• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Galaxy Nexus i9250 vs SGS2 i9100

mrvirginia

Android Expert
i've been playing around with my new Galaxy Nexus for about 2hrs now so i'm not going to have a whole lot to say at first. i did want to go ahead and get some stuff out of the way though for anyone who might be sitting on the fence because they own an SGS2.

Software
i'm not going to speak much on software. i was running MIUI 2.3.7 on the SGS2 and i can tell you that i still love that ROM. if it was out today for the Galaxy Nexus, i'd be hard pressed not to try it out. ICS in comparison to TouchWiz is another story. i thought TouchWiz was better than Gingerbread AOSP, but this isn't the case for ICS. this may be because it's so new to me. to be honest i love the new menus of ICS. for now that's about all i can say really stands out.

edit: i just noticed Gmail is different. i love the new Gmail app in comparison. when you select the check box of a message, new options appear at the bottom. this is evident of more polish on the app itself and i'm sure the same can be said about various other apps. i don't like how the contact photo was removed from the Google Voice widget. also, i don't like how the widgets are setup now. instead of long pressing on the screen, you have to open your app drawer and go to your widgets there.

edit: transitions are all over the place on ICS. example, there's a lot within even the messaging app. very smooth looking! slick, if you will.

Hardware
now this is where the Galaxy Nexus trumps my SGS2 in many ways. the first thing i did was hold both devices in both hands. you won't be able to tell a difference in weight of the two. the only reason i know the GNex is heavier is because of it's spec sheet.

overall feel of the device in the hand is much nicer than my rectangular SGS2. it's not awkward to hit the sleep/wake button or reach anywhere on the screen. i also love the clean face of the GNex. nothing on the front except an earpiece. no writing or anything else like that. i was a little disappointed that the outer part of the GNex is some sort of plastic, whereas part of the SGS2 is some sort of metal and then plastic.

one of the most disappointing things about the GNex in comparison to the SGS2 is the screen. everyone can swear up and down that it's beautiful, every review, but believe me, the SGS2 has the better screen even at such a lower res. to me it seems more washed out, and i can tell the Pentile Matrix is present. the on screen back/home/running apps button gives it away immediately, as does the lock on the lockscreen. if you are used to a Super AMOLED Plus screen and it's your favorite thing about your phone out of anything else, don't get a GNex. if you're a previous owner of a Super AMOLED screen, have some kind of phone with a Pentile Matrix, or the screen isn't all that important then you'll be fine. it isn't that bad, and i'm not sending mine back because of this.

why am i not sending this back over my SGS2? i wanted a pure Google phone and i stand by that decision. the feel of the phone in my hand is better than any phone i've ever held before. ICS software is killer thus far. no complaints here. Gingerbread + Honeycomb on speed? i'd say yup.

if anyone has any questions regarding anything i've said above, please feel free to ask. cheers! :)

edit:
Sound (speaker)
some were curious about this in another thread and i assumed that the speaker would be just as loud since both devices are from Samsung. wrong! the SGS2 has a louder speaker. i've always thought it was too loud on the SGS2 though, so much so that i thought i was going to blow it. i always turned the volume down a notch or two. the GNex has a lower one, but it seems to be where i would always turn mine down to. (i've updated this since playing old sounds on the new device).
 
So basically, no matter what phone it is, if it has Pentile, in some way, shape or form someone will notice it. And the search for the perfect screen continues...lol.

There is a thread, if you havent seen it.... what is your take on this comparing the GS2 to the G Nex:

http://androidforums.com/samsung-galaxy-nexus/452466-noisy-sparkly-screen.html

Can you load up some games, play and see if the the buttons are gone?
They can be regular games like Angry Birds. I like my RAZR....but miss the hard buttons of my DX1 now... Too many accidental Home presses is starting to get on my nerves. I think its because Moto has it on the RAZR where swiping up on the bottom of the screen brings up the different screens. In landscape mode swiping or hitting the right side of the screen can be frustrating playing games. Either that or I'm trying to use too much of the screen...lol
 
So basically, no matter what phone it is, if it has Pentile, in some way, shape or form someone will notice it. And the search for the perfect screen continues...lol.

There is a thread, if you havent seen it.... what is your take on this comparing the GS2 to the G Nex:

http://androidforums.com/samsung-galaxy-nexus/452466-noisy-sparkly-screen.html

Can you load up some games, play and see if the the buttons are gone?
They can be regular games like Angry Birds. I like my RAZR....but miss the hard buttons of my DX1 now... Too many accidental Home presses is starting to get on my nerves. I think its because Moto has it on the RAZR where swiping up on the bottom of the screen brings up the different screens. In landscape mode swiping or hitting the right side of the screen can be frustrating playing games. Either that or I'm trying to use too much of the screen...lol

the buttons stayed on screen when i played Angry Birds
also, i think the SGS2 and iPhone have the best screens on a cellphone thus far. aren't there some qHD ones without Pentile though? RAZR? i haven't seen it yet so maybe it has taken the cake...


added Sound (speaker) comparison to above post.
 
This is why no matter how many reviews and comparing I see with a device,I go and check it out myself. Most of the reviews I have seen, thinks the screen display is better than the SGS2.
 
This is why no matter how many reviews and comparing I see with a device,I go and check it out myself. Most of the reviews I have seen, thinks the screen display is better than the SGS2.

Indeed. Most of the tech and customer reviews I've seen on the G-Nex say it's the best display they've seen, period. Even comparing it to other devices outside of phones.

Having said that, I don't see how anyone would be disappointed with the display, even coming from a GS2 or iPhone 4/4S. It's not like you're going to be counting pixels on it like you can with Motorola phones. The RAZRs display was mediocre though, IMO, even though it is the same type of display, except just qHD instead of HD.
 
Unfortunately there are very few of us who notice the inferiority of the pentile display. It's amazing how many people believe what they hear even after seeing with their own eyes.
 
the buttons stayed on screen when i played Angry Birds
also, i think the SGS2 and iPhone have the best screens on a cellphone thus far. aren't there some qHD ones without Pentile though? RAZR? i haven't seen it yet so maybe it has taken the cake...


added Sound (speaker) comparison to above post.

I think your eye is used to clarity of SAMOLED plus screen.:)

The qhd screen on Razr is pentile SAMOLED. Samsung will roll out HD SAMOLED plus with RGB stripe pixels next year probably in SGSIII.
 
it's not pixel count or resolution or etc, it's that you can see that screen door effect on the display that detracts from someone saying it's "the best". how could it be the best if you see this?
 
It's funny to me when people complain about the resolution of the GS2 display. If you have a problem, ask yourself this...if you didn't know what the resolution on that display was, do you think you'd find any problems with it just from looking at it?

The RGB subpixels do a lot to make up for the resolution on the SAMOLED+ displays. an HD SAMOLED+ screen is going to look amazing...it will probably be the nicest screen on any phone and won't be beaten for a while.
 
Back
Top Bottom