PrinceCorwin
Android Expert
When I read the thread directing me how to install the various ROMs for the spectrum, I keep seeing a direction to verify the md5sum. How do I do that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

verifying the md5sum is overrated and though it has a reason behind doing so it's not really that important because I've been doing things on computers for years that say to verify the md5sum and I only did it like 2 times back years and years ago when I didn't know much and thought it was required. Honestly it's not that important because 99.999 percent of the time the md5sum will be fine.
I guess it's just the laziness in me but I honestly can't be bothered to ever check a stupid md5sum, and I can attest to the fact that it's never been an issue for me. So do as me and say away with checking the md5sum and just assume it's good to go, because most of the time it is![]()
I think I'll go with this advice, since I have absolutely no idea what Neph is talking about. His knowledge is over my head.

Point well taken though, my advice may not have been the best but my advice wasn't meant to help him with a problem so much as it was to let him know that md5sum verification isn't a life and death thing and actually can be ignored. I'm living proof that this is the case being that I haven't done a md5sum verification in ten years, and have never once suffered any bad consequences from not doing so. Sure I've had a few files that were currupted over the years, but a redownload fixed it. Perhaps I could have saved 5 minutes here and there over the years but I would have wasted 50 hours checking md5sum every time I download something.

the years and years ago was not just 2 but actually more like ten. You guys are just super geeks that like your t's crossed and i's dottedPoint well taken though, my advice may not have been the best but my advice wasn't meant to help him with a problem so much as it was to let him know that md5sum verification isn't a life and death thing and actually can be ignored. I'm living proof that this is the case being that I haven't done a md5sum verification in ten years, and have never once suffered any bad consequences from not doing so. Sure I've had a few files that were currupted over the years, but a redownload fixed it. Perhaps I could have saved 5 minutes here and there over the years but I would have wasted 50 hours checking md5sum every time I download something.
PS. I rarely use backups either
PPS: I've not bricked my phone once in the year I've had it =]

come again??? you've not permantly bricked you phone you mean??? I seem to recall quite a few occasions of a soft brick.![]()
To interject, MD5 when I started using Linux was for integrity checking to make sure someone didn't unpack a file and insert some malicious code and repackage it and then distribute it, so MD5 is for security checking, I suppose it works for corruption in any form too.
I am with IMUcarmen, use to do MD5 years ago (13 or so) saw it was a waste most of the time, it is all about trust I suppose, do you trust where you download from and who you download from.
Linux/K3B has a built in MD5 checksum generator checker, makes it handy.
True. Hence why download providers picked it up as a integrity checker.Malicious code injection and other forms of security breaches are just intentional forms of corruption.
To interject, MD5 when I started using Linux was for integrity checking to make sure someone didn't unpack a file and insert some malicious code and repackage it and then distribute it, so MD5 is for security checking, I suppose it works for corruption in any form too.
I am with IMUcarmen, use to do MD5 years ago (13 or so) saw it was a waste most of the time, it is all about trust I suppose, do you trust where you download from and who you download from.
Linux/K3B has a built in MD5 checksum generator checker, makes it handy.

To me when something is broken to the point it is useless then it is just that. My$.02MD5 was broken for that sort of use in 1996.
For checking rom downloads, it's perfectly fine.
And to say it's about crypto use and just trusting the download source simply means that you trust things in the entire data path.
I started using checksums in the early 80s to verify satellite data transfers and have yet to be convinced that it's a bad idea to verify file transfers.![]()
![]()

Back in dial up days sure 100% believe that you should check files, data integrity from servers has gotten much better as download speeds have increased.


you recall wrongly. unless you remember something I don't, because I don't recall any soft bricks. I've had issues with things like that time twrp was killing me and every rom I installed using it ran really buggy, but I never had a bootloop or soft brick, I just had a buggy rom each time.
