Root OE overclocking.. (maybe)

bll7 · Oct 7, 2012

as of now i use giantpunes kernal, yes it is wonderful. But i would love to see if we can get this wonderful, stubborn device up to 2Mhz.. i know this is probably impossible but what do you guys think?

**MAKE THIS B*TCH LIKE SHE IS ON STEROIDS**

David Dubz · Oct 7, 2012

bll7 said:
as of now i use giantpunes kernal, yes it is wonderful. But i would love to see if we can get this wonderful, stubborn device up to 2Mhz.. i know this is probably impossible but what do you guys think?
**MAKE THIS B*TCH LIKE SHE IS ON STEROIDS**

Hmmmm idk. It's already overclocked at 1200 as it is. I don't think it would last long at 2000. That's pretty insane.

bll7 · Oct 7, 2012

David Dubz said:
Hmmmm idk. It's already overclocked at 1200 as it is. I don't think it would last long at 2000. That's pretty insane.

yes, this is true, but this little amazing, shitty, cheap, brilliant device has already impressed me and to be honest, i want to see what she has got, she is a "sleeper"

Dark One · Oct 7, 2012

Here are a couple of relevant posts from our resident geniuses. You can do it but you probably shouldn't.

drewwalton1921 said:
You can allow further overclocking by adding more values in acpuclock-7x30.c (in the kernel source) but you have to provide appropriate voltages as well. I wouldn't be surprised if this thing could overclock to 2.0GHz but it might be dangerous and would severely decrease the lifespan of the CPU.

giantpune said:

There is a link to the source in the first post. And there is a table already of frequencies and voltages that goes up to 1.9GHz. Only certain frequencies are added to the list for scaling, with the highest one at 1.6Ghz. You should be able to tell it to use the 1.9GHz manually. I personally feel that 1.6 is already at the line, and never have tried any of the ranges above that.

This is the full table. Entries that start with a 1 as the first parameter are used for the auto-scaling governors.

Code:

static struct clkctl_acpu_speed acpu_freq_tbl[] = {
	{ 0, 24576,SRC_LPXO, 0, 0,  30720000,  900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	{ 0, 61440,   PLL_3, 5, 11, 61440000,  900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	{ 1, 122880,  PLL_3, 5, 5,  61440000,  900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	{ 0, 184320,  PLL_3, 5, 4,  61440000,  900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	{ 1, 245760,  PLL_3, 5, 2,  61440000,  900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	{ 1, 368640,  PLL_3, 5, 1,  122800000, 900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	{ 1, 460800,  PLL_1, 2, 0,  153600000, 900, VDD_RAW(900) },
	{ 1, 576000,  PLL_1, 2, 0,  153600000, 950, VDD_RAW(950) },
	{ 1, 652800,  PLL_1, 2, 0,  153600000, 950, VDD_RAW(950) },
	{ 1, 768000,  PLL_1, 2, 0,  153600000, 950, VDD_RAW(950) },
	{ 1, 806400,  PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1000, VDD_RAW(1000), &pll2_tbl[0]},
	{ 1, 921600,  PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1000, VDD_RAW(1000), &pll2_tbl[1]},
	{ 1, 1024000, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1000, VDD_RAW(1000), &pll2_tbl[2]},
	{ 1, 1113000, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1050, VDD_RAW(1050), &pll2_tbl[3]},
	{ 1, 1209600, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1100, VDD_RAW(1100), &pll2_tbl[4]},
	{ 1, 1305600, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1150, VDD_RAW(1150), &pll2_tbl[5]},
	{ 1, 1401600, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1200, VDD_RAW(1200), &pll2_tbl[6]},
	{ 1, 1516800, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1250, VDD_RAW(1250), &pll2_tbl[7]},
	{ 1, 1612800, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1300, VDD_RAW(1350), &pll2_tbl[8]},
	{ 0, 1708800, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1350, VDD_RAW(1350), &pll2_tbl[9]},
	{ 0, 1804800, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1350, VDD_RAW(1350), &pll2_tbl[10]},
	{ 0, 1900800, PLL_2, 3, 0, UINT_MAX, 1450, VDD_RAW(1450), &pll2_tbl[11]},

bll7 · Oct 7, 2012

Dark One said:
Here are a couple of relevant posts from our resident geniuses. You can do it but you probably shouldn't.

do you think you can do this? i am on a mac and it is hell trying to edit any kind of files.... :/

i miss my windows.. lol

Hashtag · Oct 7, 2012

bll7 said:
do you think you can do this? i am on a mac and it is hell trying to edit any kind of files.... :/

i miss my windows.. lol

1.6GHz is pretty good... out of curiosity, what do you have to do on your phone that requires almost as much power as a laptop?

giantpune · Oct 7, 2012

Hashtag said:
1.6GHz is pretty good... out of curiosity, what do you have to do on your phone that requires almost as much power as a laptop?

