Root Just flashed to OMJ 2.2

[italianwjt]

WHU WHUUUUUT!! Ridiculously fast and smooth. Noticible difference right from the start. Just needed to share my excitement.

 

[uminchu]

Quadrant score and/or screen shot possible?, Btw, which OMJ?

 

[mitchellvii]

There is a rule in this forum that you aren't allowed to brag about your rom without pictures to prove it .

Which kernel are you running? Benchmarks?

 

[mitchellvii]

Ok, I'll bite for kicks. I am assuming this is a sense-based rom? I'll load it up real quick and run some benchies for comparison and post pics.

If it can beat this (cm6 nightly running on Snap 7.1), I'll be impressed:

 

[Hazy]

Ok, I'll bite for kicks. I am assuming this is a sense-based rom? I'll load it up real quick and run some benchies for comparison and post pics.

If it can beat this (cm6 nightly running on Snap 7.1), I'll be impressed:

I dont think any sense based ROM can beat CM6-snap.... specially snap 7.1 and the partition system (let's call it that lol)
I was able to squeeze 1950 from snap 8.2, and only 1600 from sense-based ROMs and i tried multiple king and netarchy kernels

 

[mitchellvii]

I know Snap 7.1 uses a "trick" to make their Quad scores higher, but that trick also makes the phone faster so it's all good

Just ran quad on this rom the guy is recommending - 1440 - I'll pass.

 

[Hazy]

I know Snap 7.1 uses a "trick" to make their Quad scores higher, but that trick also makes the phone faster so it's all good

Just ran quad on this rom the guy is recommending - 1440 - I'll pass.

well it speeds up read/write times with a specific partition, so it should lead to real-life performance improvements...
yeah if quadrants are not better than 1600 i pass too

 

[italianwjt]

Sorry for the delay, i havent been on this site in awhile. I'm using 3.26.651.6 omj evo2.2 froyo v3.1 / kernel 2.6.32.15 king HAVS OcUv eric@Ubuntu #6. Mine is nowhere near that lol, but its noticeable from what i had before so im still happy. Any recommendations?