Quickdawn
Newbie
Disregard the post the below as it seems FUD is spreading around the web with the 810 being a overheating beast SOC. All of it coming from one source and then being manipulated to and by other medias.
The SOC should be great and serve its purpose but I'll till wait for the 820 end of 2015.
Thank you all for commenting and spreading your knowledge.
Don't get a SD810 here's why.
Qualcomm is not using its normal magic when making this up coming chip, not to say the chip is bad but the over heating issues make sense seeing how its just tweaked architecture from arm vs what they normally do and make a chip that is different from everyone's arm architecture. Q1 and 2 I believe will be filled with nothing but 810 flagships phones and tablets, and with probably the right under clocking and under volting the SOC could be useful and harness some of the potential of the 64 bit architecture and the octacore benefits. But clocked at 2.8ghz with the gpu probably following close to ~600 mhz i can see where the overheating is happening. With out actually going into the kernel I don't know the overhead write speed and read the cache load and those fun things. But the armv8 architecture is a lot more complex then v7 and I'm sure it's taking a lot longer for Qualcomm to fully optimize the chip with out jumping into the 64bit with out road bumps.
Take it as it is the lg G flex 2 will sport one reviews will come and everyone will know if the 810 is worth the jump from 801 and 805. Unless LG underclocked it did some custom kernel and tweaking so the damn thing doesn't catch fire 2.8 ghz will be overkill on a 5.5 1080p panel. Worst case scenario overheating is true the device will be slow to respond due to heat and a lot of reboot cycles to cool the system down.
Now for good news the SD820 will be what Qualcomm is known for and will be a beast of a SOC, the key is to be patient and wait for the end of the year for it to hit.
I don't want to muddy any waters and bring exynos up but for what it's due Samsung is doing great now with the little.Big configuration and is finally seeing it catching up to Qualcomm 805 processor and holding its own. And that just tells you how efficient Qualcomm made the 800, 801, and 805. Which I believe was one of 2014 best SOC. Apples a8 was meh and designed for a OS that doesn't push boundaries. Hence why it's a dual core clocked 1.3ghz I believe. It's enough since the system doesn't require such a taxing toll on the SOC.
And the games are coded differently for ios and Android so that's why a dual core with a gpu on equal grounds can push just as hard that and less pixels to push out.
Apple has a perfect harmony between resolution and performance requirements. Where as android is multi platformed and takes a bit for it to be optimized.
Sorry rants over God bless android lol. That's my take on the 810 I would not buy a phone with that SOC in a phone not because I don't like or hate Qualcomm but because it's not much of a gain from the older 32bit generation of the 800 family.
The SOC should be great and serve its purpose but I'll till wait for the 820 end of 2015.
Thank you all for commenting and spreading your knowledge.
Don't get a SD810 here's why.
Qualcomm is not using its normal magic when making this up coming chip, not to say the chip is bad but the over heating issues make sense seeing how its just tweaked architecture from arm vs what they normally do and make a chip that is different from everyone's arm architecture. Q1 and 2 I believe will be filled with nothing but 810 flagships phones and tablets, and with probably the right under clocking and under volting the SOC could be useful and harness some of the potential of the 64 bit architecture and the octacore benefits. But clocked at 2.8ghz with the gpu probably following close to ~600 mhz i can see where the overheating is happening. With out actually going into the kernel I don't know the overhead write speed and read the cache load and those fun things. But the armv8 architecture is a lot more complex then v7 and I'm sure it's taking a lot longer for Qualcomm to fully optimize the chip with out jumping into the 64bit with out road bumps.
Take it as it is the lg G flex 2 will sport one reviews will come and everyone will know if the 810 is worth the jump from 801 and 805. Unless LG underclocked it did some custom kernel and tweaking so the damn thing doesn't catch fire 2.8 ghz will be overkill on a 5.5 1080p panel. Worst case scenario overheating is true the device will be slow to respond due to heat and a lot of reboot cycles to cool the system down.
Now for good news the SD820 will be what Qualcomm is known for and will be a beast of a SOC, the key is to be patient and wait for the end of the year for it to hit.
I don't want to muddy any waters and bring exynos up but for what it's due Samsung is doing great now with the little.Big configuration and is finally seeing it catching up to Qualcomm 805 processor and holding its own. And that just tells you how efficient Qualcomm made the 800, 801, and 805. Which I believe was one of 2014 best SOC. Apples a8 was meh and designed for a OS that doesn't push boundaries. Hence why it's a dual core clocked 1.3ghz I believe. It's enough since the system doesn't require such a taxing toll on the SOC.
And the games are coded differently for ios and Android so that's why a dual core with a gpu on equal grounds can push just as hard that and less pixels to push out.
Apple has a perfect harmony between resolution and performance requirements. Where as android is multi platformed and takes a bit for it to be optimized.
Sorry rants over God bless android lol. That's my take on the 810 I would not buy a phone with that SOC in a phone not because I don't like or hate Qualcomm but because it's not much of a gain from the older 32bit generation of the 800 family.
Last edited:
