electricpete
Android Expert
It seems that most photo's of people wearing various A.W. watches... the watch looks oversized for the wrist.
Zenwatch photo
Moto 360 photo
LG G Watch photo
LG G Watch R photo
Sony Smartwatch 3 photo
Samsung Gear Live photo
This imore article bemoans the fact that Android Wear watches don't seem made for women. It has some good photo's to illustrate the point with both traditional "top view" and "end view". Often the watch looks tolerable in the top view but ridiculous in the endview.
I'm no woman, but I think my wrists are average (or slightly below?) at 7.25 inches / 18.4 cm around the perimeter. I measured that by measuring my traditional watch/strap at appropriate positions, also by using a shoelace just snug/not-taught around wrist at thinnest point and then measuring the shoelace with a ruler.)
I don't want to buy a watch that looks silly because it's an oversized hunk of technology sitting on my wrist....I want it to look like it fits.
If I could try them on, I could evaluate that better. But the only one I've actually been able to try on my wrist is the Moto 360 at Best Buy. That seemed slightly oversized but it was small enough to be tolerable to me. (I'd pull the trigger and buy it, but I've heard horrible things about the battery life). I think the LG G watch R with that huge bezel will end up looking more oversized than the Moto 360 did.... not sure if that would be tolerable to me.
What do you folks think? Which budget watches don't look oversized on your wrist? (I'm looking in the range roughly $200 and below... I know there are some newly-introduced watches with smaller wrist-prints but they seem to be all $300+).
Typical response I imagine might be "My wrists are average and LG G Watch R looks fine".
I'd certainly appreciate that type of input...
.... but if anyone can provide wrist measurements and photos similar to those in the imore article, that'd be even better!
Zenwatch photo
Moto 360 photo
LG G Watch photo
LG G Watch R photo
Sony Smartwatch 3 photo
Samsung Gear Live photo
This imore article bemoans the fact that Android Wear watches don't seem made for women. It has some good photo's to illustrate the point with both traditional "top view" and "end view". Often the watch looks tolerable in the top view but ridiculous in the endview.
I'm no woman, but I think my wrists are average (or slightly below?) at 7.25 inches / 18.4 cm around the perimeter. I measured that by measuring my traditional watch/strap at appropriate positions, also by using a shoelace just snug/not-taught around wrist at thinnest point and then measuring the shoelace with a ruler.)
I don't want to buy a watch that looks silly because it's an oversized hunk of technology sitting on my wrist....I want it to look like it fits.
If I could try them on, I could evaluate that better. But the only one I've actually been able to try on my wrist is the Moto 360 at Best Buy. That seemed slightly oversized but it was small enough to be tolerable to me. (I'd pull the trigger and buy it, but I've heard horrible things about the battery life). I think the LG G watch R with that huge bezel will end up looking more oversized than the Moto 360 did.... not sure if that would be tolerable to me.
What do you folks think? Which budget watches don't look oversized on your wrist? (I'm looking in the range roughly $200 and below... I know there are some newly-introduced watches with smaller wrist-prints but they seem to be all $300+).
Typical response I imagine might be "My wrists are average and LG G Watch R looks fine".
I'd certainly appreciate that type of input...
.... but if anyone can provide wrist measurements and photos similar to those in the imore article, that'd be even better!
Last edited: