• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Modern warfare 2 or black ops?

T

Tempest795

Newbie
Can't believe it hasn't been thrown out there already or maybe I missed it but what would rather play


Also what do u use in the game of ur choice maybe help some ppl out with choosing the right loadout for them
 
I like MF2 for the 2 player co op mode. As far as best build for MP search the net. There are plenty of peoples builds out there that rock.
 
Black ops for sure! About 2 Prestage both game. Went back for a black ops after quiet a few months, Could still do well. Tried MW2, did ok but way to much cheesy Stuff eg. tubing, hacks. To bad $100 game year or whatever down the track, worthless.
 
I cant stand MW2 because of sniping all there is are trickshots it frustrates me to a point of no return not because i cant do it its just because what are the chances of jumping from a building doing a 360 and just firing a 50 cal from the hip and hitting someone
 
I like Black Ops much more. My FPS background started in Counter-Strike, so I'm used to having ~5 shots to kill and actually aiming for heads. MW2 was fun, but it was such a twitch shooter and came down to who was lucky enough to see the other first, since 2-3 shots and it was over. I love the fact you can turn around in Black Ops and win a gunfight if you're a better shot. In MW2 if you got caught from behind, you didn't have a chance to retalitate.

I'm also a huge fan of the toned down kill streaks in Black Ops, and that they don't stack. It's an FPS, I play it to shoot people, yeah the UAV and a killstreak that gives you 2-3 free kills is nice as a reward for those doing well. But in MW2 when you get more kills with air support than your gun, it's stupid. If I want to shoot people from a jet I'll go play Ace Combat or something. The nuke kill streak promoted so much camping and lame OMA tactics, I'm glad it's gone.

I did find MW2 fun, until the community ruined it with Danger Close/One Man Army noob tubes. And as xepic said, the sniping trick shots ruin it too.
 
ParishL31 said:
I like Black Ops much more. My FPS background started in Counter-Strike, so I'm used to having ~5 shots to kill and actually aiming for heads. MW2 was fun, but it was such a twitch shooter and came down to who was lucky enough to see the other first, since 2-3 shots and it was over. I love the fact you can turn around in Black Ops and win a gunfight if you're a better shot. In MW2 if you got caught from behind, you didn't have a chance to retalitate.

I'm also a huge fan of the toned down kill streaks in Black Ops, and that they don't stack. It's an FPS, I play it to shoot people, yeah the UAV and a killstreak that gives you 2-3 free kills is nice as a reward for those doing well. But in MW2 when you get more kills with air support than your gun, it's stupid. If I want to shoot people from a jet I'll go play Ace Combat or something. The nuke kill streak promoted so much camping and lame OMA tactics, I'm glad it's gone.

I did find MW2 fun, until the community ruined it with Danger Close/One Man Army noob tubes. And as xepic said, the sniping trick shots ruin it too.
Click to expand...
So you dont like real word situations? Someone walks up behind you in a real world combat situation. 10/10 chances your dead.
 
I've played both, in addition to being a CS 1.6 and CS:S player of old I've also played all the CoD games thus far.

For me I enjoyed MW2 the most, probably because it was such a change from WaW, then Black Ops came out and to me it felt like MW2 without sniping and worse maps. I wasn't one of those quick scope trick shot people either. Honestly I had no problem besting them with a UMP or AR. I do think sniping is an important part, without a common enemy to unite against Black Ops didn't have the same last appeal, for me anyway.

I'll probably play both this summer more when school is over.
 
Dark Jedi said:
So you dont like real word situations? Someone walks up behind you in a real world combat situation. 10/10 chances your dead.
Click to expand...

Not in video games. I'm quite the fan of the better skilled player winning 9/10 times rather than who was lucky enough to find them first (sure it may be realistic but I'm playing a video game). I'm not a fan of the more realistic games like the Tom Clancy games anyways. MW2 is far from realistic anyways, any CoD actually.
 
Thanks guys for the replies keep it going!!! But for me idk such a tough decision someone made a good point is that if ur the better shot u have more chance of winning and another point is black ops makes u have to practice a little bit hence the reason for combat training Jack the difficulty up and they play better than most online guys. As mw2 I agree that the add on killstreak rewards can be a little cheap and prohibit camping but I only like mw2 for hardcore and third person other than that don't really play it that much and quick scopers and noob tubers will be in any game that has noob tubes and snipers there are just those kinds of people out there :D but happy gaming and keep posting ur ideas.
 
Ugh, I'm going to have to drop a couple more bills to get a new graphics card for BF3 haha. I remember when my 9600GT was high end, oh the joys of being a PC gamer.
 
Fact is tho, most people who play Sabotage just use it as a long TDM.... I have been yelled at and get hate mail for planting the bomb.. whats up with that!!

On topic tho, I like Bo more till BF3 cause there are less cheap tactics.
 
MW2 for a bit of fun with ridicolous sniping and noob tubing.

Black ops for a more serious and less frustrating game.

MW1 was the boy though :D
 
BFBC2 until BF3 comes out.

Honestly, I tried MW2 and got to level 65, but by then I was so tired of all the blatant BS that I gave up on the game without trying to prestige. BC2 I still play the hell out of. Black Ops I played the campaign and liked it, but I quit the multiplayer after level 20 because it was just more MW2 BS

I just prefer the squad tactics approach of Battlefield, I guess. It's hard as shit to find a party in MW2 or BO that plays with active team tactics and communication.
 
dark4181 said:
I just prefer the squad tactics approach of Battlefield, I guess. It's hard as shit to find a party in MW2 or BO that plays with active team tactics and communication.
Click to expand...

Not for nothing but it's rare that you find any party on BF:BC2 that communicates at all. The majority of players just know what to do without even having to say anything to them. In the CoD games, everyone runs around like chickens w/o a head just trying to get kills.
 
dark4181 said:
I just prefer the squad tactics approach of Battlefield, I guess. It's hard as shit to find a party in MW2 or BO that plays with active team tactics and communication.
Click to expand...

Even with a full party playing together with communication, I've still run into randoms that have beaten us. It happens quite often too. The nature of CoD allows for lone soldier play, one person on the other team playing well can overcome a full team. CoD just doesn't emphasize team work and it doesn't revolve around it.

In Gears or BF, if you try to go lone soldier you'll get walked any day of the week against a full team. In CoD you have a chance of coming out on top and carrying the entire team by yourself.

Yes, teamwork does allow for easier wins in CoD. I'm just saying it's not essential for victory as it is in other FPS games, and it has much less importance than other series.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom