• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

George Zimmerman threatens his wife and her father

In the situation taht occurred, neither Zimmerman nor hte kid were innocent. Did the kid deserve to be shot? Probably *not* at all, but I highly doubt either of them were innocent and that both contributed to the situation. I really can't see defending either person in this situation.
 
I wasn't so much defending Zimmy as I was calling BS on baseless, false, judgementalisms being made.

If you are going to harangue someone or something at least do it with FACTS and not uninformed, ignorant, emotions.

This forum has always seemed to be the sty of the Libs here, I shouldn't be so surprised. Arguing emotionally versus Factually has Always been their forte. :rolleyes:


Bruce in Ocala, Fl
 
OcalaFlGuy said:
I wasn't so much defending Zimmy as I was calling BS on baseless, false, judgementalisms being made.

If you are going to harangue someone or something at least do it with FACTS and not uninformed, ignorant, emotions.

This forum has always seemed to be the sty of the Libs here, I shouldn't be so surprised. Arguing emotionally versus Factually has Always been their forte. :rolleyes:


Bruce in Ocala, Fl
Click to expand...

Not sure if this was in reference to me. I know you weren't necessarily defending Zimmerman or the kid. I was merely stating my opinion, which I've based on an analysis of the facts. I don't tend to argue emotionally. Both of them contributed to a bad situation, this is beyond argument and into stated fact. Regardless of whether or not the shooting was justified (court says it was and that Zimmerman is not guilty), both of them contributed to the situation.
 
saptech said:
Here we go again. Good thing FL gave him the right to carry a gun and use at his discretion!

Zimmerman charged with aggravated assault
Click to expand...
The original topic is about an incident with is wife & father-in-law.
I started this thread again with the above link. No one said anything about the killing GZ did until OcalaFlGuy posted.
the FACTS of the case are that Zimmy legally defended his own life that night in a life threatening situation.
Click to expand...
I'm assuming "that night in a life threatening situation" you are referring to the shooting incident. We was giving you facts that GZ had issues with the law before, during & after "that night in a life threatening situation".

But it seems everybody but you know all the facts. Ok, you win!
 
saptech said:
The original topic is about an incident with is wife & father-in-law. I started this thread again with the above link. No one said anything about the killing GZ did until OcalaFlGuy posted.
Click to expand...


Exactly what part of, "Here we go again", did You not understand when You typed it Yourself?


saptech said:
I'm assuming "that night in a life threatening situation" you are referring to the shooting incident. We was giving you facts that GZ had issues with the law before, during & after "that night in a life threatening situation".

But it seems everybody but you know all the facts. Ok, you win!
Click to expand...

Referencing your last sentence, well, since I can at least write a post that is intelligible and comprehendable, yes, I guess I Do win. :rolleyes:

Bruce in Ocala, Fl
 
dibblebill said:
Not sure if this was in reference to me. I know you weren't necessarily defending Zimmerman or the kid. I was merely stating my opinion, which I've based on an analysis of the facts. I don't tend to argue emotionally. Both of them contributed to a bad situation, this is beyond argument and into stated fact. Regardless of whether or not the shooting was justified (court says it was and that Zimmerman is not guilty), both of them contributed to the situation.
Click to expand...


Really only my first sentence was pertaining to your post. We're cool.


Bruce in Ocala, Fl
 
So I guess you are trying to tell me that in the past almost two weeks, the Only cognitive intelligent contribution to this discussion you can come up with is to go back and try and make what you yourself originally typed make some kind of sense?

Yeah.

Whatever. :rolleyes:

Bruce in Ocala, Fl
 
and of course shes now recanting her statements...... citing police intimidation and misrepresentation as the reason she made false statements

and yet again all those condemning a completely innocent man need to eat a little crow

this poor guy has only made 1 mistake...... being born in a society that doesnt believe in a persons rights
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom