I have heard all of those before, but rarely do I see widespread agreement with many. And that list shrinks if we're just talking about HTC...
10 goes away cause not all HTC phones have kickstands
9 goes away cause not all HTC have WiMAX
8 might be legit. I've heard Droid Inc and Evo have shitty battery life
7 goes away cause HTC makes screens big and small.
6: never heard of the 16:10 gripe, and not something associated with HTC, like PenTile or SAMOLED is with Samsung.
5 goes away because it's HTC in-fighting and isn't a comparison with the other two: Samsung and Motorola
4 is hardly a knock on HTC when Samsung is pretty much the only user of SAMOLED with a few exceptions
3 seems legit
2: not much merit here. I've always felt that Sense is the most preferred overlay. No one talks about wanting to flash motoblur or touchwiz. But tons of people want Sense, or a Sense theme
1: too generic and subjective to really be a stereotype.
So back to what I was saying, there are some universal and undeniable gripes about Samsung and Motorola. Not subjective or fanboyish at all.
GPS was indeed shitty for several of last year's Samsung phones. Samsung as also admitted that they sucked in the upgrades department. It's also no surprise that Motorola encrypts their bootloaders.
So I ask again: what type of stigma is there for HTC that's universal among a lot of HTC phones and is not a subjective "mine's better than yours" gripe?
-edit-
ok, I see that your response was mostly toward my comment about Evo 4G being universally liked as an Android phone. But my question was really posed at HTC because you said
we weren't smart enough to buy Samsung or Motorola.