huskerkate
Android Enthusiast
Please don't tell me you all haven't Hitchhiker's. Are you all that young, or do you need your geek merit badges taken away?
actually, i'm too old. it came out 2 years after i finished law school...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please don't tell me you all haven't Hitchhiker's. Are you all that young, or do you need your geek merit badges taken away?
actually, i'm too old. it came out 2 years after i finished law school...

i do civil defense work (defending people who've been sued)...Please don't tell me you all haven't Hitchhiker's. Are you all that young, or do you need your geek merit badges taken away?
nah, i'm not smart enuf for that.i do civil defense work (defending people who've been sued)...

Ah, interesting. I work for the other side! We're adversaries! (But I do criminal.)![]()

that explains a lot... LOL![]()
Millinium just posted this link in the Nexus thread - looks nice!! and, i note that it was reported to be clocked at 1.5 ghz. to me, that signals an OMAP 4460, cuz i don't think the 4430 could get up to 1.5, even if "turbo charged" (or am i wrong in that)...??
But it really needs HD screen to be contender for Prime, Vigor, Optimus LTE.
i'm not buying anything until they both are out, and i can hold them side by side (like Mags said). for me, it might come down to the bootloader, and whether the RAZR is unlockable. i really don't want a Blurred up phone for 2 years. but, i would definitely take another OG Nexus-type device. at the same time, it would be awful difficult to pass up an open, dev'r friendly Nexus device with those specs. right now, i'm just very confused and undecided. i'm hoping that the revelations/releases in the next couple of weeks help make my decision easier...
this is as best as we can tell:
OMAP 4460
1800 mAh batt
1.2 ghz dual core (maybe 1.5)
1 gb RAM
8 mp camera
qHD Super AMOLED Advanced screen (something new - not much known about it)
4.3" screen
LTE
127 grams and 1/4" thick
kevlar back
diamond cut spun chrome
Docs from a Verizon focus group [unconfirmed] - Android Forums
Exclusive: Motorola Spyder (Droid RAZR for Verizon?) features industry-first qHD Super AMOLED display, LTE, dual-core processor | This is my next...
Additional Leaked Shots Of The DROID RAZR and XOOM2 Emerge - Droid Life: A Droid Community Blog
I don't see anyone saying OMAP 4460 but it's possible.
Honestly can you believe it has 1/4"=6.35mm thickness? I don't see how that's possible with 1800mAh battery and LTE radio.

you annoy me the most on these boards. You mouth off like an idiot on numerous posts, yet you know nothing other than recycling the stuff everyone else says.I don't see anyone saying OMAP 4460 but it's possible.
Honestly can you believe it has 1/4"=6.35mm thickness? I don't see how that's possible with 1800mAh battery and LTE radio.
you annoy me the most on these boards. You mouth off like an idiot on numerous posts, yet you know nothing other than recycling the stuff everyone else says.
Not everyone on these boards are as limited in what they know as you are. I've seen this device first hand (well, much more than that). Believe it, chump.
Since when raising valid concerns, question on unconfirmed spec, feature is considered annoying? So we are here to just praise the unreleased phone and believe whatever rumored spec, feature floating around?Like this. I mean, if this kind of theoretical thing was done by the manufacturer, could you then call the bootloader "unlockable"?While it is theoretically possible to release a signed mbmloader that then performs no further signature checks up the boot chain than the mbm.bin, allowing for custom kernels and ROMs ala the OG droid
There are many reasons that the bootloaders are not unlocked.Ok, Husker...that's really helpful.
I *think* I start to understand what the problem is, and that it is chip related. My question would be, is it possible that the chip might come with two versions of an encrypted mbm file? One for OEM updates and one that could be released to developers for use in their ROMs?
Like this. I mean, if this kind of theoretical thing was done by the manufacturer, could you then call the bootloader "unlockable"?
Everything you said here is really obvious. The carriers/makers and most users are either happy or oblivious with locked bootloaders. However there is vocal community of android users and enthusiasts who do care very much. This community is the source of some real ingenuity and innovation (re: cyanogen being hired by Samsung). This community is part of what makes Android "open". If a manufacturer wants to continue to ignore and stir up bad blood with that community, then so be it. As for me, though, if I wanted a walled garden I would get an iPhone.There are many reasons that the bootloaders are not unlocked.
1) Because of what you can do w/ the device (things that won't make a carrier / mfg happy)
2) Because you can really mess up your device (are you going to admit you screwed it up when you call to say your phone broke?)
3) Because of technical difficulties
4) Because most people really don't even care about an unlocked bootloader, so it doesn't really drive a business need. (for everybody that asks for an unlocked bootloader, how many do you think really couldn't care less. It's simply not worth the hassle for most. Same goes for root).
Believe it or not, most people just want their phone to work and don't spend their spare time on forums talking about specs and bootloaders and such. Until that changes, devices will tend to appeal to the masses (Apple has shown this is a very effective strategy).
There are many reasons that the bootloaders are not unlocked.
1) Because of what you can do w/ the device (things that won't make a carrier / mfg happy)
2) Because you can really mess up your device (are you going to admit you screwed it up when you call to say your phone broke?)
3) Because of technical difficulties
4) Because most people really don't even care about an unlocked bootloader, so it doesn't really drive a business need. (for everybody that asks for an unlocked bootloader, how many do you think really couldn't care less. It's simply not worth the hassle for most. Same goes for root).
Believe it or not, most people just want their phone to work and don't spend their spare time on forums talking about specs and bootloaders and such. Until that changes, devices will tend to appeal to the masses (Apple has shown this is a very effective strategy).
Who knows what final decisions are made at the very end. You never know. We could get surprised.i do understand these issues, and i agree that most people wouldn't know an unlocked BL from a hole in the ground, so they could care less. so, if they could care less, my thought would be to have an unlocked BL - the masses won't know the difference, and the small percentage of enthusiasts would also be satisfied. everybody wins.
i would kinda disagree with you on the "screwing up your device" concern. i've been around the forums for quite a while, and i can think of only 1 instance, out of thousands and thousands, where someone truly bricked their device. so, the vast majority of people don't care about rooting their phones, and only an infinitesimal percentage of people who root actually damage their devices. to me, that says that OEM's could leave the BL unlocked, still appeal to the masses, and satisfy the enthusiasts.
but, again, i do understand the argument you make. and, that is why i was kind of hoping/positing the idea of an "unlockable" BL, so that people could root and rom if they want, but there would be a clear way for OEM's and carriers to know that they voided their warranty. but, what i'm hearing from other sources (and maybe you can confirm) is that OMAP chips would not allow for unlocking after-the-fact??
Who knows what final decisions are made at the very end. You never know. We could get surprised.