Hashtag · Oct 7, 2012

To those who dont know, Giantpune has the correct answer to everything.

bll7 · Oct 7, 2012

giantpune said:

giantpune do you ever plan on trying it at 2mhz?

Tyjuice069 · Oct 7, 2012

giantpune said:

I lol'd so badly after watching that picture lol

MStreeter · Oct 7, 2012

bll7 said:
giantpune do you ever plan on trying it at 2mhz?

Oh you can probably clock it up to 5, maybe 6MHz. This is no 8086, but it gets the job done.

Hashtag · Oct 7, 2012

MStreeter said:
Oh you can probably clock it up to 5, maybe 6MHz. This is no 8086, but it gets the job done.

I heard the new Nintendo DS gets up to 15MHz!

bll7 · Oct 7, 2012

Hashtag said:
I heard the new Nintendo DS gets up to 15MHz!

we will have to root the sh*t out of it (; lolol

ktb83 · Oct 7, 2012

bll7 said:
yes, this is true, but this little amazing, shitty, cheap, brilliant device has already impressed me and to be honest, i want to see what she has got, she is a "sleeper"

Yeah, it's really not a good idea, unless you don't care about damaging your phone permanently. Heat, wear, consumes more battery. Not worth it.

bll7 · Oct 7, 2012

ktb83 said:
Yeah, it's really not a good idea, unless you don't care about damaging your phone permanently. Heat, wear, consumes more battery. Not worth it.

yes, i can agree with this. But think if it did run stable, i mean i'm pretty sure no one thought we "giantpune" would get it to 1.6? Miracles do happen my friend

if i decide to test it i will report back.. Still "rock paper scissoring" lol

FoxyDrew · Oct 7, 2012

bll7 said:
yes, i can agree with this. But think if it did run stable, i mean i'm pretty sure no one thought we "giantpune" would get it to 1.6? Miracles do happen my friend if i decide to test it i will report back.. Still "rock paper scissoring" lol

id be happy to try a 2GHz OC i run my elite with 1.6GHz as the maximum and minimum frequencies at all times without any problems (overheat,battery drain etc.) so i doubt 2GHz will be a big difference also the benchmark from stock (1946) skyrocketed with the OC (2902) lol i had them written down anyways i would love to see benchmarks with the 2GHz were already beating dual core phones in quadrant with giantpunes lovely kernel

muselite · Oct 7, 2012

Agreed. If someone would either compile or step by step it for me, I will gladly assume the risk and test a max kernel

giantpune · Oct 7, 2012

bll7 said:
giantpune do you ever plan on trying it at 2mhz?

Not really. I don't want to ruin a $100 toy. You can mail me your phone and a note saying you don't care if I tear it up and then I'll overclock it till it pulls a chernobyl.

bll7 · Oct 7, 2012

giantpune said:
Not really. I don't want to ruin a $100 toy. You can mail me your phone and a note saying you don't care if I tear it up and then I'll overclock it till it pulls a chernobyl.

if you make the kernal for the 2mhz, i will gladly test it.

landonh12 · Oct 7, 2012

bll7 said:
if you make the kernal for the 2mhz, i will gladly test it.

To correct you, it's 2ghz, not mhz. I think the original macintosh from the 80s was faster than 2mhz.

bll7 · Oct 7, 2012

landonh12 said:
To correct you, it's 2ghz, not mhz. I think the original macintosh from the 80s was faster than 2mhz.

this is why i never graduated... ;D stupid auto-correct.

Root OE overclocking.. (maybe)

Member

Android Enthusiast

Member

Android Expert

Member

Android Enthusiast

Android Enthusiast

Android Enthusiast

Member

Newbie

Newbie

Android Enthusiast

Member

Android Enthusiast

Member

Android Enthusiast

Lurker

Android Enthusiast

Member

Android Enthusiast

Member