Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is there an option to shoot RAW in Google Camera?
Restoring apps has been part of Android since version 4.0. restoring game saves is still a problem. Apple has been able to do both data and apps for ages.
That says nothing about whether or not they make this option available in their camera app, cause I don't expect Samsung to update older devices and make it available. They rarely do that with updates.Missed this earlier, but I was just rereading the feature list from Android.com:
A range of new professional photography features for Android Lollipop that let you:
Capture full resolution frames around 30 fps
Support raw formats like YUV and Bayer RAW
Control capture settings for the sensor, lens, and flash per individual frame
Capture metadata like noise models and optical information.
Restoring apps has been part of Android since version 4.0. restoring game saves is still a problem. Apple has been able to do both data and apps for ages.
You do understand that both apple and Google are going to material Design in both of their OS platforms right? it's sleeker and simple.I like a lot of things. but what Google is doing to Android is to me 'dumbing down'. it is looking more and more like iOS 7 which killed any interest I had in Apple. 5.0 is also entirely dependent on Google which has led to bad experiences across the board. i'm not a fan of the 'cloud' nor Google apps which is why I use a skinned Android ala Samsung or LG. but interest in Windows is getting better for me, so I keep an Android phone merely for compatibility with my Smartwatch. Windows Phone doesn't support *any* watches including Pebble.
I can't take the OS seriously with such dumb names and catering to a dumb iSheep market apparently. Key Lime Pie will remain far more professional than 'KitKat' and 'lollipop' is just stupid. I never liked Kit Kat anyway due to the whole horse meat scandal. I hated having any of my devices feeling like a buy-in to Nestle.
Still I don't like having to play very long games from the very beginning just because I either wipe or buy a new device. Too much grinding on many games that took a year to complete. Apple icloud has always saved game data. Not sure what point there is in Google Play Games if cloud saves aren't being done.
I can't take the OS seriously with such dumb names and catering to a dumb iSheep market apparently
Key Lime Pie will remain far more professional than 'KitKat'
I never liked Kit Kat anyway due to the whole horse meat scandal.
This^^^ haha. Issues much bro?i was speaking of Nestle in re: the horse meat scandal. hence my disdain at the name KitKat being part of a Google/Nestle partnership. being an animal lover myself, it felt as if i was buying into a company i want nothing to do with.
As for UI design, yea, the flat simple crap is really getting on my nerves. here we were with actual futuristic UIs, far from the flat 2-D monochromatic look of the MS-DOS Shell and System 6 from the first Mac, and now look! we're going BACK to the 1980s! worse yet, it's not bad enough OSs are doing it, now websites are doing it. what makes me cringe now is that i am fearful that flat design won't die off like it did in the mid-1990s. i fear it will be around and in worse and worse incarnations into the future, and unless i want to hold onto a very ancient tech product, there's no recourse from it. it's inevitable. i'm sure it won't be long before we start seeing low resolution screens because flat design doesn't need uber-high resolutions.
When i hear a name like 'lollipop' (which will no doubt be advertised or listed as the OS version in stores) i think of something a little 3 year old girl sucks on. is this the marketing that Google is going for? selling UI and an OS that is supposed to be for little kids? it sounds a bit childish.
I know they've always used dessert names for Android but up until now they have used very adult sounding titles. Eclair, Donut, etc. not candies often seen in the hands of kindergartners. so pardon my disdain at being a part of it. as i said i'm looking for alternatives if this is the direction that Google is taking Android.
Seeing the whole flat design/Material Design/whatever they call it now UI design does come off looking a bit like the old PC Games i played as a child myself. or at least the early attempts at GUIs back before computers could handle fancy 3-D graphics. now it appears we're going backwards and using dated looking UIs that either look like a 1970s brochure for Pan-American Airlines, or come off as cartoony as a PC Game from The Learning Company. i got out of those colorful, whimsical UIs when i stopped playing Super Solvers' Midnight Rescue. Where's the futuristic UIs i see in science fiction?
This^^^ haha. Issues much bro?
That says nothing about whether or not they make this option available in their camera app, cause I don't expect Samsung to update older devices and make it available. They rarely do that with updates.
i was speaking of Nestle in re: the horse meat scandal. hence my disdain at the name KitKat being part of a Google/Nestle partnership. being an animal lover myself, it felt as if i was buying into a company i want nothing to do with.
As for UI design, yea, the flat simple crap is really getting on my nerves. here we were with actual futuristic UIs, far from the flat 2-D monochromatic look of the MS-DOS Shell and System 6 from the first Mac, and now look! we're going BACK to the 1980s! worse yet, it's not bad enough OSs are doing it, now websites are doing it. what makes me cringe now is that i am fearful that flat design won't die off like it did in the mid-1990s. i fear it will be around and in worse and worse incarnations into the future, and unless i want to hold onto a very ancient tech product, there's no recourse from it. it's inevitable. i'm sure it won't be long before we start seeing low resolution screens because flat design doesn't need uber-high resolutions.
When i hear a name like 'lollipop' (which will no doubt be advertised or listed as the OS version in stores) i think of something a little 3 year old girl sucks on. is this the marketing that Google is going for? selling UI and an OS that is supposed to be for little kids? it sounds a bit childish.
I know they've always used dessert names for Android but up until now they have used very adult sounding titles. Eclair, Donut, etc. not candies often seen in the hands of kindergartners. so pardon my disdain at being a part of it. as i said i'm looking for alternatives if this is the direction that Google is taking Android.
Seeing the whole flat design/Material Design/whatever they call it now UI design does come off looking a bit like the old PC Games i played as a child myself. or at least the early attempts at GUIs back before computers could handle fancy 3-D graphics. now it appears we're going backwards and using dated looking UIs that either look like a 1970s brochure for Pan-American Airlines, or come off as cartoony as a PC Game from The Learning Company. i got out of those colorful, whimsical UIs when i stopped playing Super Solvers' Midnight Rescue. Where's the futuristic UIs i see in science fiction?
Where's the futuristic UIs i see in science fiction?
Apparently shooting raw is a core feature of Lollipop 5.0, and if Samsung do update their devices to Lollipop, then they should have it.