Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yikes. Much of this discussion has been terribly misinformed. People have commented on what things work and what do not, but no one seems to have understood that there are too many intersecting issues to make a broad statement about particular players being gapless.
Here's the real deal: MP3s were never designed for gapless playback. This is because an MP3 file's length must always be a multiple of a certain fixed chunk of time. If the song's length isn't miraculously some multiple of that time, the file will be padded with zeros and there will be a period of silence at the end of the song... the mathematical remainder, if you will. Each song will randomly have a different amount of gap at the end.
At some point, a meta tag option was introduced into the LAME MP3 encoder, so a compatible player could later know the exact song length, and not play the padded silence. This means that both the MP3 file and the player need to be gapless-ready, or it's not going to happen.
So, to say any one player can definitively play MP3s gaplessly is not valid, since it also depends on how any particular MP3 was encoded. Also, some MP3s will luckily have such a small amount of padding, you might think that the player is somehow gapless, but won't be with most other songs.
Hi, this reply might not be useful, but its just my opinion.
I'd prefer my music playback to have that momentary pause to catch a breather between different songs. And I think majority agrees with me.
Thus, since apps are built for the majority of users, this explains the lack of gapless music playback apps.
Yikes. Much of this discussion has been terribly misinformed. People have commented on what things work and what do not, but no one seems to have understood that there are too many intersecting issues to make a broad statement about particular players being gapless.
Here's the real deal: MP3s were never designed for gapless playback. This is because an MP3 file's length must always be a multiple of a certain fixed chunk of time. If the song's length isn't miraculously some multiple of that time, the file will be padded with zeros and there will be a period of silence at the end of the song... the mathematical remainder, if you will. Each song will randomly have a different amount of gap at the end.
At some point, a meta tag option was introduced into the LAME MP3 encoder, so a compatible player could later know the exact song length, and not play the padded silence. This means that both the MP3 file and the player need to be gapless-ready, or it's not going to happen.
So, to say any one player can definitively play MP3s gaplessly is not valid, since it also depends on how any particular MP3 was encoded. Also, some MP3s will luckily have such a small amount of padding, you might think that the player is somehow gapless, but won't be with most other songs.
I really don't know the technical details of gapless but my understanding is the player reads ahead and strips out the the padded zeros. I listen to a lot of live music, Furthur & The Grateful Dead. When playing on the iPhone the there never seemed to be a gap. Whether is is really gapless or not, I don't know. Now on Android, I got really good result with PowerAmp.I am probably one of those misimformed. Frankly, I don't care as long as I don't hear a gap in my live music.
I have recently had this problem (mainly listening to a ton of Pink Floyd stuff), and I found that JukeFox works great. It requires a little bit of configuration on your part. But it works!
Hi all,
Google Play Music running on Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean) or higher is ok and includes gapless playback.
hope this helps
Noemi
i usually listen to live albums and my iphone 4 does it best compared to my other phone lenovo vibe x2. i've tried using google music and the gaps are still very noticeable. a live album should not have any gaps, they go from one song to the nextiphone can do this no problem at all. It's OK, by 2015 Android will have caught up....Just wait 5 years it'll all be fine in the end ;-)