• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Droid Charge reviews

Great review. I had the TB but returned it because of the battery life. Nice to see LTE is not the problem, as the Charge did much better than the TB in their tests. Too bad the call quality isn't great. That is REALLY important to me (it is a phone after all). I guess I'm stuck waiting for the Revolution, Bionic, or Samsung's dual core....
 
I am sure hoping that other reviews come in saying the phone voice quality is better than what this reviewer found. There can be so many variables as to voice connections, maybe there is some reason (outside of the Droid Charge itself) that led this reviewer's phone calls to be not so great.

I say I'm hoping this because I am considering getting this phone. I know the Samsung S2 or Droid Bionic will be more powerful, but I'm looking to get a new phone sooner than those will be available in the US.

When Verizon stores get the Droid Charge in stock and for sale, I will definitely test out the phone/voice quality -- I might be old-school, but even with all the great multi-media features of a smartphone I still do ALSO use it as a phone, to make voice-to-voice phone calls!!!
 
I am sure hoping that other reviews come in saying the phone voice quality is better than what this reviewer found. There can be so many variables as to voice connections, maybe there is some reason (outside of the Droid Charge itself) that led this reviewer's phone calls to be not so great.

I say I'm hoping this because I am considering getting this phone. I know the Samsung S2 or Droid Bionic will be more powerful, but I'm looking to get a new phone sooner than those will be available in the US.

When Verizon stores get the Droid Charge in stock and for sale, I will definitely test out the phone/voice quality -- I might be old-school, but even with all the great multi-media features of a smartphone I still do ALSO use it as a phone, to make voice-to-voice phone calls!!!

Steve,I'm eager to replace my POS Storm SOON, so I'll at least give the Charge a try, in store if for nothing more than seeing how the Samsung phones are progressing, up to the SGS II.
 
Why would anyone pay premium for this? Weak chipset and firmware (hence the low benchmarks) and weak reception. Buying these half hearted efforts only encourages VZW to continue their half hearted device strategy. Premium price and two year contract for this? Let it fail.

Added: Seriously, let it fail.
 
Why would anyone pay premium for this? Weak chipset and firmware (hence the low benchmarks) and weak reception. Buying these half hearted efforts only encourages VZW to continue their half hearted device strategy. Premium price and two year contract for this? Let it fail.

Added: Seriously, let it fail.

1. Because they want 4g with reasonable battery life.
2. Because they may find it on sale for less than $300 retail.
3. Because super amoled screens are the best.
4. Because the Hummingbird has the best gpu for a verizon phone.

Also, I have read that the synthetic benchmarks are not a good predictor of hummingbird chip performance.
 
Why would anyone pay premium for this? Weak chipset and firmware (hence the low benchmarks) and weak reception. Buying these half hearted efforts only encourages VZW to continue their half hearted device strategy. Premium price and two year contract for this? Let it fail.

Added: Seriously, let it fail.


+ 1
 
Why would anyone pay premium for this? Weak chipset and firmware (hence the low benchmarks) and weak reception. Buying these half hearted efforts only encourages VZW to continue their half hearted device strategy. Premium price and two year contract for this? Let it fail.

Added: Seriously, let it fail.


+2
 
1. Because they want 4g with reasonable battery life.
2. Because they may find it on sale for less than $300 retail.
3. Because super amoled screens are the best.
4. Because the Hummingbird has the best gpu for a verizon phone.

Also, I have read that the synthetic benchmarks are not a good predictor of hummingbird chip performance.


U left out Touch Wiz...lol!
If I wanted a UI that looked like ios I'd get an iPhone, not to mention the Charge is not smooth at all, suffers from screen lag...just like the Fascinate did. Single core phones can be smooth also, its that touch wiz garbage that bogs it down. I agree with Rush, I hope this phone fails. VZW should be releasing the Gingerbread Galaxy S 2 right now, not this half ass Droid wannabe.
 
