Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I will get a gun when I turn 21 (I'm 19 now) A shotgun for the house and a Pistol for me. Is not a good feeling to know you can;t go outside without having your life threatened in ways other that the norm.
If you just get a small one and only bring it with you to places you feel nervous about you should be fine. I'm assuming you drive, just keep it somewhere within reach in the car, glove box, center console, wherever you can while keeping it concealed but within reach. Chances are, your parents are going to be understanding about that and would more than likely agree with you on it.

Don't take this the wrong way, but I'm glad I don't live in the USA. Frankly I don't want to live anywhere where I don't feel comfortable leaving my house without a gun.
Don't take this the wrong way, but I'm glad I don't live in the USA. Frankly I don't want to live anywhere where I don't feel comfortable leaving my house without a gun.
Maybe it's an attitude thing, rather than location; I'm British and haven't feel the need to carry a gun in either London or the US(although not Chicago which I hear is infested with armed criminals), so maybe the British are just tougher/less scared.Don't take this the wrong way, but there were several times in my recent visit to London that I was uncomfortable that I didn't have one...

Your whole country has a population roughly HALF the size of the city of New York..
So it would be fairly easy to keep all the subjects controlled.. Because you are a monarchy, thereby making you all subjects.. And kings do love to have obedient, subservient little subjects..

See, even more than restrictive gun laws, this is the attitude that makes me nuts. It's the same law in Canada, and likely other places that I would/will never live.
If someone attacks me, or some other person in my vicinity, they don't deserve a fair fight. I owe them nothing, and I will do whatever it takes to end the aggression, whether it be by gun, knife, or crowbar.
I'm not a violent guy and have never been in a fight in my life (48 years now), but gawd forbid the criminal gets hurt as result of their crime!

Maybe it's an attitude thing, rather than location; I'm British and haven't feel the need to carry a gun in either London or the US(although not Chicago which I hear is infested with armed criminals), so maybe the British are just tougher/less scared.![]()
Aww, did I hit a nerve?![]()
Not even on your best day.
I'll say it again: I have less of an issue with firearm restrictions than with the concept of trying a crime victim for the level of force they used in resisting that crime.

now me personally I will be getting my concealed carry permit when i get back to the states and it will be a federal one so yay for me not illegal to carry it in any state.
You plan to go into federal law enforcement? I'm pretty sure there is no "federal one" for "civilians."
also look at the size of the gun you want to get. yeah a 45 is awesome and all but thats a long barrel that you have to pull out, a lot larger hammer that you have to cock back, among other reasons. so look at probably a 9 mm or something that is in the mid range there.
Just to clear up potential myths from forming....a .45 has virtually the same primer as a .45 or .50 for that matter. The force to set of the round is therefore almost identical. The "hammer" has the same striking distance. Also MOST concealed firearms these days are DA (dual action). Pulling the trigger lifts and releases the "hammer" in one pull. Furthermore what research and experience is showing us is that a wound doesn't usually stop a perp. It's the transfer of kinetic energy that will knock a person over, cause disorientation etc. While the 9mm has speed that translates to kinetic energy the size of the bullet relative to the speed means that your chances for over penetration is greater then with a larger caliber. Taking all of this into consideration if a bullet passes through a body there is little to no transfer of energy.
Most cases where a person uses a firearm in self defense the engagement takes place under 30 feet. The only purpose of a longer barrel is greater accuracy. My .40 has a 3.5" barrel and I can hit a silhouette with reasonable accuracy at 25 yards ( about 75 feet). For that matter almost all carry weapons have a barrel between 2" and 4", any longer and you probably wouldn't carry it.
The biggest downside to carrying a large caliber pistol is the recoil a larger round gives of making it more difficult for an inexperienced shooter to control.
In the end anything is better then nothing. But with the right training anyone can carry a .40 or .45.
Also the other reason people like to stay armed is remind it's government who's in charge. Remember a person with a firearm has options. The person without is a victim.
I don't ask that anyone trust what I way..I encourage you to do your own research.

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLPLEASE don't get me started with the government!!
See, technically we're all owned by the government, at least in the U.S. I mean, who makes the laws, the government; who raises taxes, the government; who has to have their finger on EVERYTHING in the world, the U.S. government. Plain and simple...the U.S. government only cares about 2 things, money and power. Do you really think our government gives a sh*t about us? or about the whole "going green, saving green" bullsh*t?, ABSOLUTELY NOT. Just like everything else, we are just a number (statistic) to them and if you have a social security card.....you're government property!!

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
We have governments for a reason you know
And dont tell me your one of those stupid Republican Climate Change skeptics
Times like these I'm glad I'm European![]()
HE'S THE ROBBER!!
![]()
I never said you owned them13 posts and calling people stupid? I grew up in europe...why do you think I own guns, atvs, big diesel trucks now?
