATT in trouble with their crappy ass network, and why they are facing so much flak from the media and people about their 2-bit crap network. It's a crying shame they were #1 subscribed to for YEARS, and yet are 3rd out of 4 carriers when it comes to their 3G network. That's what happens when you don't look to the future.
The last thing I want, is "Oh crap, I can't watch this youtube video my co-worker sent me until I get home, because I'm close to my ridiculously small bandwidth limit. " Especially with the premium VZW charges, you guys should be outraged.
If you really think this is going to somehow save you money, your wrong. One overage, *just one*, can equal the cost savings for your entire two year contract or more. I don't want to have to worry about data caps when I'm using an already pricey internet plan when compared to what people pay for landline service.
And while it could happen, a single overage at $0.05 to $0.20 per MB would have to be pretty extreme to offset all the potential savings. And that's if overages are addressed in that manner and not via a simple lump sum or by bumping you up to the next tier. Without knowing the tier rates and overage rates it's impossible to really know what actually might occur.