U left out Touch Wiz...lol!
If I wanted a UI that looked like ios I'd get an iPhone, not to mention the Charge is not smooth at all, suffers from screen lag...just like the Fascinate did. Single core phones can be smooth also, its that touch wiz garbage that bogs it down. I agree with Rush, I hope this phone fails. VZW should be releasing the Gingerbread Galaxy S 2 right now, not this half ass Droid wannabe.

Regarding the UI, some of the folks here prefer Android over ios. Has anybody read reviews on how touch wiz performs on the Charge? Just because it was laggy on the Fascinate/Galaxy, that does not mean it is laggy on the Charge...perhaps touch wiz has been updated or upgraded to run more smoothly on a new phone.
 
I had touchwiz on the galaxy S and it's the same version on this phone. Safe to say touchwiz sucked donkey and I immediately replaced it with launcherpro. Been on Sense with the tbolt now and have no desire to replace it with anything.
 
Regarding the UI, some of the folks here prefer Android over ios. Has anybody read reviews on how touch wiz performs on the Charge? Just because it was laggy on the Fascinate/Galaxy, that does not mean it is laggy on the Charge...perhaps touch wiz has been updated or upgraded to run more smoothly on a new phone.


lol...I would think most folks here do prefer (including myslef) Android to ios! However as JC as stated, it's the same version as the Fascinate, along with the same Hummingbird...Needless to say, it's a phone that is not going to get a ton of love. If you like TouchWiz, I'd recommend waiting for the Galaxy S 2 to launch.
 
Why would anyone pay premium for this? Weak chipset and firmware (hence the low benchmarks) and weak reception. Buying these half hearted efforts only encourages VZW to continue their half hearted device strategy. Premium price and two year contract for this? Let it fail.

Added: Seriously, let it fail.

Every post you make here is the same damn complaint. If you hate it so much, why are you still bothering the people who are genuinely interested in the phone?

Oh no, Verizon's charging $300 for a Fascinate with HDMI Out + better battery + better screen + better CPU + more RAM + 32GB MicroSD + better reception + better call quality + no bloat (this is a Droid-branded phone).

Oh, wait, that's practically a different phone.

You couldn't be more wrong. The low benchmark score is because this is running RFS, the same filesystem that made the Galaxy S line score low on benchmarks. Which can be replaced with an ext4-based custom ROM as soon as we get root (someone reported already getting root using SuperOneClick in a different thread I can't be arsed to find).

The CPU in this is NOT the same as the one in the Galaxy S. It is still a 1GHz Hummingbird, but it's a 2nd-gen one.

The only downside on this phone, and it's an ENORMOUS one, is the lack of an LED notification light. How did that even happen? :confused:

Will I be buying this? Probably not, the Galaxy S2 just looks too good (as long as it does indeed have LTE in it, which would be worth compromising its advertised thinness). But I'd take the Charge over the ThunderBolt any day.
 
shadowdude -- why is the lack of an LED notification light such a big deal? (asking honestly, not to be argumentative) ...
 
shadowdude -- why is the lack of an LED notification light such a big deal? (asking honestly, not to be argumentative) ...

I think it's a big deal personally because that light is a very easy way to tell if you have missed calls, emails/texts in the queue, etc. It's just more of a hassle to have to check manually when you could just look at the light. Android's all about the amazing notification system; without that light, you're stranded when the phone's screen is off.
 
shadowdude, Thanks for the explanation. I see what you're saying. I guess that I tend to un-lock my screen and check so often for all sorts of things (emails, phone calls, baseball scores, weather, Facebook, etc etc) that the absence of a notification light doesn't bother me that much.

The other thing to consider is that, most likely, in ANY model of phone there will be some feature we don't like or some spec that we wanted to be better or some missing feature we want. It's always gonna be a bit of a trade-off, no matter what phone one gets. To me, the ability to walk around with such a powerful device in one's pocket that connects us with the world -- with people and with information and with entertainment -- in ways that would have been considered science fiction not very long ago makes me see the glass as 9/10 full, at most 1/10 empty!
 
