rootabaga
Android Expert
I think I would have been livid if this happened on a flight on which I was a passenger.
In fact, I think an "in-air ejection app" would be useful at times such as this.
Full article: United Jet Diverted as Fliers Fight Over Knee Defender Device - NBC News
Now, what I really don't understand is that two people were ejected from the flight (not in-air, once they diverted, ha ha). It's not clear from the article, but it's possible it may have been the person using the prohibited device as well as the person who couldn't recline because of the prohibited device. If that's the case, it's grossly unfair. Of course, it could also be the user's traveling companion, in which case that's fair.
That said, if you try to use a prohibited device like this and you are ignorant and rude enough to press the issue to the point it causes a flight diversion, you should 1) be required to reimburse the airline for the additional fuel and landing fee, 2) be required to compensate each fare-paying passenger the equivalent of US$100 and 3) be banned from all commercial flights for a period of one year (starting immediately, which means you have to find alternative means of transportation home).
Oh, and also be horse-whipped in a public square.

In fact, I think an "in-air ejection app" would be useful at times such as this.

The fight started on a United Airlines flight because one passenger was using the Knee Defender, a $21.95 gadget that attaches to a passenger's tray table and prevents the person in front of them from reclining. United Airlines said it prohibits use of the device, like all major U.S. airlines.
Full article: United Jet Diverted as Fliers Fight Over Knee Defender Device - NBC News
Now, what I really don't understand is that two people were ejected from the flight (not in-air, once they diverted, ha ha). It's not clear from the article, but it's possible it may have been the person using the prohibited device as well as the person who couldn't recline because of the prohibited device. If that's the case, it's grossly unfair. Of course, it could also be the user's traveling companion, in which case that's fair.
That said, if you try to use a prohibited device like this and you are ignorant and rude enough to press the issue to the point it causes a flight diversion, you should 1) be required to reimburse the airline for the additional fuel and landing fee, 2) be required to compensate each fare-paying passenger the equivalent of US$100 and 3) be banned from all commercial flights for a period of one year (starting immediately, which means you have to find alternative means of transportation home).
Oh, and also be horse-whipped in a public square.





