Milo Willamson
Android Expert
Yeah that is a slight hard pass, I do not want to get on the bandwagon.
-
After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.
Smart Glasses....do you have one or want one????
- Thread starter ocnbrze
- Start date
Meta? Yeah, right... like I need Facebook to see everything I'm seeing, hear everything I'm hearing, and go everywhere I go. Major hard pass. I have Solos smartglasses (without the creepy camera stuff) and I rarely wear them.
well to each their own. i love my meta Raybans. they have come in so handy for my work. and i could careless about data collection. the fact that i can just ask my glasses without having to dig my phone out is very useful to me. and the camera is also very nice to have. i love the fact that i can ask meta what i am seeing or have it translate something that i am looking at is super cool. plus i love the look of both glasses.
so far the oakleys battery life seems to be as advertised. they have lasted all day without needing to charge it. so tomorrow, i have time to go to my optometrist to get my prescription lenses put in. it will take about 2 weeks though.....so i will continue using my Raybans until then.
Last edited:
Here are some picks for comparison.
Which is the lesser evil for data collection and privacy. Facebook or China?
Milo Willamson
Android Expert
China probably.
i changed the title of this thread to be just smart glasses. after doing more research on smart glasses, i realize that there is more to it.
there are various types of smart glasses. xr glasses also called extended reality glasses encompasses virtual reality, VR headsets, and augmented reality or AR glasses. some xr glasses for example can go into 3D and even virtual reality while others cannot.
the Viture glasses are not quite AR depending on the models. the new Luma series will be coming out in a few weeks for the Viture Luma and the Viture Luma Pro. the Viture Luma Ultra and the Viture Luma Beast will be coming out in Sept. and October respectively.....only the Beast should be considered AR glasses as they will have head tracking needed to do both AR and VR content.
Google is coming out with their own XR glasses. the protype currently being promoted has a tiny led screen that displays stuff similar to most smart watches do now. so stuff like directions, text messages and emails can popup and be displayed while you are still able to see your surroundings. there are few that are out now that is similar to google's glasses. just google Even Realities G1 and Haliday AI glasses.....they are very similar to what Google has plans.....think Meta Raybans but with a tiny display. the Raybans and Oakleys that i have are more ai smart glasses. they do not do AR.
so the Viture Luma Pro is what i am considering purchasing. it is not AR because it does not augment anything to your current surroundings. it is mostly a giant screen that is projected through the glasses. sure it has a ton of features....but all in all that is what it is. it needs a power source and needs to be connected to another device like a pc, phone, or handheld gaming devices like my Steam Deck. it is very bright with a reported 1,000 nits, but it supposedly does not do well in bright sunlight mainly because the glasses are not headsets like most vr headsets are. they have shields around the lenses to block out light. the Viture glasses are just that glasses. so light can penetrate above, below and thru the sides of the glasses.
so why am i considering it, you might ask? i am about to get a sleave tattoo which takes many hours and multiple sessions to do. my dog tattoo took over 4 hours to do. i need something to keep my mind occupied while it is being done. my tattoo artist is not that chatty so having a long conversation is something both want. my quest 3 VR headset is just to big a clunky to bring. the Vitures would be perfect for this situation. this is my main reason. but i do plan to travel some next year and these glasses would be perfect to travel with. it is great for streaming and gaming. i do not really need productivity which is suppose to be not quite refined unless you get head tracking with the Luma Beast model.
anyways just thought i add in some info about them that i just learned. thoughts?
there are various types of smart glasses. xr glasses also called extended reality glasses encompasses virtual reality, VR headsets, and augmented reality or AR glasses. some xr glasses for example can go into 3D and even virtual reality while others cannot.
the Viture glasses are not quite AR depending on the models. the new Luma series will be coming out in a few weeks for the Viture Luma and the Viture Luma Pro. the Viture Luma Ultra and the Viture Luma Beast will be coming out in Sept. and October respectively.....only the Beast should be considered AR glasses as they will have head tracking needed to do both AR and VR content.