Oh no, Verizon's charging $300 for a Fascinate with HDMI Out + better battery + better screen + better CPU + more RAM + 32GB MicroSD + better reception + better call quality + no bloat (this is a Droid-branded phone).

Oh, wait, that's practically a different phone.

You couldn't be more wrong. The low benchmark score is because this is running RFS, the same filesystem that made the Galaxy S line score low on benchmarks. Which can be replaced with an ext4-based custom ROM as soon as we get root (someone reported already getting root using SuperOneClick in a different thread I can't be arsed to find).

The CPU in this is NOT the same as the one in the Galaxy S. It is still a 1GHz Hummingbird, but it's a 2nd-gen one.

I agree to most of your points. But where did you see that it's got refreshed Hummingbird and more RAM than Fascinate? Do you have link?
 
shadowdude, Thanks for the explanation. I see what you're saying. I guess that I tend to un-lock my screen and check so often for all sorts of things (emails, phone calls, baseball scores, weather, Facebook, etc etc) that the absence of a notification light doesn't bother me that much.

The other thing to consider is that, most likely, in ANY model of phone there will be some feature we don't like or some spec that we wanted to be better or some missing feature we want. It's always gonna be a bit of a trade-off, no matter what phone one gets. To me, the ability to walk around with such a powerful device in one's pocket that connects us with the world -- with people and with information and with entertainment -- in ways that would have been considered science fiction not very long ago makes me see the glass as 9/10 full, at most 1/10 empty!

Yeah, I agree, it's not the end of the world for the phone, but I'm definitely going to be less willing to buy a phone with no LED notification. Just because I personally find it extremely useful.

As you say though, no phone is perfect because we all want different things in a phone. I know I'd love a 5" dual-core Nexus on Verizon with a slide-out keyboard. That'll probably never be built though because almost nobody will want it (I'm probably one of the few interested in gigantic keyboards on phones because I do have large hands).

I agree to most of your points. But where did you see that it's got refreshed Hummingbird and more RAM than Fascinate? Do you have link?

jinwons' post above mine contains a review. First sentence:

"The second-generation 1GHz Hummingbird processor and 328MB of RAM do a good job on the Samsung Droid Charge – for the most part."

I believe the Fascinate only had 256MB RAM (correct me if I'm wrong), so this means the Charge has a better CPU and more RAM than the Fascinate did.
 
tavenger5 -- Very useful review you posted (and it was particularly interesting to see the photos of how the color saturation is almost TOO much on this phone ...I read on another review that if you opt out of auto-brightness and raise the brightness level, the colors look more natural)...

Two questions for you, I'd love to hear your answers:
-- Did you test out VOICE QUALITY on phone calls (some reviews have complained that voices sound robotic and/or tinny)?
-- Did you experience the same problem Phandroid's own Rob experienced with web browsing (in his review, he found that although data downloaded quickly, there was quite a lag before web pages rendered on the screen)?

Thanks!!!
 
tavenger5 -- Very useful review you posted (and it was particularly interesting to see the photos of how the color saturation is almost TOO much on this phone ...I read on another review that if you opt out of auto-brightness and raise the brightness level, the colors look more natural)...

Two questions for you, I'd love to hear your answers:
-- Did you test out VOICE QUALITY on phone calls (some reviews have complained that voices sound robotic and/or tinny)?
-- Did you experience the same problem Phandroid's own Rob experienced with web browsing (in his review, he found that although data downloaded quickly, there was quite a lag before web pages rendered on the screen)?

Thanks!!!

Glad you like it. I did see the auto brightness setting, but in my case turning it off made the screen brighter and even more saturated. Keep in mind that when those pics were taken the screen probably turned it self down under the photo lamps.

I did test the call quality and didn't notice anything out of the ordinary with the sound reproduction.

I'm actually going to add in a note about javascript making the browser scrolling clunky. That's definitely a bug.

Something I found interesting btw - When I played with the phone in Jan at CES the battery was 1500mAh - it's now 1600mAh. Samsung was obviously working on making the battery life longer.
 
Back
Top Bottom