A.Nonymous
Extreme Android User
Last time I guess since I'm failing to get my point across.
1. Confidentiality agreements are irrelevant. Everyone signs them. I've signed confidentiality agreements and NDAs for my last two employers. It's not unusual.
2. None of this ties to Limbaugh at all. Have any of these anonymous actors claimed they have called the Limbaugh show? Have they claimed that other paid actors have called the Limbaugh show? No. Limbaugh denies it. Premiere claims the service is for voice talent - "Premiere On Call is a recently launched audio service connecting local entertainment radio stations with great voice talent to supplement their programming needs. The service is not utilized by News/Talk programs or stations." That is a reasonable explanation given that they're a radio syndication company. Nothing blows the null hypothesis away here. Even if you have proof that that they've called shows in the past, none of this is any proof that Limbaugh's show has been one of them.
I'm sorry, but you haven't connected the dots here. Assuming for the sake of argument that Premiere OnCall is for fake callers, there's nothing at all linking it to Limbaugh. This is an extremely weak case based solely on conjecture. The premise is believable, but that doesn't make it true. You've got pure conjecture and none of it blows holes in the null hypothesis.
1. Confidentiality agreements are irrelevant. Everyone signs them. I've signed confidentiality agreements and NDAs for my last two employers. It's not unusual.
2. None of this ties to Limbaugh at all. Have any of these anonymous actors claimed they have called the Limbaugh show? Have they claimed that other paid actors have called the Limbaugh show? No. Limbaugh denies it. Premiere claims the service is for voice talent - "Premiere On Call is a recently launched audio service connecting local entertainment radio stations with great voice talent to supplement their programming needs. The service is not utilized by News/Talk programs or stations." That is a reasonable explanation given that they're a radio syndication company. Nothing blows the null hypothesis away here. Even if you have proof that that they've called shows in the past, none of this is any proof that Limbaugh's show has been one of them.
I'm sorry, but you haven't connected the dots here. Assuming for the sake of argument that Premiere OnCall is for fake callers, there's nothing at all linking it to Limbaugh. This is an extremely weak case based solely on conjecture. The premise is believable, but that doesn't make it true. You've got pure conjecture and none of it blows holes in the null hypothesis.