Google is coming out with their own XR glasses. the protype currently being promoted has a tiny led screen that displays stuff similar to most smart watches do now. so stuff like directions, text messages and emails can popup and be displayed while you are still able to see your surroundings. there are few that are out now that is similar to google's glasses. just google Even Realities G1 and Haliday AI glasses.....they are very similar to what Google has plans.....think Meta Raybans but with a tiny display. the Raybans and Oakleys that i have are more ai smart glasses. they do not do AR.
so the Viture Luma Pro is what i am considering purchasing. it is not AR because it does not augment anything to your current surroundings. it is mostly a giant screen that is projected through the glasses. sure it has a ton of features....but all in all that is what it is. it needs a power source and needs to be connected to another device like a pc, phone, or handheld gaming devices like my Steam Deck. it is very bright with a reported 1,000 nits, but it supposedly does not do well in bright sunlight mainly because the glasses are not headsets like most vr headsets are. they have shields around the lenses to block out light. the Viture glasses are just that glasses. so light can penetrate above, below and thru the sides of the glasses.
so why am i considering it, you might ask? i am about to get a sleave tattoo which takes many hours and multiple sessions to do. my dog tattoo took over 4 hours to do. i need something to keep my mind occupied while it is being done. my tattoo artist is not that chatty so having a long conversation is something both want. my quest 3 VR headset is just to big a clunky to bring. the Vitures would be perfect for this situation. this is my main reason. but i do plan to travel some next year and these glasses would be perfect to travel with. it is great for streaming and gaming. i do not really need productivity which is suppose to be not quite refined unless you get head tracking with the Luma Beast model.
anyways just thought i add in some info about them that i just learned. thoughts?
I'm at the opposite end: productivity would be the main thing I'd want them to have (though TBH a laptop with eyeball tracking which switched focus to the window I'm looking at would probably be all I'd need - provided it had a bash shell, since I can't do anything serious on an OS without one). AR I could have uses for, while gaming would be very low down my priorities.
I wasn't aware of Viture: they look more like something I could use than I expected, though I've only glanced through the marketing stuff so far rather than done any proper digging. Funny thing is that they'd probably be most use to me when travelling: I've got multiple monitors in the office, and a large external monitor at home, but when travelling for work I only have my laptop. So the ability to effectively carry a large monitor in my pocket or bag and slip it on when needed is something I could find useful. I wonder how my sysadmin might feel about that as an alternative to external monitors in my office? (Though the obvious drawback there is that you can't just show someone else what you are looking at).
I wasn't aware of Viture: they look more like something I could use than I expected, though I've only glanced through the marketing stuff so far rather than done any proper digging. Funny thing is that they'd probably be most use to me when travelling: I've got multiple monitors in the office, and a large external monitor at home, but when travelling for work I only have my laptop. So the ability to effectively carry a large monitor in my pocket or bag and slip it on when needed is something I could find useful. I wonder how my sysadmin might feel about that as an alternative to external monitors in my office? (Though the obvious drawback there is that you can't just show someone else what you are looking at).
so viture is gaining a pretty good name in the xr world. at the top are viture and xreal. there are some others out there, but those from what i have seen are at the top. the issue with viture's luma pro is that the camera lense in the middle is currently not ready to use. the software for it is being worked on. once they get that working than productivity is wide open. they have developed an app called spacewalker. in it you can setup multiple screens for computing on. the main problem is that at the moment the app is slow, buggy, and has issues where the screen will drift on its own. once the camera software is finished, then the drift issue should be resolved.
for productivity you might want to look at xreal:
or wait for the Viture Luma Ultra or Beast. the Viture Luma Ultra to maximize productivity you might want to get the neckband as well. the neckband has the google play store and also allows hand gestures among other features. it is not cheap though....going for $300. the Luma Beast uses an entire different screen tech and has the brightest screen of the Luma series lineup.
review of the Luma series:
Last edited:
ozonetrooper
Android Expert
Don't they come with an app for alerts when ICE is in the area ?
so back to my op, the Oakley Meta AI glasses are so much better than the Raybans.....mainly in battery life. with the raybans, i get maybe 4 hours before i have to charge it. the charging case is always nearby because of this. on the other hand, the oakley's so far i get over 8 hours of battery life. the speakers are way better than the raybans as well.
now as far as style, the white of the oakley's is very flashy, but i really like it. it is very hard to miss me when i have them on.......so all in all, i am very happy with them.
now as far as style, the white of the oakley's is very flashy, but i really like it. it is very hard to miss me when i have them on.......so all in all, i am very happy with them.